Multiple things going on here.
1)yes we need an (at least) average goalie, but we still need to acquire said goalie.
2)bad vs average vs good goaltending is one topic of discussion. Aged and expensive is another.
3) Rags are going to beat a better team on the back of superior goal tending.
All this said, I've been a proponent of Allen and Kahk going into next season. Or at least I have been open to the option.
Fitz doesn't seem to into the idea though.
1 and 2 have nothing with 10 OA.
Shestyorkin is young enough, under team control, their home grown talent, still cant win before they grow some of their talent and structure their game. You are again trying to use one specific example, Shestyorkin is very good, rangers are doing things, Nashville with Saros dont, Markstrom is off, Hellebyuck is doing nothing in the play-off, Vasilevsky was 3 time finalist, now he is off. BECAUSE his team lost of their depth. Because Vancouver with their third goalie is more talented team. Because Calgary is toilet paper. Because Jets are playin on the shoulders of Hellebyuck and when Colorado is loading him, they cant do shift after shift on the good level to win the game. Because Shestyorkin is playing behind experienced but still young enough team with very good depth and better structure they played before.
Daccord stands on his head this season. Freaking massive performance. But Seattle will pick with us with the same amount of points.
Goalies should be average. Colorado are playing with below average goaltending, Toronto, Hurricanes, Tampa this season, Dallas had average goaltending this season overall. Seattle, Blues, Jets - above average goaltending this season.
Goalies are not as important as depth and structure. And as talent. Devils would be play off team this year if they had more healthy roster this year. Vanecek had 17-9-3 this season. Walking goalie disaster.