Olli Juolevi - drafted #5 overall in 2016
Miro Heiskanen - projects as a mid first round pick in 2017
Vili Saarijarvi - 3rd round pick in 2015. A PPG defenseman in the OHL
Uhro Vaakanainen - projects as a mid-late first round pick in 2017
Juuso Valimaki - projects as a mid-late first round pick in 2017
Kasper Bjorkqvist - 2nd round pick in 2016
Henrik Borgstrom - 1st round pick in 2016
Janne Kuokkanen - 2nd round pick in 2016
Julius Nattinen - 2nd round pick in 2016
Eeli Tolvanen - projects as a top 10 pick in 2017
Kristian Vesalainen - projects as a mid 1st round pick in 2017
THIS!
With this kind of talent there is no way Finland should have lost to Denmark even though they are stronger than they have been in the past. And more importantly Finland’s game should not look so disjointed, passive, poor, etc.. That is 99% on the coach. Losing Pulju, Aho, Laine, Kapanen, Rantanen, etc is a reason why a gold was not expected by anyone and even a medal was an unrealistic expectation. But team with this kind of talent should not go to relegation round.
Let’s remember that last time Rautakorpi coached the Finnish U20 team the result was also relegation round. That is no coincidence. He is simply not suited to coach kids. In a short tournament the coach should bring right kind of spirit to the team, set up a system that brings out the strengths of the players and make right kind of line combinations and reactions in the game. Rautakorpi failed to do all of those things… again.
And there is a reason the players had a players only meeting before the game against the Sweden. Captain Juolevi said that the team’s message to the coaching staff was that they wanted more freedom and more active style to their game to be able to use their strengths. This is a polite way to say the same thing that the Swedish TV hockey commentator Jonas Andersson said in a more blunt way after the Sweden-Finland game. He said that Rautakorpi did absolutely poor job and his playbook was from the past century. I often don’t like if a coach is blamed for everything but in this case I have to agree that this is 99% on the coach.
And yes, firing the coach could be seen as a way to save face by the Finnish hockey federation, who are to blame by naming Rautakorpi in the first place… knowing his U20 history. But I think the bigger reason is that they realized that Rautakorpi has completely lost the locker room (if he ever had it) and they can’t afford the risk of Rautakorpi having the team to lose the relegation round as well.
This tournament can’t be saved anymore but the complete disaster can be avoided. And I’m very curious to see how different the team’s play will look like when Ahokas takes over even though he will have very little time to work with the team.