Deadspin: Where Did the Kings' Offense Come From?

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

Ziggy Stardust

Master Debater
Jul 25, 2002
63,878
36,139
Parts Unknown
http://deadspin.com/where-did-the-k...source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

Excerpt:
They had 141 goals in 59 games, or 2.4 a night. That was good for 26th in the league, ahead of only Calgary, Florida, New Jersey, and Buffalo, a murder victims' row of teams that couldn't score if their lives depended on it. Despite this, they sat 12th in the league with 68 points in those 59 games, only a 94.5-point pace.

Today, they're scoring a hell of a lot more. They ended the regular season with 206 goals, meaning they scored 65 over their final 23 games, at 2.82 per night (which, by the way, still isn't a lot). They also ended the season with 100 points, so their pace over the final month-and-a-half of the season was better than 114 points.

The scoring, and the winning, continued in the postseason, including last night's 6-2 comeback over the Blackhawks to even up the Western Conference final at one game apiece. Their 3.25 goals per game is tops among all playoff teams.

So, what changed? The most commonly cited reason is the trade for Marian Gaborik. Pretty convenient, really, because the Kings' offense took off right around the time the Olympic break ended, and he was acquired five games after that (please ignore that the Kings scored 18 goals in those five games).
 
Easy... Pearson was brought up and put in the top 6 after the Olympic break. I'm not saying it is all Pearson, more it is the no grinders in the top 6. After the Olympic break I believe Nolan had 1 game in the top 6 the week or 2 after in the top 6 and again in the first few Sharks games.

The addition of Gaborik also spread out the Kings offense. Before the Kings maybe had 1 dangerous line that would go up against the other teams top line. Now if you want to shut down the Kings first line, the 2/3 lines are scoring threats as well.

Oh yeah and abandoning the Kings snail slow break out plan.

Honorable mention to Crawford :laugh:
 
Easy... Pearson was brought up and put in the top 6 after the Olympic break. I'm not saying it is all Pearson, more it is the no grinders in the top 6. After the Olympic break I believe Nolan had 1 game in the top 6 the week or 2 after in the top 6 and again in the first few Sharks games.

The addition of Gaborik also spread out the Kings offense. Before the Kings maybe had 1 dangerous line that would go up against the other teams top line. Now if you want to shut down the Kings first line, the 2/3 lines are scoring threats as well.

Oh yeah and abandoning the Kings snail slow break out plan.

Honorable mention to Crawford :laugh:

Imo its the system. The system requires high energy that just can't be sustained over a full season. The kings feast on turnovers from a heavy forecheck, thus when they play with more energy the scoring goes up. This is the reason they have struggled against the hawks as well since they have a very mobile defensive group.

Of course adding gabs helped a ton. It should be interesting with carter now appearing to be healthier if the kings can take advantage of having 2 great snipers playing on different lines...
 
In that third period it seemed like the defense of the Hawks slipped alot. We had several odd man rushes in the third that wet my whistle.
 
I have asked myself and others including JackF if they had any opinions on our ability to find O at times without any problem and how the style of how we execute our system seems to be evolving and everyone points to the system and how when we play it to a T it forces other teams to make mistakes that we can capitalize on.

That may be true but it cant be the entire truth. I mean before Gabby came to the team we had a much harder time finding so much balance to our game which is where I see our O coming from, team balance.

But even then you have to see the impact that having Carter moved to C and having TT and TP as his wingers as playing a HUGE part of the way things have changed too. Likely it is a combination of all of these things and more but in the end this team sure seems to have taken its game up another notch.

I thought we had the horses before the playoffs started but any doubt has been removed. I mean every team can always get better but we sure look more than capable of winning things today. More so then we did a couple of months ago.
 
Kings are just a weird team. There's really no definite answer. They're strange.
 
The addition of Gaborik and bringing up Toffoli and Pearson and shifting Carter to C suddenly gave this team a huge boost in depth.

This is the lineup that opened the season for the Kings:

King-Kopitar-Williams
Frattin-Richards-Carter
Brown-Stoll-Lewis
Clifford-Fraser-Nolan

Regehr-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Muzzin-Greene

Quick-Scrivens

Scratches: Carcillo, Martinez


Changes to the lineup have made the biggest difference. Look at how weak that opening night lineup is compared to this:

Gaborik-Kopitar-Brown
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Richards-Williams
Clifford-Stoll-Lewis

Muzzin-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Martinez-Greene

Quick-Jones

Scratches: Nolan, Schultz, Regehr (inj.)

In a matter of months, those changes made the team younger, faster, and a lot more difficult to defend against. That wasn't the case with this team up until the Olympic break.
 
Pixie dust.

In that third period it seemed like the defense of the Hawks slipped alot. We had several odd man rushes in the third that wet my whistle.

This is it, imo. In addition to our high-pressure game we're able to really bear down in the playoffs...and in both games in this series you've seen the team with the lead get a chance to absolutely bury the other team when they start trying to take chances.
 
Catalyst -

i
 
The addition of Gaborik and bringing up Toffoli and Pearson and shifting Carter to C suddenly gave this team a huge boost in depth.

This is the lineup that opened the season for the Kings:
I do believe acquiring Gaborik was the key to balancing out the lines.

King-Kopitar-Williams
Frattin-Richards-Carter
Brown-Stoll-Lewis
Clifford-Fraser-Nolan

Regehr-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Muzzin-Greene

Quick-Scrivens

Scratches: Carcillo, Martinez


Changes to the lineup have made the biggest difference. Look at how weak that opening night lineup is compared to this:

Gaborik-Kopitar-Brown
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Richards-Williams
Clifford-Stoll-Lewis

Muzzin-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Martinez-Greene

Quick-Jones

Scratches: Nolan, Schultz, Regehr (inj.)

In a matter of months, those changes made the team younger, faster, and a lot more difficult to defend against. That wasn't the case with this team up until the Olympic break.

I really liked the King-Stoll-Brown line and we switched to these lines I feel Kings that much better.

Gaborik-Kopitar-Williams
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Stoll-Brown
Clifford-Richards-Lewis
 
The addition of Gaborik and bringing up Toffoli and Pearson and shifting Carter to C suddenly gave this team a huge boost in depth.

This is the lineup that opened the season for the Kings:

King-Kopitar-Williams
Frattin-Richards-Carter
Brown-Stoll-Lewis
Clifford-Fraser-Nolan

Regehr-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Muzzin-Greene

Quick-Scrivens

Scratches: Carcillo, Martinez


Changes to the lineup have made the biggest difference. Look at how weak that opening night lineup is compared to this:

Gaborik-Kopitar-Brown
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Richards-Williams
Clifford-Stoll-Lewis

Muzzin-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Martinez-Greene

Quick-Jones

Scratches: Nolan, Schultz, Regehr (inj.)

In a matter of months, those changes made the team younger, faster, and a lot more difficult to defend against. That wasn't the case with this team up until the Olympic break.

Its funny looking back at this. We all had so much hope that Frattin would come in and fill that 2nd line LW spot. He turned out to be a huge non-factor and scratched most of the time. The addition of Gaborik and the emergence of Pearson/Toffoli has made a world of difference. I'm hoping DL finds a way to keep Gaborik. He helps make that top line lethal...
 
It's just that we have more creativity now. We actually have players (Carter, Gabby, Kopi, Top Titty, Pears, Stick) that can make those plays in tight situations. No longer do we have Brown or King on the wings losing the puck as soon as they are pressured. We had absolutely no offensive skill on the wings, and now we have a ton more.
 
The offense starts with the defense. Martinez and Muzzin stepping up, pressure was relieved from Doughty too. Then add two scorers, the move of Carter back to center...that made our middle stronger on the offensive side...Pearson keeping up with Carter made for a dangerous 2nd line. Toffoli pushed Williams down along with Brown going to the first line...we all know about Williams' success.

Gabby gets two credits...not only igniting Kopitar but finally fixing the PP1 unit. And the push down from that unit made the PP2 better as well.


Basically Lombardi and Sutter are evil geniuses.
 
Sutter is the Canadian Zen Master that mainly communicates through facial expressions and telepathy.
 
Gabs plus the two kids ready for the primetime.


Gaborik is a perfect fit with Anze, and he's produced beautifully (as well as upped Kopitar's game.).

Pearson has 9 points in 14 games, Toffoli with 9 points in 16 games, and those haven't been empty points either. We're talking huge plays from both of them. Sutter put them alongside Carts and you get a damn good second line.
 
This team has so much confidence in themselves they know they can just turn it on. Personally, I don't even think they give a rat's ass about the regular season until the last 25 games or so.
 
Like most things, it's probably a combination of factors.

Adding Gaborik definitely helped. Adding Toffoli and Pearson did as well. Then the line changes.

On top of that, even though some of the vets aren't the fastest guys around, there is a lot of mental toughness going around and they don't seem to be phased when the going gets roughed. If anything, it seems like they have trouble getting up for the game until it's on the line - like those boxers and MMA fighters who don't feel like they're at their best until they get punched in the face.

If they can just keep the little mental mistakes to a minimum - the poor passes, the offsides, and bad penalties - this teams got a great shot at taking the whole burrito.
 
The addition of Gaborik and bringing up Toffoli and Pearson and shifting Carter to C suddenly gave this team a huge boost in depth.

This is the lineup that opened the season for the Kings:

King-Kopitar-Williams
Frattin-Richards-Carter
Brown-Stoll-Lewis
Clifford-Fraser-Nolan

Regehr-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Muzzin-Greene

Quick-Scrivens

Scratches: Carcillo, Martinez


Changes to the lineup have made the biggest difference. Look at how weak that opening night lineup is compared to this:

Gaborik-Kopitar-Brown
Pearson-Carter-Toffoli
King-Richards-Williams
Clifford-Stoll-Lewis

Muzzin-Doughty
Mitchell-Voynov
Martinez-Greene

Quick-Jones

Scratches: Nolan, Schultz, Regehr (inj.)

In a matter of months, those changes made the team younger, faster, and a lot more difficult to defend against. That wasn't the case with this team up until the Olympic break.




LoL, I still want Frattin back! LoL, the dude hit 14 goal posts....... He was gunna be good here....... :cry:



:laugh:
 
There are a select few of us that were banging the Carter at 2C drum since July of last year while I was rolling out projected lineups with Toffoli attached to Carter's hip. Laughed at those that said "Can't have two shooters on the same line" then and I laugh even harder now.

Both guys have great shots; however, it doesn't mean they aren't gifted offensive players that can make passes as well. Still can't believe some people and there NES Hockey way of thinking.

Gaborik addition is huge, obviously, but the main thing for me is that this team has a second line that produces as opposed to a Richards-led 2nd line that is busy fishing the puck out of its own net...especially when Carter was put up with Kopitar and all of the eggs were in one basket.
 
There are a select few of us that were banging the Carter at 2C drum since July of last year while I was rolling out projected lineups with Toffoli attached to Carter's hip. Laughed at those that said "Can't have two shooters on the same line" then and I laugh even harder now.

Both guys have great shots; however, it doesn't mean they aren't gifted offensive players that can make passes as well. Still can't believe some people and there NES Hockey way of thinking.

Gaborik addition is huge, obviously, but the main thing for me is that this team has a second line that produces as opposed to a Richards-led 2nd line that is busy fishing the puck out of its own net...especially when Carter was put up with Kopitar and all of the eggs were in one basket.

I think some of us encouraged it thinking of line names and such
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad