Adriatic
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2004
- 6,748
- 4,616
A good year in Laval will be great for him. He really has all the tools.
I didn't see reinbacher play today and I'm not buying the doom, But I caught a bit of michkov and man he is the real deal he looks so special. Imagine michkov and demidov....I was very wrong about Michkov wanting to stay in Russia. I thought he would be there for 5-6 years like Kaprizov and maybe Putin would pay him to stay longer..
Now i am admitting that I was wrong as were the Habs
yep outside of a 5 minutes sequence in the middle of the 2nd period after we scored our 2nd goal we dominated that game from A to Z. Only their first line did ok all other 3 lines were dominated. When Hutson was on the ice there was no game just one team playing. Richard's 3 beer league goals skewed the result of this game.The score would have been 10-0 if we switched goalies and this place would be planning the parade.
I didn't see reinbacher play today and I'm not buying the doom, But I caught a bit of michkov and man he is the real deal he looks so special. Imagine michkov and demidov....
They do seem like a very good pairing...I think Reimbacher's effective but non-flashy style will be a perfect complement to Hutson, who's as flashy as they get but a nightmare for his defensive partner. Gets caught deep in the O-zone all the time and takes chances at the O blue line... Reinbacher can cover him
yep outside of a 5 minutes sequence in the middle of the 2nd period after we scored our 2nd goal we dominated that game from A to Z. Only their first line did ok all other 3 lines were dominated. When Hutson was on the ice there was no game just one team playing. Richard's 3 beer league goals skewed the result of this game.
I think Reimbacher's effective but non-flashy style will be a perfect complement to Hutson, who's as flashy as they get but a nightmare for his defensive partner. Gets caught deep in the O-zone all the time and takes chances at the O blue line... Reinbacher can cover him
I have a feeling that Xekhaj, Reinbacher would be a better NHL pairing this year.Thats one of the reason I wouldnt have problem to keep 8 dman.
Lets making something like :
Matheson / Guhle
Hutson / Savard
Xhekaj / Mailloux
Struble / Barron
And you keep rolling Hutson, Xhekaj, Mailloux, Struble, Barron. Their effectiveness will dictate their icetime.
This is not a problem imo if those guys don’t play all the 82 games
You have not admitted anything before being caught on your contradictions.I was very wrong about Michkov wanting to stay in Russia. I thought he would be there for 5-6 years like Kaprizov and maybe Putin would pay him to stay longer..
Now i am admitting that I was wrong as were the Habs
Honestly I used to think that too but I don't think so anymore. Michkov is too good, has me salivating lol. We'd figure the D out some other way but hopefully reinbacher turns into a stud. He has the tools to become that. For me anything less than a stud D will hurt lolBe great if you want Toronto success.
Honestly I used to think that too but I don't think so anymore. Michkov is too good, has me salivating lol. We'd figure the D out some other way but hopefully reinbacher turns into a stud. He has the tools to become that. For me anything less than a stud D will hurt lol
Double deflection, screened goals going in are "weak" goals consistently in the gdt, so doing that for a prospect not really associated with the team is easy pickin's.Breakaway goals and deflections don't constitute beer league goals....why indulge in such copium for a meaningless exhibition game? The Habs were the better team but lost the game on goals that would have required heroic stops......it happens.
Have to wonder how much Vincent knows about our prospects, who wouldn't put Beck against the top line?So after watching most of the game again a couple things stood out for me.
Reinbacher was fine very good in fact. I'm still trying to get my head around the strategy of using him so often on the left side in the Dzone. They certainly didn't do that with Mailloux and Hutson.
Did we want to see Engstrom on RD? I hope they switch pairings tomorrow just because.
I paid very close attention to our forwards and there were plenty of issues. Jared Davidson played well but was the lone standout on that line. Xhekaj was terrible on the dot and I didn't like the general lack of offensive creativity from that line. Thorpe scored the one goal but seriously it was all Lane Hutson. I can't recall seeing forwards never mind Dmen pulling off that button hook move after avoiding an off side to keep the play alive 95% would have dumped the puck.
I though Beck's line was good when matched up against Minten but Vincent didn't play the matchup game for most of the evening. I would have liked Heineman to take the puck to the net on those two occasions he opted to shoot. Farrell had the one assist but was not really in sync with his line mates. They did seem to get better towards the end of the game but we need more from him.
I don't have to tell anyone how passive and useless our PK was. It's easy to blame the goaltender but we allowed them far too much uncontested time and space. Wrong players deployed or just a bad concept over all?
Vincent told the kids to play their games, that was the gameplan.Have to wonder how much Vincent knows about our prospects, who wouldn't put Beck against the top line?
He wasn't trying to play a matchup game and it seemed to me Toronto made an effort to get Minten/Cowan against Larose/Savoie.Have to wonder how much Vincent knows about our prospects, who wouldn't put Beck against the top line?
That narrative is weak at best. It all comes down to cap managment. Hughes has shown he is a master at cap management, so far.Be great if you want Toronto success.
That narrative is weak at best. It all comes down to cap managment. Hughes has shown he is a master at cap management, so far.
Fact is that having a team with no superstar isn’t a sustainable model to compete continuously.
Most team that have been continuously competing for the cup in the last 20+ years, have had 2 or 3. The only except that won a cup is st.Louis, and that was clearly a Cinderella run.
That said, you still need to surround correctly the game breaking players. Learning to win is also hard and takes time. We see this in EDM even if they mismanaged the cap with Nurse.
Just imagine EDM with a cap managed like Hughes is managing the Habs cap…
I feel the same, there was clearly something that turned Habs off....I don't think Hughes and Gorton ever doubted his talent, there clearly was something that they knew about that told them that he was not right for the culture of this team.
Even if I think that in the situation the team was when making the pick, that it was a mistake, I do think Reinbacher will be very useful.Fact is Michkov is no superstar but Reinbacher is.
I feel the same, there was clearly something that turned Habs off....
But yea talent is undeniable.
I think the rumor that came out the previous draft year that Montreal wouldn't be taking Russians had some truth to it. Not only did we not take any Russians that year but we traded our only Russian player away at the draft. Last year we were the only team in a while that didn't have a single Russian player in the NHL or AHL.I feel the same, there was clearly something that turned Habs off....
But yea talent is undeniable.
In all seriousness he probably asked him some BS about his dad dying and fighting in the russian armyProbably that creepy psychologist the Habs use told them not to pick Michkov. Maybe he asked him 'if you were a wheelbarrow, would you rather be used to haul horse poop or dog poop' and Michkov said 'dog poop'.
View attachment 907096
The fact that by not picking him (Michkov), the team was going down an unsustainable model to compete continuously; was a huge huge risk. Much bigger risk then the risk of Michkov not coming to the NHL.I don't think Hughes and Gorton ever doubted his talent, there clearly was something that they knew about that told them that he was not right for the culture of this team.