Proposal: Free agency edition Trade Rumours/Proposals [MOD - Stay on Topic] 5

[Senovision]

I think they will make a trade for sure if this losing skid continues.
What kind of trade is anyone's guess.

 

[Mosby]

Cole Beaudoin and something else in place of Iginla?

 

[Micklebot]

I think they will make a trade for sure if this losing skid continues.

The question to me is why are we struggling,

Sanderson is a big part, from being our clear best Dman last year, to the worst +/- on the team this year, with 1 ES pt all year
Pinto is a big part of it, from close to a 60 pts pace last year, to a 22 pt pace this year.
Ullmark has been a big part, expected to be a top 10 goalie for us, has been an trainwreck.

I don't think we can solve any of that by making a trade. That doesn't mean we shouldn't make trades, just that a trade should not be aimed at solving the short term, rather it should have a longer term outlook.

 

[Big Muddy]

I think they will make a trade for sure if this losing skid continues.
What kind of trade is anyone's guess.

I’d have to wonder about that given that Staois seems to be methodical & patient (perhaps). He doesn’t seem prone to knee-jerk reactions imo.

 

[Blotto71]

The question to me is why are we struggling,

Sanderson is a big part, from being our clear best Dman last year, to the worst +/- on the team this year, with 1 ES pt all year
Pinto is a big part of it, from close to a 60 pts pace last year, to a 22 pt pace this year.
Ullmark has been a big part, expected to be a top 10 goalie for us, has been an trainwreck.

I don't think we can solve any of that by making a trade. That doesn't mean we shouldn't make trades, just that a trade should not be aimed at solving the short term, rather it should have a longer term outlook.

Too many passengers. Lack of ownership, urgency, accountability on the part of many players.

And maybe Justin Peter's isn't the best in class goalie coach we all thought he was.

 

[frightenedinmatenum2]

Great constructive feedback. Have to think Iginla being the first draft in franchise history is off the table.
Not sure which top prospect/young player i would offer for 3 years of Tkachuk. Crouse admittedly a lot lower value than i gave him in my proposal.

More realistic to try and aquire Pinto.

I don't think acquiring Pinto is realistic. I don't see why the Sens trade him.

 

[Heldig]

I don't think acquiring Pinto is realistic. I don't see why the Sens trade him.

OK, his name was listed as one of the guys that could be moved. UHC really needs a C. Norris is too big a risk injury wise for that contract. Stutzle is untouchable so that left Pinto as a possible target / shake up.

 

[Micklebot]

Too many passengers. Lack of ownership, urgency, accountability on the part of many players.

And maybe Justin Peter's isn't the best in class goalie coach we all thought he was.

I don't know whether Justin Peters is a good goalie coach or not or who "we all thought he was", but I am pretty damn sure he isn't the reason for Ullmark's struggles.

For most of the season, on D, the issue has been the top pair. I think Sanderson is playing hurt, it's the most likely explanation for the rapid fall off in his game.

Up front, I think the trio of Pinto Greig and Giroux have been the most disappointing, I give Perron a pass for now given the context. Giroux is getting old so I understand that, I don't think Pinto or Greig lacking onsetship for their play though, I'm pretty sure they know they need to be better.

 

[Boud]

OK, his name was listed as one of the guys that could be moved. UHC really needs a C. Norris is too big a risk injury wise for that contract. Stutzle is untouchable so that left Pinto as a possible target / shake up.

You are contradicting yourself in the same sentence.

Norris is a huge risk injury wise … so let’s trade another center. So we are then left with thin center depth and one of them is always injured.

It’s the opposite… we need to keep Pinto because if/when Norris gets injured at least he can step in and play top 6. His name was listed because there was a contract negotiation that apparently wasn’t going well. Now he’s under contract he’s not going anywhere.

Pinto moving is extremely unlikely.

If you want to shake things up he’s not the guy you move.

 

[Heldig]

You are contradicting yourself in the same sentence.

Norris is a huge risk injury wise … so let’s trade another center. So we are then left with thin center depth and one of them is always injured.

It’s the opposite… we need to keep Pinto because if/when Norris gets injured at least he can step in and play top 6. His name was listed because there was a contract negotiation that apparently wasn’t going well. Now he’s under contract he’s not going anywhere.

Pinto moving is extremely unlikely.

If you want to shake things up he’s not the guy you move.

No contradiction. I am talking as a fan of the team trading for someone from Ottawa.

I would not want my team to trade for Norris. Contract is too big for too long given his production and injury history. So a possible target, as it has been discussed the Sens need to shake up their core, is to try and acquire Pinto.

If he is not available, that is understandable.