So he was the wrong hire then.
Because this should have been a development coach. He was sold as being good with kids. That seems untrue at this point.
And that should be rectified immediately.
I posted this elsewhere but:
As a development coach, would rather have someone who wins games with a team full of first round picks, or a coach who maybe makes it to the final 8, but has 5th, 6th, 7th round picks and undrafted players develop for 3-4 years to the point where they make it to the NHL? If we really were going with a development coach from college there are guys who would have made more sense from that point of view.
Leaman (Providence College)
Madigan (Northeastern)Sandelin (Minnesota-Duluth)
Bazin (UMass Lowell)
I think Quinn is a good coach, but not the right fit for a rebuilding team. Put him in charge of the Bruins, Avalanche, Golden Knights and he can tweak those players to get the most out of them. But to build up a team, he just doesn't seem like the right fit. And that's all completely separate from the criticisms I have of Quinn like forgetting players on the bench and complaining about his own decisions.
There's no guarantee that any of the 4 coaches I mentioned would have done better, but if you go for a development coach, at least hire one who actually developed young players. Not a coach who gets Jack Eichel for 6 months, then Brady Tkachuk for 6 months and wins a bunch of games because he has elite talent.
If I am looking for a development coach, my eyes would be focused on guys who turn 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th round picks into NHL-ers, not the guy who has a team full of the best recruits each year.