I've been watching; I wonder who kills penalties in their place?
So far, losing Fast hasn’t had too much of an effect as he was on the third PK unit, which is only on the ice a little bit. He has been replaced there by Drury, who isn’t as good as Fast but is still within the comfort zone for that role.
In that limited role, Drury did become a negative factor on the Isles’ PPG in game 4, losing the faceoff and getting jammed in his defensive lane. It’s not a huge deal but a thing to keep an eye on.
For Pesce, it appears Orlov has graduated up as the replacement to pair with Skjei. That’s not ideal as it puts two LHD on the ice, not to mention Orlov being a less stout PK’er than Pesce. When Orlov took a penalty, his former 3rd-pair-PK partner Chatfield was the next man up to take his place. In the small sample, they have notably not used a 3rd defensive pair at all, so the biggest long-term impact might be the increased workload on Slavin-Burns as they skate a couple more shifts per game.
They played in years past and the PK got smoked anyway in series losses.
I think we’re in an era in which an elite PP can just overwhelm even the best PK. Edmonton humiliating the #2 RS PK in the league exemplifies that.
The Rangers are talented enough to do that. Canes need to show that the PP is for real. Another 30/10 split makes for an uphill climb.
I don’t agree. In a tight series, allowing even just one more PPG against could be the end of your season. Depth at those PK positions is crucial, and in particular, losing a key PK defenseman is a needle-moving issue.