daver
Registered User
- Apr 4, 2003
- 26,966
- 6,712
If drinking causes you to uncontrollably r*pe people, then they would pull it off the shelves. It doesn't hold up as an excuse whatsoever.
Who is saying it is an excuse?
If drinking causes you to uncontrollably r*pe people, then they would pull it off the shelves. It doesn't hold up as an excuse whatsoever.
This was his direct quote.He’s not wrong. It happens in every sport, every business, everyone who has power and everywhere in the world. Sad but true.
If drinking causes you to uncontrollably r*pe people, then they would pull it off the shelves. It doesn't hold up as an excuse whatsoever.
If the court finds one 'not guilty' and NHL does not allow them back then I hope they sue the league and anyone who treats them with prejudice.
Player 1 or not..if you aren't convicted you get to live 'normally'
Who said anything about becoming creeps and wierdos, turning into a different person, uncontrollable rape, or being an excuse?That really doesn't hold up. There's plenty of guys who have no trouble drinking without turning into creeps and weirdos. If you don't have self control as a person sober, you should probably not be drinking. It's not some strange elixir that magically turns you into a different person.
If drinking causes you to uncontrollably r*pe people, then they would pull it off the shelves. It doesn't hold up as an excuse whatsoever.
Obviously. If they were accepting a hypothetical deal though, you'd certainly think it would be something pretty minor with no possiblity of jail
If that's your line of thinking, their careers are already over then. Being acquitted of more serious charges in a trial won't do anything to move perception. Perhaps even the case being thrown out wouldn't either.
Other than a potential starting goalie, the guys we think being charged are all role players anyway. That goalie has been very up and down in his career, too.
In terms of getting another chance, the talent of the players matters, whether right or wrong.
Wow. Not sure how old you are, or how experienced you are in life. Regardless, you have one huge dose of reality coming your way. Sometimes life doesn't work the way you think it does. There's power and there's power. The the "1-5 boys" don't possess that kind of power. Not even close. If they were as talented as one or two of their Team Canada teammates??? Maaaaaaaaaaayyybe???? But sadly for them they are not. Just some frat bro types who, at best, got their dicks caught in the door hinge.If the court finds one 'not guilty' and NHL does not allow them back then I hope they sue the league and anyone who treats them with prejudice.
Player 1 or not..if you aren't convicted you get to live 'normally'
Who is saying it is an excuse?
Also, and more importantly- increased risk of committing non-violent sexual misconduct, on a spectrum from simple impairment of their emotional intelligence/ ability to accurately read and appropriately react to the behaviour of their sexual partner, all the way to impaired judgement/loosening of inhibition causing them to act in ways they wouldn't normally.
Doubly so for a bottom-6 talent who will be in his late 20s at the time and is about to spend at least a year away from competitive hockey (assuming player 1 isn't a goalie). The juice won't be anywhere close to worth the squeeze for the league, regardless of the outcome. Unless, as you say, one of these 5 can prove they weren't in the room or something.Is playing in the NHL "living normally"? The NHL has no obligation to let anyone play in its league, it is a business. Unless a scenario plays out where a player has concrete proof that they were somewhere else entirely, no team is going to want the PR headache of bringing in a player who was involved in this situation. A pro hockey contract isn't a human right, it's a rare privilege, and I don't see many scenarios where the benefits outweigh the costs for the league or any given team.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you haven't had your morning coffee and aren't fully processing.If you're the type of person worried about an increased risk of committing non-violent sexual misconduct when you drink, do everyone a favor and don't
Yeah I agree. When I said women have to be aware of putting themselves in bad situations, I meant in general, not for this specific incident. No reason if you’re the girl to think all of a sudden a bunch of guys are going to show up because the first player called them. That’s not normal behavior for the first player and can’t be accounted for.I don't think the onus is on women to be aware of bad situations. They're allowed to get drunk and should be able to do that without worrying that like half a dozen random guys show up doing whatever they want to them. Is that something guys have to worry about? If she left a bar inebriated with one person and sobered up to way more than she bargained for, the bad situation she found herself in was hanging around hockey players.
While no organization can realistically be expected to be a parent for these guys, I think it's important to remind them that hockey is a fringe sport. No one outside their bubble gives a f*ck about them and no one is coming to save them. Screwing up when you're a nobody doesn't even give the court of public opinion. It just makes women want to cover their drinks when hockey players are around.
Anything with a criminal record and they will have a hard time travelling back to the US
1) The average Joe might. An NHL player who has to travel there to work, would not.
2) Who said they'd be left with a criminal record? For first time offenders in non-violent crimes, Most often plea deals come with a discharge and no permanent public criminal record
Old enough to remember MacTavish taking a life while drunk but still managing a great career and is still employed by SN.Wow. Not sure how old you are, or how experienced you are in life. Regardless, you have one huge dose of reality coming your way. Sometimes life doesn't work the way you think it does. There's power and there's power. The the "1-5 boys" don't possess that kind of power. Not even close. If they were as talented as one or two of their Team Canada teammates??? Maaaaaaaaaaayyybe???? But sadly for them they are not. Just some frat bro types who, at best, got their dicks caught in the door hinge.
Errh, what possible infraction/plea are you referring to exactly?1) The average Joe might. An NHL player who has to travel there to work, would not.
2) Who said they'd be left with a criminal record? For first time offenders in non-violent crimes, Most often plea deals come with a discharge and no permanent public criminal record.
not all assaults are violent, you can poke someone and catch an assault chargeDo you know what the word "assault" means?
f*** me.....1) The average Joe might. An NHL player who has to travel there to work, would not.
2) Who said they'd be left with a criminal record? For first time offenders in non-violent crimes, Most often plea deals come with a discharge and no permanent public criminal record.
no all assaults are violent, you can poke someone and catch an assault charge
just for clarity rape isn't always violent, violent rapes will usually get an aggrivated sexual charge which is way more seriousf*** me.....
Again, for emphasis, f*** me..........
This place blows my mind sometimes.
I mean, the least "violent" count I could think of here would probably be, I dunno, Forcible Confinement?That's still a violent crime, it's just a very low degree of violence.
Anyway, any charge related to sexual assault would be considered a violent crime. You aren't plea-dealing your way to a clean record on a sexual assault charge.
oh 100% agree, only way I can see that is if the crown doesn't want to go to trial and offers a sweatheart deal to avoid trialThat's still a violent crime, it's just a very low degree of violence.
Anyway, any charge related to sexual assault would be considered a violent crime. You aren't plea-dealing your way to a clean record on a sexual assault charge.
Do you know what the word "assault" means?
I mean, WTF could they even offer? The only thing I could see (without being aware of the full record of course) that would possibly be acceptable for both the Prosecution and the Accused is Forcible confinement.oh 100% agree, only way I can see that is if the crown doesn't want to go to trial and offers a sweatheart deal to avoid trial
I’m not saying drunk driving is okay but there is a difference between that and rape. It’s not cool but plenty of people have got behind the wheel after drinking a few; they never think anything bad will happen. A rapist is going out of his way to rape. It’s the intent that matters and the maliciousness. One is a predator, the other made a big mistakeOld enough to remember MacTavish taking a life while drunk but still managing a great career and is still employed by SN.