tanti9
Registered User
- Dec 18, 2023
- 55
- 32
Who do you think are the top management groups when it comes to evaluating talent? Is it just a flip of the coin? Does a team need a strong foundation for new players coming in?
Every team has their hits and misses but it does seem to be a crapshoot for most. The team I follow closely is Vancouver and have had more hits (Joshua, Suter, Blueger, etc) than misses (Stillman, Dickinson, Lazar, Desharnis(?), etc). You cannot say that Vancouver had a strong foundation either at the beginning of last year until Tocchet got most on the same page.
99% of this board are just mostly fans with varying opinions and have a "homers" view when looking at teams and players. This past summer sooo many "insiders" and hockey specialists were hyping Nashville's signings and look where they are now. Maybe Nashville turns it around, who knows.
I believe that a good management group is one that is proactive rather than reactive and if a player is not fitting in then they are not afraid to ship "their" player out and correcting their mistake.
Every team has their hits and misses but it does seem to be a crapshoot for most. The team I follow closely is Vancouver and have had more hits (Joshua, Suter, Blueger, etc) than misses (Stillman, Dickinson, Lazar, Desharnis(?), etc). You cannot say that Vancouver had a strong foundation either at the beginning of last year until Tocchet got most on the same page.
99% of this board are just mostly fans with varying opinions and have a "homers" view when looking at teams and players. This past summer sooo many "insiders" and hockey specialists were hyping Nashville's signings and look where they are now. Maybe Nashville turns it around, who knows.
I believe that a good management group is one that is proactive rather than reactive and if a player is not fitting in then they are not afraid to ship "their" player out and correcting their mistake.