Micklebot
Moderator
- Apr 27, 2010
- 56,693
- 34,487
What’s the alternative to living and working through this virus like we are doing now?
@Sensmileletsgo I don't think there is a clean and easy one. It's certainly NOT re-opening high traffic areas like sit-down restaurants. I think this is as good as we're going to get, but it doesn't work nearly as effectively without public buy-in. As long as people make the conscious choice to be selfish and not care about the people around them, we'll be stuck in a holding pattern until a reliable vaccine hits the market. And even then, anti-vaxxers will slow the process.
I’m referring to the choice to walk around unmasked, to spread conspiracy theories like “The virus is lab-made” and the choice to downplay the severity of this virus when it’s killing people indiscriminately. These choices are all selfish and actively harm community efforts to prevent the spread.Conscious choice to be selfish?
What is it you are referring to here?
At least the next decade... the economy is shattered..
Social Services are going to get wrecked
People in poverty will have no help
Covid ended small business so big corporations like Walmart and Amazon control the entire market
I’m just happy I did not open by own restaurant like I had planned... would have wrecked me... Covid ended the entire thing I’ve been working towards the last decade.
I’m referring to the choice to walk around unmasked, to spread conspiracy theories like “The virus is lab-made” and the choice to downplay the severity of this virus when it’s killing people indiscriminately. These choices are all selfish and actively harm community efforts to prevent the spread.
A week or so ago, the WHO said possibly 800M globally have got the virus. Pro rate that to Canada and we're talking 4M. So if that's true, this virus really is not very deadly to people without preexisting conditons. Or is my math wrong?
Where did the virus come from?I’m referring to the choice to walk around unmasked, to spread conspiracy theories like “The virus is lab-made” and the choice to downplay the severity of this virus when it’s killing people indiscriminately. These choices are all selfish and actively harm community efforts to prevent the spread.
The bigger question is: "What difference does it make?"Where did the virus come from?
That wasn't the questionThe bigger question is: "What difference does it make?"
Wrt our path forward in trying to cope with it, the origin of the virus is irrelevant.
Without having seen the WHO statement in question, I would imagine they are attributing a large part of the unregistered cases to areas with high-population slums that do not have access to reliable healthcare or testing - India, Brazil, South Africa, for example. Despite shortcomings in testing, a place like Canada will have accounted for a lot higher percentage of cases, so yes, your math is quite likely wrong.
That aside, I do agree with you. Blaming society is a pointless endeavour. Looking at this as a long-term problem, I think it is imperative for authorities to find sustainable solutions and not to punish people that are trying to follow guidelines in good faith that it will keep them in business. A cycle of shutting down and opening up is like binge drinking and then swearing off alcohol until the next time - it's not good for the heart.
Where did the virus come from?
Which is why I prefaced my question with the "The bigger question is:"That wasn't the question
There'd have to be quite a bit of analysis into the increase before you could draw any firm conclusions.Are you attributing the increase of deaths primarily due to people succumbing to Covid?
Which is why I prefaced my question with the "The bigger question is:"
There are (obviously) important reasons to investigate and understand the origin of the virus... primarily so that preventative measures can be put in place so that we aren't as likely for it to happen again.
But that's pretty far outside the scope of our current conversation about whether we are doing the right things, or whether our elected leaders are handling the situation well, etc...
And any attempt to link the "it was created in a lab" theory to how we should be handling it is just outright silly.
Exactly my point. So to throw around "300,000 estimated deaths above an expected mortality rate" and attributing it to Covid would be misleadingThere'd have to be quite a bit of analysis into the increase before you could draw any firm conclusions.
But wouldn't Covid be the logical starting point? Is there another phenomenon that would explain the increase?