Value of: Evan Rodrigues

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,405
84,633
Redmond, WA
I think this is more of a thought experiment than anything else, because I doubt the Penguins move him. If you're not familiar with Evan Rodrigues, he's basically a depth center/winger that is somehow destroying hockey this year and breaking analytics. Prior to this year, Rodrigues had 34 goals and 86 points in 234 games, which is a pace of about 30 points per 82 games. This year, he has 8 goals and 19 points in 27 games, which is a pace of 58 points per 82 games. In addition to the production, he's putting up analytics results that a player of his ability really shouldn't be putting up:





ERod has always been an analytics darling even dating back to Buffalo, but this is obscene even for him. This isn't even a result of him playing with elite players, he's doing this mostly as a play driving center.

But this thread was to ask another question: how would a team value a player in this kind of situation? He's a guy that is just comically outperforming his assumed abilities, but he's still putting up absolutely phenomenal results. I'm trying to figure out how a team would value a guy in this kind of situation.
 

Akrapovince

Registered User
May 19, 2017
3,823
4,243
I think this is more of a thought experiment than anything else, because I doubt the Penguins move him. If you're not familiar with Evan Rodrigues, he's basically a depth center/winger that is somehow destroying hockey this year and breaking analytics. Prior to this year, Rodrigues had 34 goals and 86 points in 234 games, which is a pace of about 30 points per 82 games. This year, he has 8 goals and 19 points in 27 games, which is a pace of 58 points per 82 games. In addition to the production, he's putting up analytics results that a player of his ability really shouldn't be putting up:





ERod has always been an analytics darling even dating back to Buffalo, but this is obscene even for him. This isn't even a result of him playing with elite players, he's doing this mostly as a play driving center.

But this thread was to ask another question: how would a team value a player in this kind of situation? He's a guy that is just comically outperforming his assumed abilities, but he's still putting up absolutely phenomenal results. I'm trying to figure out how a team would value a guy in this kind of situation.


How do we determine whether a player is outplaying his ability or taking the next step as a player?

Obviously has a huge body of work that we can refer to and it’s not common for a player to breakout at 28, but is there any analytical data that we can rely upon to tell the difference in this case?

New to analytics so just trying to learn a bit
 
  • Like
Reactions: banks

Empoleon8771

Registered User
Aug 25, 2015
84,405
84,633
Redmond, WA
How do we determine whether a player is outplaying his ability or taking the next step as a player?

Obviously has a huge body of work that we can refer to and it’s not common for a player to breakout at 28, but is there any analytical data that we can rely upon to tell the difference in this case?

New to analytics so just trying to learn a bit

I don't think there is a way to do that with analytics. His analytics just say he's been playing amazingly well this year, but I don't think analytics are that predicative of future success, especially not in such a small sample size.

It's why I think it's tough to put a valuation here. He's a player that's wildly outperforming his perceived ability, so it's tough to gauge where he would fall.
 

Akrapovince

Registered User
May 19, 2017
3,823
4,243
I don't think there is a way to do that with analytics. His analytics just say he's been playing amazingly well this year, but I don't think analytics are that predicative of future success, especially not in such a small sample size.

It's why I think it's tough to put a valuation here. He's a player that's wildly outperforming his perceived ability, so it's tough to gauge where he would fall.

At the same time I don’t think it’s inconceivable under certain circumstance for him to go from a 30 point player to a consistent 40-50 point guy, given he’a always putting up decent advanced stats.

One of those situations where I don’t the value that Pens will get can cover off what he could potentially be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Empoleon8771

Filthy Dangles

Registered User*
Sponsor
Oct 23, 2014
29,463
41,582
I doubt he'd be valued around the league close to what penguins would want to even think about trading him

I don't think i'd want the Rangers to give up either their 2nd or STL's 2nd for him as an example.
 

DickSmehlik

Registered User
Oct 23, 2006
3,792
3,847
The Empire State
The bigger question should be are the Pens willing to pay him the significant raise that he is going to be asking for this off-season?

He's probably going to ask for what? $3.5 million a year.
 

SundherDome

Y'all have to much power
Jul 6, 2009
14,926
6,969
Minneapolis,MN
The bigger question should be are the Pens willing to pay him the significant raise that he is going to be asking for this off-season?

He's probably going to ask for what? $3.5 million a year.
I think he is going to look at Fabbri deal and jump it 500k. 3 years 4.5 is reasonable. Trade value would be a late 2nd or third and mid range prospect
 

orby

Registered User
Jun 16, 2013
6,840
5,494
Erie, PA
www.youtube.com
If the Pens are planning on competing this year, which I think they are, I think they will probably just hold onto him and let some other team overpay him next year in free agency.

If they're sellers at the deadline, I can see him getting something like a mid round pick and a decent prospect. I don't think anyone is gonna give up a high pick for a guy who's looked like a 3rd/4th line tweener for years and has been playing above that level for like 30 games total.
 

Chainshot

Give 'em Enough Rope
Sponsor
Feb 28, 2002
153,669
106,647
Tarnation
He tended to have excellent underlying metrics in Buffalo too, but he rarely had steady linemates/icetime. It could be that with the stability and ToI, he's getting production.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad