Habs
Jake Evans will steal your wife
- Feb 28, 2002
- 23,232
- 18,340
I am done for a while, this is simply no longer enjoyable
Sound like my wife after I lay the pipe and ask her how it was.
I am done for a while, this is simply no longer enjoyable
NHL coaches are mostly useless. I’ve said this for years. Firing msl will make no difference. It’s just lack of talent on the team. Ridiculous thread here saying serious coaching problem. lol. I refuse to read it.One caller sounded very distraught and said why aren't there fingers pointing at Hughes and Gorton at this point. MSL is what it is. He isn't going to change so it's up to management to make moved - e.g. make coaching change. Bring experience behind the bench... coaching experience.
I completely utterly disagree with you on this.I think I said it enough... a new coach - that's my solution. If according to you no coach would make a difference with this team then why have one? Why some teams start playing better and some worse when coaches change? with the same players.
OR how about we try and actually draft some quality players and then actually develop them properly. I see other teams do it all the time. It's incredible watching good teams...draft mid to late first round and second round and somehow they just "get lucky" I guess with players hitting. Weird how that works.
I asked this question a while back but when was the last time we developed a player properly...someone answered Pacioretty and they weren't wrong...says a lot. Now of course people will say CC bit he developed in the US college program so..
You bring several good points that replacing MSL is probably not the solution but I say that he should never have been hired in the 1st place.NHL coaches are mostly useless. I’ve said this for years. Firing msl will make no difference. It’s just lack of talent on the team. Ridiculous thread here saying serious coaching problem. lol. I refuse to read it.
I completely utterly disagree with you on this.
With pivots like that you should think of following basketball instead of hockey.Accountability and standards are something even “rebuilding teams” have to have. Giving the team a signal that there are minimum performance expectations is a good thing and will help with their professional development.
Primeau is an example of a “low hanging fruit”, something that would not be difficult to change.
I hope my perspective is clear enough for your understanding now — you can disagree but don’t call it a whine, because it ain’t.
The season shouldn’t be lost, but it is. Hughes sat on his hands while his coach did nothing and the results and performances and effort levels (predictably) didn’t change.
Now we have a team that will happily lose and collect their paycheque for the better part of a professional season. It’s literally a Losing Culture. They come to work knowing they will lose and no matter their effort, they will be paid and cozy and not even demoted or scratched. There are zero downsides to bad efforts = bad efforts are reinforced as part of the daily routine. Losing culture.
It’s funny you think a GM has to wait until the summer to make a minor roster move. You must’ve been Bergevin’s bravest soldier — moves are hard! Wait and be patient! We mustn’t mortgage the future!
I see you've downgraded the biggest reason to a huge reason. Wait, that must be my reading comprehension.I guess reading comprehension isn’t your forte.
I said Dach is a huge reason why we’re where we are, not the only reason. Our D is a completely different issue and we were well aware of it coming into this season. It was the main reason I said we wouldn’t make the playoffs going into this year.
Dach’s poor performance on the other hand was not expected. That’s thrown us for a loop and it’s affected the forwards - especially guys like Newhook and Slaf - in a really bad way.
I never said it is the only way. I said it is low-hanging fruit.With pivots like that you should think of following basketball instead of hockey.
Apparently now you want to send a message to the team and the way to do that is by trading the backup goalie. Not only that you think this should have been done a long time ago in the season. What makes you think the players are going to give a shit about a guy getting traded who barely plays? Wanna trade Pezzetta while you're at it to "send a message"?
We've already moved past that, try and keep up. Yeah no shit it's easy to dump a poor performing backup, we could also fire the zamboni driver too. I get that you think moving the back up will just send massive shockwaves through the team but odds are the team will still have the massive problems that extend beyond the backup. Do you think Slaf is going to be like "oh shit new backup, better stop pretending I don't know how to play hockey!". Your solution will fix next to nothing and might cause problems.I never said it is the only way. I said it is low-hanging fruit.
Before we continue, please confirm you understand what is meant by the metaphor 'low-hanging fruit'. I'm not sure you get it.
One could argue acquiring Dach is now a setback. Don’t see anything to think he will be a 2c which now they have to go hunting for that all over again. And with his compete level he should not be in the top 6. I bet he is gone by the time his contract expires.You bring several good points that replacing MSL is probably not the solution but I say that he should never have been hired in the 1st place.
The team is arguably one of the least talented in the entire league and that's the biggest problem.
Chicago decided to rebuild and thought that trading a 21 year old 6'4 3rd overall pick was part of their rebuild should have been a red flag to every GM in the league regarding Kirby Dach.
Acquiring players like Newhook and Dach did not help this franchise in any way.
Biggest - huge... either way. I'm not downgrading anything.I see you've downgraded the biggest reason to a huge reason. Wait, that must be my reading comprehension.
Newhook's play improved over the past few weeks away from Dach. He wasn't rewarded for it but his play improved.Dach doesn't play on Newhook's line how is he affecting him?
He is the delta between expectations and performance. We weren't going to be great anyway... but we expected the team to improve. Dach and Hutson were the two biggest reasons why.Yes, Dach has been a disappointment but he is not the biggest or even a huge reason for the Habs' poor performance so far this season. Many other reasons are far more problematic than Dach's poor showing.
Seems like you understand what is meant by the phrase 'low-hanging fruit'.We've already moved past that, try and keep up. Yeah no shit it's easy to dump a poor performing backup, we could also fire the zamboni driver too. I get that you think moving the back up will just send massive shockwaves through the team but odds are the team will still have the massive problems that extend beyond the backup. Do you think Slaf is going to be like "oh shit new backup, better stop pretending I don't know how to play hockey!". Your solution will fix next to nothing and might cause problems.
Bottom six is below average and this summer should be completely overhauled.Biggest - huge... either way. I'm not downgrading anything.
But it's not the only reason. We weren't going to be a good team with or without him returning to form. Most of us expected around 85 points and that's WITH Dach playing well.
Newhook's play improved over the past few weeks. He wasn't rewarded for it but his play improved.
Let's see how he does with Dach going forward.
He is the delta between expectations and performance. We weren't going to be great anyway... but we expected the team to improve. Dach and Hutson were the two biggest reasons why.
85 points was achievable but only with Dach coming back. Him returning as he has means we won't even meet those modest expectations. He's obvioulsy not the only problem, but he's the biggest issue we had this year. First line looks good. Bottom six looks good. D is as advertised. The 2nd line is way below where we thought they'd be.
Once again you dance around everything, trying to be abstract instead of actually saying anything of worth. Your "warm hands" nonsense isn't as clever as you think it is, we get it.Seems like you understand what is meant by the phrase 'low-hanging fruit'.
So now do you understand I'm using the backup goalie as an example of why Kent Hughes is sitting on his hands? (Hence "warm hands". It is another turn of phrase with which you might not be familiar if you're not native English). If he's incapable or reluctant to even change the historically bad performing backup goalie, and he's not made any roster moves or staff moves or anything at all toward any other change, what else can we gather from this situation than the obvious: he has no solutions, so he's bunting it at base.
Time is an extremely valuable resource when taking entropy into account -- what we have in hand today can crumble and fall easier than it could be built upon. That is to say, we can lose what little we have more easily than we can build upon it. It's a physical law of nature. There are guardrails and safeguards in the NHL cartel to protect franchies from fitness tests but the fact remains what is commonly described as a losing culture *can be* more dangerous than anything else. Tottenham Hotspur, Seattle Mariners, Cleveland Browns, Detroit Lions, Buffalo Sabres, Toronto Maple Leafs, etc. It becomes a curse.
If our GM is not proactive enough to do even the smallest roster move (they haven't even once scratched one of the bum players whose bummy play is like a bum contagion stinkin' up the ice every night) I think that portends bad things.
Do you think the above is actually fine and another 50-odd games of this will not contribute to the losing culture and that the slightly higher draft pick at the end of it will make up for the fact Slaf, Dach, Newhook, Barron, Struble, Primeau, and even Guhle have seemingly not improved one bit?