Hutz
Registered User
- Sep 7, 2007
- 5,070
- 262
Lots of reports of issues with teammates in Buff including Gionta.
I'd also like a link to this. Haven't heard about it myself.
Lots of reports of issues with teammates in Buff including Gionta.
Clarke MacArthur + Matt Puempel for Evander Kane
Hoffman-Turris-Stone
Kane-Brassard-Ryan
Smith-Pageau-Lazar
Many of the previous posts in this thread claim that Murray is trying to get rid of Kane. Many also claim to know exactly what went on in Winnipeg.
You didn't respond to anything else in my post, so I will assume that you take no issue with the rest.
I went back through the thread. A grand total of two people mentioned anything about locker room stuff in Winnipeg. You challenged one of them, and they replied, "I'm tired, you win." So really one person, and that person made no such claim. It was clearly an assumption, and it wasn't even a specific assumption. I'd say the report of Byfuglien throwing Kane's clothes in a shower are good enough to make an assumption that there were problems in their locker room involving Kane.
Oh and one person said that Murray is shopping him. That's it. One person, and they didn't say, "trying to get rid of." They said "shopping him."
Please just stop making things up. People don't agree with your assertion that Ottawa should obtain Kane, if available (you seem to take issue with him even being available since you challenged the person who said he is being shopped). It's no big deal. You don't have to make things up to try to change our minds.
Ok, guy. That's enough from me.
Sens clearly say no. You ask why not. They explained, so accept it or dismiss it but no one is being convinced.
Since the start of the 2013-2014 season
MacArthur has scored at 52pts/82 games. Kane has scored at 49pts/82games
Macarthur has scored at 23g/82 games. Kane has scored at 24g/82 games.
Counter:
Bobby Ryan
For
Evander Kane
Marcus Foligno
2nd
Lots of reports of issues with teammates in Buff including Gionta.
The reason I lost respect for Tim Murray was bringing Kane in. He literally had been kicked off the team by his teammates. He was put in IR and was no longer on the Jets roster. Buffalo was the youngest and worst and most inexperienced team in the league... Why bring in an obvious locker room and off ice cancer to a team that needs leadership and not a completely negative, unprofessional influence.
If somehow Kane ended up in San Jose or Chicago or LA... Or something... At least you really do have a vet experienced team to not get derailed by Kane... And maybe set him right.
Buffalo getting Kane when they did was one of the dumbest NHL moves I can ever remember.
Sabres should suspend him and try to trade or waive him. He needs gone. You don't want him around a fresh and developing team of players.
Buffalo trading for Kane when they did ultimately gave them Eichel. So for Buffalo that alone makes it one of the best trades in their history.
1. If the Jets won the trade, it means Buffalo lost talent. Having less talent means a worse team. A worse team means a better draft pick. Eichel.Sorry what? What is the link with Eichel?
Buffalo acquired :
Evander Kane, Zach Bogosian and Jason Kasdorf
Winnipeg acquired :
Tyler Myers, Drew Stafford, Joel Armia, Brendan Lemieux and a 1st round pick in 2015 (Jack Roslovic)
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade.
1. If the Jets won the trade, it means Buffalo lost talent. Having less talent means a worse team. A worse team means a better draft pick. Eichel.
2. Even if you want to argue that the value was fair on both sides, Kane was injured and out for the rest of the season. Which means the main piece coming back couldn't play during the "tank year". When good players can't play, you have a worse team. A worse team means a better draft pick. Eichel.
Some people think Buffalo may have intentionally made the trade with one of these two points in mind, to ice a worse team, to "tank"... and draft Eichel. Hence, the link between the trade and Eichel.
1. If the Jets won the trade, it means Buffalo lost talent. Having less talent means a worse team. A worse team means a better draft pick. Eichel.
2. Even if you want to argue that the value was fair on both sides, Kane was injured and out for the rest of the season. Which means the main piece coming back couldn't play during the "tank year". When good players can't play, you have a worse team. A worse team means a better draft pick. Eichel.
Some people think Buffalo may have intentionally made the trade with one of these two points in mind, to ice a worse team, to "tank"... and draft Eichel. Hence, the link between the trade and Eichel.
1- Ah ok, sorry but I don't have the "HF mentality", for me "tanking" and getting the highest consolation prize is for LOSERS, and even if you end up winning, you stay a loser
2- whatever floats your boat, losing on purpose sure doesn't float mine.
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade. And I am not even a person who judges trades by "team A won the trade". A trade is trading from a position of strength to address a position of need. In that case, the Jets easily won the trade.
Some also argue that the team that ends up with the best player is the victor.
Kane is not done. He could grow up and shake off all this stuff. He just came off a 20 goal season, so there is no way you can say everything has crumbled for Buffalo. Everyone is having a gossip mongering Twitter field day right now, but what if it all washes away some day? Winnipeg might actually regret this.
Some also argue that the team that ends up with the best player is the victor.
Kane is not done. He could grow up and shake off all this stuff. He just came off a 20 goal season, so there is no way you can say everything has crumbled for Buffalo. Everyone is having a gossip mongering Twitter field day right now, but what if it all washes away some day? Winnipeg might actually regret this.
Kane was addition by subtraction for the Jets, everything else was gravy. They will never regret trading Kane, regardless of Kane becoming a much better player
And no, I'm not saying Kane wasn't good.
1- Ah ok, sorry but I don't have the "HF mentality", for me "tanking" and getting the highest consolation prize is for LOSERS, and even if you end up winning, you stay a loser
2- whatever floats your boat, losing on purpose sure doesn't float mine.
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade. And I am not even a person who judges trades by "team A won the trade". A trade is trading from a position of strength to address a position of need. In that case, the Jets easily won the trade.
Some also argue that the team that ends up with the best player is the victor.
Kane is not done. He could grow up and shake off all this stuff. He just came off a 20 goal season, so there is no way you can say everything has crumbled for Buffalo. Everyone is having a gossip mongering Twitter field day right now, but what if it all washes away some day? Winnipeg might actually regret this.
All I did was explain the connection between the trade and Eichel, and the rationale of some fans. I never said I agree or disagree with it. If you really need to get combative with neutral strangers online to lift yourself up, then I dunno what to say. Kind of feel sorry for you.1- Ah ok, sorry but I don't have the "HF mentality", for me "tanking" and getting the highest consolation prize is for LOSERS, and even if you end up winning, you stay a loser
2- whatever floats your boat, losing on purpose sure doesn't float mine.
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade. And I am not even a person who judges trades by "team A won the trade". A trade is trading from a position of strength to address a position of need. In that case, the Jets easily won the trade.
Some also argue that the team that ends up with the best player is the victor.
Kane is not done. He could grow up and shake off all this stuff. He just came off a 20 goal season, so there is no way you can say everything has crumbled for Buffalo. Everyone is having a gossip mongering Twitter field day right now, but what if it all washes away some day? Winnipeg might actually regret this.
Hahaha. Winnipeg finished 25th overall last season. Keep telling yourself they are doing fine.
So you're part of the morally superior crowd I see? Good to know.
Just so you know, moral superiority doesn't get you cups, and no one cares that you think you're better because you disagree with tanking.
All I did was explain the connection between the trade and Eichel, and the rationale of some fans. I never said I agree or disagree with it. If you really need to get combative with neutral strangers online to lift yourself up, then I dunno what to say. Kind of feel sorry for you.
Sorry what? What is the link with Eichel?
Buffalo acquired :
Evander Kane, Zach Bogosian and Jason Kasdorf
Winnipeg acquired :
Tyler Myers, Drew Stafford, Joel Armia, Brendan Lemieux and a 1st round pick in 2015 (Jack Roslovic)
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade.
1- Ah ok, sorry but I don't have the "HF mentality", for me "tanking" and getting the highest consolation prize is for LOSERS, and even if you end up winning, you stay a loser
2- whatever floats your boat, losing on purpose sure doesn't float mine.
The Jets absolutely killed it with this trade. And I am not even a person who judges trades by "team A won the trade". A trade is trading from a position of strength to address a position of need. In that case, the Jets easily won the trade.