F Rutger McGroarty - University of Michigan, NCAA (2022, 14th, WPG; traded to PIT)

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,678
17,252
Bomoseen, Vermont
I think WPG fans can boo Rutger for it all they want, its annoying for them, but in a lot of the situations where this happens, its usually the teams fault. It was the Blackhawks fault that Kevin Hayes didn't sign. It was the Flyers fault that Gauthier didn't sign. Its likely going to be WPGs fault that Rutger gets traded. There are also situations that is obviously not the teams fault (Fox, Vesey, others)

NCAA guys have leverage.. so keep that in mind when dealing with them. They aren't just assets you can jerk around, they have a verifiable path to UFA and picking who they want.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,447
21,349
MN
Normally I'm all for workers choosing where they go BUT the NHL is not the standard workplace in any sense. What your mentioning would result in something very similar to european football. One or two teams win the league titles year in and year out and MAYBE other teams get one every 5 years or so. The draft is a good thing for the league.

I also want to point out that I have no issue with what Rutger is doing. This kind of thing doesn't happen enough that people should be getting so worked up about it.
In McGroarty's case, he would be asked to sign a two way contract, which would probably pay him 80-90K in the AHL. Sounds like a lot until you add up expenses that a world class athlete needs to incur, and you have to factor in that once they sign the contract their team has total control of where and when they can play. Teams can decide to trade him at any moment, necessitating that both he and his wife/gf/kids also move at the drop of the hat. Until he is a FA, he has no protection from that. I am all for players using whatever leverage they have to improve their working conditions.

I think WPG fans can boo Rutger for it all they want, its annoying for them, but in a lot of the situations where this happens, its usually the teams fault. It was the Blackhawks fault that Kevin Hayes didn't sign. It was the Flyers fault that Gauthier didn't sign. Its likely going to be WPGs fault that Rutger gets traded. There are also situations that is obviously not the teams fault (Fox, Vesey, others)

NCAA guys have leverage.. so keep that in mind when dealing with them. They aren't just assets you can jerk around, they have a verifiable path to UFA and picking who they want.
It's not really UFA, but i get your point.
 

FlyguyOX

Registered User
Jun 29, 2018
4,176
4,171
I think WPG fans can boo Rutger for it all they want, its annoying for them, but in a lot of the situations where this happens, its usually the teams fault. It was the Blackhawks fault that Kevin Hayes didn't sign. It was the Flyers fault that Gauthier didn't sign. Its likely going to be WPGs fault that Rutger gets traded. There are also situations that is obviously not the teams fault (Fox, Vesey, others)

NCAA guys have leverage.. so keep that in mind when dealing with them. They aren't just assets you can jerk around, they have a verifiable path to UFA and picking who they want.
"It's your fault you didn't force minutes to the 20yo who demanded it while you were in a stanley cup playoff run!"
 

TLEH

Pronounced T-Lay
Feb 28, 2015
20,678
17,252
Bomoseen, Vermont
Honest question, do you think the Jets should have put McGroarty in the lineup last year for the last 2 games (there weren't many left after his NCAA season finished), when the Jets were a 4th overall team that was still trying to win home ice advantage and had players with NHL experience in the press box?
Uh yeah lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: RogerRoger

vildurson

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
843
702
Honest question, do you think the Jets should have put McGroarty in the lineup last year for the last 2 games (there weren't many left after his NCAA season finished), when the Jets were a 4th overall team that was still trying to win home ice advantage and had players with NHL experience in the press box?
Home ice advantage does not matter that much anymore for playoffs. Would have been easy out for them from this situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: um and TLEH

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
10,951
30,540
1) Home ice isn't even that big of a deal.
2) Getting him in the organization is way more important
3) The experienced guys he would be replacing aren't the difference between winning or losing some regular season games
it's funny how tkachuk mid interview after winning the stanley cup pointed out how important/underrated home ice was...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

Marioesque

Registered User
Oct 7, 2021
2,569
3,136
1) Home ice isn't even that big of a deal.

When the difference between teams is thin, it can make the difference. The finals just proved it. Florida had more control of matchups and won by a hair.
 

gojetsgo

Registered User
Nov 1, 2015
10,951
30,540
hmmm who do we believe when talking about the home ice advantage, the guy who's been to b2b finals and just won the stanley cup or random hf posters...
 

CaptainUgly

Bronx Bombers
Apr 22, 2018
1,015
1,536
Why are we talking to Boston? They have nothing to offer. No picks, prospects, or NHL ready players they are willing to give up.
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,337
13,382
southern cal
Why are we talking to Boston? They have nothing to offer. No picks, prospects, or NHL ready players they are willing to give up.

Boston did acquire the #25th overall pick. That would be a better consolation than if McGroarty becomes a UFA and the Jets get a 2nd round pick. But who knows what else they can pry off of Boston?
 

JustYourRegularGuy

Registered User
Jun 27, 2024
14
13
Why are we talking to Boston? They have nothing to offer. No picks, prospects, or NHL ready players they are willing to give up.

What are you talking about? Boston has quite a few talented players/picks in the next few years to trade.

They could trade you guys Merkulov, Lysell, maybe even Poitras if the Bruins' front office think McGroarty think he'll be the better future piece.

Then you add-in guys like Mason Lohrei that could be had if Boston really wants your guy.

So yeah, Boston definitely has the pieces to acquire McGroarty if they deem him an important grab.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kalv

cneely

Registered User
Jan 6, 2005
10,195
1,279
What are you talking about? Boston has quite a few talented players/picks in the next few years to trade.

They could trade you guys Merkulov, Lysell, maybe even Poitras if the Bruins' front office think McGroarty think he'll be the better future piece.

Then you add-in guys like Mason Lohrei that could be had if Boston really wants your guy.

So yeah, Boston definitely has the pieces to acquire McGroarty if they deem him an important grab.
Zero chance they give up Lohrei. Poitras is a stretch. The other 2 could probably be had though.
 

um

Registered User
Sep 4, 2008
16,007
5,922
toronto
Just looked at the last regular season game, game log:

Kupari, Lambert, Niederreiter, Vilardi, Gustafsson, and Chibrikov all played under 15 minutes.

The other April games weren't loaded either.

Clearly there was no room for McGroaty on this stacked roster of superstars. And there was definitely nobody who could have used some rest before round 1.

Jets displayed a real lack of confidence in their roster finishing off the season strong. Playing McGroaty was going to make very little difference. It was a low risk high upside situation, and they fumbled it big time.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad