And that's the question. Is Iafallo just the best of what the Kings have had to throw out there, or is he a real 50 point guy? His best seasons have been on two terrible teams. Being that he'll be 28 next Dec, is he a 50 point player every year going forward? The Kings likely won't really be in the conversation for a couple more years, and that's assuming the building blocks work out. Iafallo will be 30 by then. Usually, when offering a decent contract to a UFA, what you really want are the first few years, but you end up having to pay for the last few. Unless the Kings are ready to start making a push next year, what are you buying if you give Iafallo a 50 point player contract? Are you getting a 50 point guy 3 years from now, or is he a 35 point guy? Is he attached to Kopitar? What if Kopitar is a 3rd line guy at that point?
I don’t understand your reasoning at all.
Iafallo is not the best the Kings had, he is the one that worked on Kopi’s LW.
There was a long list of sexier names that tried out in that spot and didn’t do so well. Heck, we had Clifford, King, and Lewis all playing LW1 at times, then a long list 30-goal scoring fails up there.
the kid has done nothing but deliver, 50% better on the score sheet, season after season, without cheating or sacrificing his 200 foot game.
So let’s say we sign him for $4-5M on a 3-year deal, and in a couple seasons him and Kopi end up on the third line ... what’s the downside?
Most of our blue-chip prospects are still on their ELCs, save for Vilardi, Brown and Carter are off the books, and if Kopi is on the 3rd line, we are celebrating two of Byfield, Vilardi, Turcotte rocking the top center spots.
In the meantime you get a reliable winger with a modern motor that works with our legendary center and keeps him young.
I seriously don’t see where that money would be better spent with less risk.