Krams
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2012
- 8,042
- 1,982
Last page of original thread: https://hfboards.mandatory.com/thre...h-officially-official-on-5-23.2494343/page-41
True Blue said:Maybe. But it does seem that a part of commitment, is a commitment to effort
Yeah. Honestly it's been like a dozen games and I think I like him more than torts...and I loved torts.I approve of what he has done here so far.
Bruce banner*
One of the things I'm looking to see is if Quinn can change the zone exits strategy to be a little more dynamic.
Alain ran the same outlet strategy every year he was here, and teams fully adapted by year 3. That stretch pass out of the zone isn't working anymore.
The Rangers have had a lot of trouble exiting the zone cohesively.... some of that is adjustments, some of that is stupidity, but those are the things you look at when a new coach is implementing his ****.
Take Bednar in COL for example.... he's got it down. Terrible during his 1st year... just terrible, yet he's able to adjust, and win with a low talent squad. COL has one of the better support systems when it comes to bailing their defense out when they get control in their own zone.
Torts still runs the same plays as he did in NY. Which, work.... against some teams.
But I like what Bednar is doing the most. He has his forwards alleviate the pressure of the D, and the D come up with multiple passing options.... none of which are the Alain home-run pass. In the last few years, only Michael Grabner benefited from that plan. The Bednar system has it simplified, but also opens up space for a trailer, or a headman. It's one of the reasons why MacKinnon is just crushing it.
Watch them play, keep an eye on the breakouts.... see what they do to free up Mac. It's really high entertainment value hockey. You'll see some filthy plays. Things that you never saw under Alain.
It's tough to get any traction on zone exits when you're D is immobile in a game that is becoming increasingly more mobile. Skjei, Pionk, DeAngelo, and Shattenkirk are the guys that don't handle the puck like a hand grenade, and the latter 3 all have their own issues that run the spectrum. Anyway, you're completely right. It's the next phase I'd like to see some cohesion around, but its just tough when you don't have the horses.
One of the things I'm looking to see is if Quinn can change the zone exits strategy to be a little more dynamic.
Alain ran the same outlet strategy every year he was here, and teams fully adapted by year 3. That stretch pass out of the zone isn't working anymore.
The Rangers have had a lot of trouble exiting the zone cohesively.... some of that is adjustments, some of that is stupidity, but those are the things you look at when a new coach is implementing his ****.
Take Bednar in COL for example.... he's got it down. Terrible during his 1st year... just terrible, yet he's able to adjust, and win with a low talent squad. COL has one of the better support systems when it comes to bailing their defense out when they get control in their own zone.
Torts still runs the same plays as he did in NY. Which, work.... against some teams.
But I like what Bednar is doing the most. He has his forwards alleviate the pressure of the D, and the D come up with multiple passing options.... none of which are the Alain home-run pass. In the last few years, only Michael Grabner benefited from that plan. The Bednar system has it simplified, but also opens up space for a trailer, or a headman. It's one of the reasons why MacKinnon is just crushing it.
Watch them play, keep an eye on the breakouts.... see what they do to free up Mac. It's really high entertainment value hockey. You'll see some filthy plays. Things that you never saw under Alain.
AV would have just chewed his gum harder at Chytil
"Hey kid, you saw what you did over there? You f***ing suck for doing that."He clearly hates Chytil and wants to ruin his game.
"Hey kid, you saw what you did over there? You ****ing suck for doing that."
It's just the eye test of an unsophisticated hockey fan but it looks to me like our breakouts are a lot better. More support coming out of the zone.
Sounds like Torts
For the most part, I really like what Quinn has done. I also think the whole thing with Chytil is overblown. I'll never forget an interview I read with Joe Thornton years back where he talked about his first season in the NHL. He played an average of something like 5-10 mins per game, but said his experience that year jettisoned him onto the path for the player he became. He talked about the attitude of spending the year with professionals, practicing at an NHL level, etc. I would probably prefer Chytil get more minutes, but he has nothing left to prove in the AHL and can learn here as we have no pressure of succeeding this year.
The one thing that concerns me is I'm fearful Quinn is similar to Torts in that he gets the ultimate best from blue collar players but has difficulty handling skill guys. I'm worried Buchnevich is being severely mishandled. For example, in the game yesterday I saw Buchnevich trying to hit, check, start skirmishes on almost every shift. There's a difference between playing hard and playing tough. I'm worried Quinn associates playing hard with playing tough. It's one thing to ask skill players to buy in to a go hard to the net approach, which I think they can benefit from, but if hitting, playing with snarl, etc is what he requires from players like Buch, I don't see them properly developing here or succeeding in the way they could.
F***ing great post RE: Chytil/Jumbo
I have no clue as to what they’re doing with Buch, I hope Quinn or Gorts has a bigger plan than any of us are seeing. Otherwise you’re correct, it looks like f***ery.
The Russian bias of AV has returned?
F***ing great post RE: Chytil/Jumbo
I have no clue as to what they’re doing with Buch, I hope Quinn or Gorts has a bigger plan than any of us are seeing. Otherwise you’re correct, it looks like f***ery.