Egresch
Registered User
- Jul 10, 2022
- 927
- 1,279
He reminds me of someone like Slavin. Not flashy, but there is a reason he will earn 90M during his NHL career.
that just seems like BS. So Hutson has the green light to do spin-o-ramas and risky dekes at the blueline, but they told Reinbacher to settle down and not stand out?
Makes perfect sense.that just seems like BS. So Hutson has the green light to do spin-o-ramas and risky dekes at the blueline, but they told Reinbacher to settle down and not stand out?
Makes perfect sense.
You know how many people are saying he's the future on the PP, even though the scouts say he's a 3-4 dman? So why did we burn a pick at 5 for a guy that can't QB the PP ? Shutdown Dmen aren't that hard to findThey told Reinbacher to be himself which isn't dipsy doodles.. they didn't draft him to QB PP1. They have been showing him footage of Shea Weber.
Well not to me lol
You know how many people are saying he's the future on the PP, even though the scouts say he's a 3-4 dman? So why did we burn a pick at 5 for a guy that can't QB the PP ? Shutdown Dmen aren't that hard to find
And you know scouts are never wrong.Well not to me lol
You know how many people are saying he's the future on the PP, even though the scouts say he's a 3-4 dman? So why did we burn a pick at 5 for a guy that can't QB the PP ? Shutdown Dmen aren't that hard to find
who are these scoutsWell not to me lol
You know how many people are saying he's the future on the PP, even though the scouts say he's a 3-4 dman? So why did we burn a pick at 5 for a guy that can't QB the PP ? Shutdown Dmen aren't that hard to find
Well not to me lol
You know how many people are saying he's the future on the PP, even though the scouts say he's a 3-4 dman? So why did we burn a pick at 5 for a guy that can't QB the PP ? Shutdown Dmen aren't that hard to find
That's a hard one...
Because no one is actually saying he is the future on the PP and no serious scouts say he's a 3-4 dman.
The amount of posters who believe that is so weird.simply think that being a 1-2D requires being a dipsy doodle artist who puts up a bunch of points and don't even know they are supposed to defend.
He also said last year Maillloux was the most NHL ready prospectNot sure if he's been mentioned yet, Francis Booboo said that Reinbacher was just 'ok' at camp, despite Reinbacher saying he was told not to try anything fancy.
He did add that he's not worried and give him time
I personally don't expect a shutdown RHD to also be a PP point producer. Sure, it would be nice if he could, but I want him focused on stopping the other team's top offensive players at 5on5 and when we're on the PK. If Reinbacher had also been a big time point producer at he RHD position, he would have challenged Bedard for #1 overall.Are you kidding? Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
Hey son, did you miss me?Actually you are a gentleman, I agree, and stop using big words or I'll get @OldCraig71 to pull out his paperback thesaurus
Yea because Hutson’s game to be effective is completely different than Redenbacher - Hutson is there to generate offense not “play Defense”that just seems like BS. So Hutson has the green light to do spin-o-ramas and risky dekes at the blueline, but they told Reinbacher to settle down and not stand out?
Rick Green was what a 1OA, Scott Stevens also 5OA?Are you kidding? Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
Are you kidding?
Now that's a completely different take, it went from the claim of many people seeing him as the future of the PP to your expectation of what a 5OA should provide to the team.Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
What I expect from a top-pairing D drafted 5OA is 24-26 TOI a game. Not that concerned with his point totals. Is that unreasonable?There's 0 people saying he's the future on the PP and anyone saying he's a 3-4 D man are just those who are mad that they didn't pick Michkov or simply think that being a 1-2D requires being a dipsy doodle artist who puts up a bunch of points and don't even know they are supposed to defend.
They used a top 5 pick because big, rangy, smooth skating, right shot defenseman, with puck poise, high IQ and plus offensive attributes are a scarcity.
They are trying to build a winning team, not have the highest point producing simulations in EA sports.
Watch someone like Ryan Suter or Jacob Slavin play defense and tell me they aren't/weren't top 2 defenseman.
You should take a look at defensemen drafted in the the top 10... you're expectations might change lolAre you kidding? Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
Some guys get drafted high and don’t end up big point producers but still have incredibly long careers. Sure I’d love him to be the next Larry Robinson but if he contributes in a significant way to the teams success, no one will care.That's my line.
Now that's a completely different take, it went from the claim of many people seeing him as the future of the PP to your expectation of what a 5OA should provide to the team.
The original claim is just blatantly false so we'll skip over that.
The 2nd part is your opinion and everything goes here, If you believe being a PP QB should be an absolute requirement to be drafted top5, then so be it.
That said, not being a PP QB doesn't make one a 3-4 dman.
What I expect from a top-pairing D is 24-26 TOI a game. Is that unreasonable?
Are you kidding? Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
Go to the Hawks forum and see how many think Korchinski will still have PP1 despite drafting Levshunov, then come back here and apologize. You're making a problem out of your own bizarre assumption.Are you kidding? Are we going to pretend the expectation @5th overall isn't going to help the PP?
Go to the Hawks forum and see how many think Korchinski will still have PP1 despite drafting Levshunov, then come back here and apologize. You're making a problem out of your own bizarre assumption.