Toggle sidebar

Buffalo Bills Divisional: (3) Baltimore at (2) Buffalo; Sunday 1/19 @ 6:30 PM ET, CBS

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Jim Bob said:
www.espn.com

49ers' Aiyuk tears ACL, MCL; Deebo in hospital

49ers wide receiver Brandon Aiyuk suffered a torn ACL and MCL in Sunday's loss to the Chiefs, while Deebo Samuel is hospitalized with a form of pneumonia.
www.espn.com www.espn.com



A few thoughts:

Hopefully Aiyuk and Samuel get healthy. But, this is why Aiyuk wanted to get paid.

Thank goodness Beane got the Cooper deal done when he did.

I wonder if the 49ers turn into sellers at the deadline...

https://x.com/i/web/status/1848402886528479513
Click to expand...

Honestly I save a bunch using Booking.com. The only two sites I use are that and Hilton Honors.
 
A quick look at Seattle:

Looks like running on them won't be a huge issue.

Atlanta has a non existent pass rush, so Geno was able to sit back pretty comfortably. We should be able to make him less comfortable.

Seattle is a good team, but if Metcalf is out, Buffalo should be able to win this game. There is always the west coast factor, but Seattle is coming back from Atlanta last week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL and SwordsgoneWild
TehDoak said:
A quick look at Seattle:

Looks like running on them won't be a huge issue.

Atlanta has a non existent pass rush, so Geno was able to sit back pretty comfortably. We should be able to make him less comfortable.

Seattle is a good team, but if Metcalf is out, Buffalo should be able to win this game. There is always the west coast factor, but Seattle is coming back from Atlanta last week.
Click to expand...
Seattle is the very definition of Jekyll and Hyde. They looked great beating the Dolphins and Falcons.....and looked absolutely awful in their losses to the Giants, Niners and Lions.

Geno is just mobile enough that the D-line can't get out of their lanes.....but also just accurate enough that giving him time is dangerous. And they run the ball well enough that it can hurt us.

Their defense isn't great though. Their pass defense is their strength as they have a good secondary and can rush the passer. As you said, they can be run on.


I'm guessing a higher-scoring, close game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwordsgoneWild
Jim Bob said:
So far in 2024:

DE X: 4.0 sacks 17 tackles 7 TFL 9 QB Hits
DE Y: 4.0 sacks 15 tackles 3 TFL 8 QB Hits
DE Z: 3.5 sacks 22 tackles 6 TFL 13 QB Hits

Who do you want?

X is Myles Garrett, Y is AJ Epenesa, and Z is Greg Rousseau
Click to expand...
13 QB hits is nuts,but he just had 6 on Sunday playing against maybe the worst backup tackle in the NFL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValJamesDuex
I'm not saying I would move heaven and earth for Garrett. In fact I probably lean towards the price likely being too much draft capital. But I do think some of you are underrating the caliber of player he is. Like he's squarely in the "best non QB in the nfl" conversation. He'd instantly be our second best player.

But I don't think it's happening. I just can't see Beane parting with the kind of draft picks it would take.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SECRET SQUIRREL, buffa dud and My Cozen Dylan
Husko said:
I'm not saying I would move heaven and earth for Garrett. In fact I probably lean towards the price likely being too much draft capital. But I do think some of you are underrating the caliber of player he is. Like he's squarely in the "best non QB in the nfl" conversation. He'd instantly be our second best player.

But I don't think it's happening. I just can't see Beane parting with the kind of draft picks it would take.
Click to expand...
He's not playing to that level so far this season.

It could be that like with Cooper, the issues with the team are dragging him down. But, he hasn't been the same game wrecker he's been most of his career so far in 2024.
 
I think the Garrett value would be in the eventual game against a Mahomes or Jackson level qb when the pass rush dries up from the usual suspects. That’s not to say that our current guys are bad, they’re just not elite and one reason is consistency.

With that said, I can’t imagine he’s the sort of guy they could add for a reasonable price, and if not, I don’t think this is the year to splash like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValJamesDuex
Kupp, however, would be a really interesting add if they aren’t sure about the WR room, but what does that look like functionally? I think Shakir loses snaps on the inside before Coleman on the outside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ValJamesDuex
zenthusiast said:
Kupp, however, would be a really interesting add if they aren’t sure about the WR room, but what does that look like functionally? I think Shakir loses snaps on the inside before Coleman on the outside.
Click to expand...
Wouldn't Kupp and Shakir be redundant or does Kupp play outside more with Nacua there now (when healthy) ?
 
Last edited:
Kupp plays on the outside but he also moves around a lot. He is what we all wanted Samuel to be. You would have 4 dangerous receivers that could all be moved around and really help Josh read a defense pre-snap with movement.
 
SundherDome said:
Kupp plays on the outside but he also moves around a lot. He is what we all wanted Samuel to be. You would have 4 dangerous receivers that could all be moved around and really help Josh read a defense pre-snap with movement.
Click to expand...
It’s unfortunate that didn’t even think of Samuel for my previous post. He didn’t suddenly start sucking ass, but I don’t have faith he’s going to be anything for us either.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom