GhostofKenKlee
Guest
Ok, first of all, you have no evidence to back your claim that he has no sources with the Devils. Second, a journalist isn't obligated to give up his sources, it's actually the opposite. Third, I keep asking you what big events he's missed and you haven't cited any examples. The only one I can think of is the Vanderbeek example.
Frankly, TG isn't asked to do intense investigative journalism. Nobody expects him to be Woodward and Bernstein so I'm not sure the type of standard you would like to hold him to. Just that he gets his facts and his reporting right, which he undeniably does.
Intense Journalism, you are right he seems to do the bare minimum if that.
I listed them, you must of missed them.
I gave the big "events":
Kovalchuk
Lou stepping down as GM
Lou leaving the organization
Vanderbeek
Financial Woes
Team for sale
New Owners.
Those are actually big events. That's not investigative journalism...
How about other stuff that other writers in other markets get?
Yeah, if a beat writer misses those and or is choosing to sit on the story, you make up your own mind. Oh, Lou didn't let anything leak out that must be it. If that's you r stance, why bother with beat writers? Just get the in house media guy to spoon feed you what they want you know.
Woodward and Bernstein, interesting. It seems you making excuses for the lack or justifying the lack of coverage. It's ok, you should try and read coverage of other teams in other sports once in awhile (if you don't already). Better yet, go read what the Flyers/Rangers and other market teams writers cover. Go see what the Hab writers or Leafs writer come up with.