This team does not play playoff hockey.
Thats a management issue.
GM needs to get more balance on the roster.
Coach needs to do a much better job .... you know coaching.
Haven't had a competent 4th line since JG took over..
This team does not play playoff hockey.
Thats a management issue.
GM needs to get more balance on the roster.
Coach needs to do a much better job .... you know coaching.
But to me those are things that are instilled into players by good coaching. One thing Sullivan, Tortorella, Trotz, etc. all have in common is they preach good structure and like you mentioned, support from the fowards... playing as an entire unit. Its no surprise the Rangers churned out lots of good 2way players under Tortorella. When people talk about developing players and prospects those are the types of things in play. You can coach players into having a complete gameToo much focus is put on DQ, Gorton and Drury plays a very big part in this too.
We have no balance on the roster. No if’s or buts about it. It’s basic hockey. Who on each line regularly drops down to support the Ds and makes sure on a shift by shift basis that we don’t lose too many players up high?
We are comically short in that department. Our top guys at it are like Panarin, Ziba and Buch.
It’s not easy and you must play the hand you are dealt — but it’s in relation to these stuff a GM that knows what he is doing makes a rough decision that has everyone else wondering a bit at first but that makes sure that the team isn’t fundamentally flawed. Our team is like building a Formula 1 car but only buying 3 wheels.
We had one opening in the top 9, we chose a high forechecker in Gauthier. Ops we only have 3 wheels, but let’s improve the clutch first...
I usually agree with most of your takes but this one is just horrifically bad and is clear evidence of armchair coaching/GM'ing without HaViNG pLaYeD tHE gAME.
By the time you reach the NHL you're not going to get better at faceoffs by practicing more. It's a skill you have or you don't. It's like saying, "hey Jack Johnson go jump rope 1,000x before practice every day to get faster". It's just not going to happen.
Nail on the head stuff right hereThe responsibilities of a coach to me are: a) to instill a cohesive strategic and tactical structure and sound fundamentals suited to the current roster, b) to promote a unifying culture centered on collaborative accountability, c) to instill good habits in young players and perpetuate the good habits of veterans, and d) to work with management to identify potential acquisitions and divestitures that ensure the preceding.
Have I missed anything? Anyway, I don’t see Quinn & Co doing a particularly good job of any of the above.
I agree and disagree with this.
Agree that taking a billion practice face off reps won't do much of anything. Completely disagree what you can't get better though.
These days, face offs are all about using leverage (which is honed through some level of repetition) and knowing how to cheat "legally." It's how Crosby went from awful to awesome.
If Zibs and Chytil practiced against each other every practice.... Refining technique, coordination and movements... they would get better.
Do they have that coaching help in that area? I dont know.
Lol no one is talking about set plays.
The convo was about whether or not practicing faces offs makes you better at faceoffs. OP said they don't really make a difference, I agree with him.
Learn to read before popping off you dummy![]()
There are plenty of examples of guys who have gotten better at faceoffs.I usually agree with most of your takes but this one is just horrifically bad and is clear evidence of armchair coaching/GM'ing without HaViNG pLaYeD tHE gAME.
By the time you reach the NHL you're not going to get better at faceoffs by practicing more. It's a skill you have or you don't. It's like saying, "hey Jack Johnson go jump rope 1,000x before practice every day to get faster". It's just not going to happen.
I think the key to winning is having a good roster but I'm the one overcomplicating things.Bruh.. He was a big part of the solution and reached the ultimate goal.
Ahh.. I'm gonna respectfully bow out here.
You know the rest.. It's just a matter of time until you're ready to admit it.
Ultimately..We see the game in the same light and have the same goal in mind only you like to complicate things 1000x more than they need to be..
I think the key to winning is having a good roster but I'm the one overcomplicating things.
I think the key to winning is having a good roster but I'm the one overcomplicating things.
I tried to be exhaustive in my description.Nail on the head stuff right here
Do they have that coaching help in that area?If 2 centers are bad at face off by league standards, would going up against each other really help them improve? Or will they just stay at the same level?
You were. It all boils down to his job as a coach is to have these guys playing the right way. And he sure as shit doesn't. Whether it's through motivation, systems, in game strategy - any and all of it - he doesn't have it.I tried to be exhaustive in my description.![]()
Do they have that coaching help in that area?
If I'm training BJJ, I have my instructor and practice against him or against someone else while he watches and coaches us both.
Once again, back to coaching, instructing etc.
At least Torts motivated and instilled good fundamentals. He did not try to be popular or promote pretty hockey. He’s a disciplinarian but defended his players to the end of the world — almost like a stern father. We had a good roster for that style, and instead of tweaking our roster to ensure his style continued to work, we axed him. I supported that at the time, and I’ll admit it was a mistake, but that was my taking our success for granted snd instead focusing on the aesthetic of our game. His departure did allow some players to flourish — CK comes to mind. On the other hand, it led to the AV era, which was the beginning of the end of our end. The flexibility he afforded players might have been refreshing for veterans but was anathema to the development of our players at a critical moment in their careers. Now we pay the price.You were. It all boils down to his job as a coach is to have these guys playing the right way. And he sure as shit doesn't. Whether it's through motivation, systems, in game strategy - any and all of it - he doesn't have it.
If 2 centers are bad at face off by league standards, would going up against each other really help them improve? Or will they just stay at the same level?
Question is.. How do you not improve by practicing?
Add to that..In a competitive setting?
By that logic..You're gonna get worse?
Makes no sense..
no whereOk question to the Pro Quinn crowd:
Even with the veterans struggling, how do you explain teams like Detroit and Chicago looking better than we do? Their records aren't all the more better, but they look faster and more cohesive than the Rangers have.
Even when Rangers look better than their opponents, they've looked pretty listless. There's a serious lack of any positive emotion in their game, it's almost as if they're treating these games as pre season.
Where do you train at?
I usually agree with most of your takes but this one is just horrifically bad and is clear evidence of armchair coaching/GM'ing without HaViNG pLaYeD tHE gAME.
By the time you reach the NHL you're not going to get better at faceoffs by practicing more. It's a skill you have or you don't. It's like saying, "hey Jack Johnson go jump rope 1,000x before practice every day to get faster". It's just not going to happen.