chicago will loose this series like anaheim was vs the stonewall babcock trap. they can't outskill datsyuk, don't use the bodys and can't beat howard. 3rd and 4th line garbage get destroyed by the wings counter parts. chicago is even worse because of crappy crawford. hiller was winning some games for anaheim at least.
so what would be a better fit for the finals, kings or sharks. i would prefer the sharks since the kings are very hard to play. shutting down the first line will not help vs the kings that much since unlike chicago and anaheim they have a good depth.
on the other hand the odds are slim stats wise for the kings to repeat the cup win. so maybe they would loose to the wings. but thats more voodoo thinking.
both teams are using their bodys.
chicago and anaheim were more the soft teams trying to outskill dats and zetterberg.
i cant see the next team stepping in the same trap like chicago and anaheim did.
your thoughts?
so what would be a better fit for the finals, kings or sharks. i would prefer the sharks since the kings are very hard to play. shutting down the first line will not help vs the kings that much since unlike chicago and anaheim they have a good depth.
on the other hand the odds are slim stats wise for the kings to repeat the cup win. so maybe they would loose to the wings. but thats more voodoo thinking.
both teams are using their bodys.
chicago and anaheim were more the soft teams trying to outskill dats and zetterberg.
i cant see the next team stepping in the same trap like chicago and anaheim did.
your thoughts?
.
