- Jan 18, 2012
- 35,251
- 53,895
Must be the same in-house metrics that prove how tremendous Jack Johnson is at hockey activitiesSomeone asked DQ in the postgame conference why they suck at faceoffs and DQ said he doesn't pay attention to "your stats". Apparently under the Rangers in-house metrics they're actually really good at faceoffs and not the worst team in the league at them.
God this comment hurts to read. I think you’re right on the money.Must be the same in-house metrics that prove how tremendous Jack Johnson is at hockey activities
"Why are you guys so bad at faceoffs this year?"
DQ: "We are not bad at faceoffs, you are blind from watching stats, we are doing good on faceoffs."
It's Quinn's fault that Panarin and Zibanejad are playing worse than last year? Was it to his credit that they played well last year? That's on the player. Not the coach.
The major issue is a bunch of us in here have been saying Quinn is a terrible coach for years now( go back and find last years mid season grade thread for evidence of just how little credibility the Quinn support bunch has.) The issue though is this current roster, whatever progress they may be making, is despite Quinn— not because of him. NHL players don’t respond like college guys because college guys have a loyalty to the university that extends beyond playing hockey. That allows Quinn’s message of accountability to ring true( ie if I want to play these next 4 years I better do what this guy wants.) Players in the NHL need structure, consistency and to be put in positions to succeed. Can anyone realistically say Quinn does any of that well? Aside from the fact that I can’t even tell anymore what he attempts to hold the players accountable for...
Bottom line is, I’m certain the front office and JD in particular are well aware of the better coaching options out there. I don’t think this will last much longer and could see a change by the 20 game mark if this team does not look noticeably better.
we have nothing to lose by getting rid of the David Quinn experiment. With shortened season we are way out of the playoffs and even if we miraculously make the playoffs I am not interested in another sweep.
There are some top quality coaches available. There is no reason why we should not pull the plug now. The longer they attempt to put a square peg in a round hole the worse it will look for everybody.
It is a no brainer for any team last in the standings to replace the coaching staff. This season they have to also weigh the poor tv ratings vs money lost due to firing of the coaches.
Our only win came when our goalie was crazy good and the other team did not take us too seriously after beating us 4-0.
Beat me to it.Not a DQ defender but attacking his faceoff quote is silly. He stated the team was abysmal at faceoffs tonight. His point, which you all are missing, was also that it's not entirely on the center to win the faceoff. If a Rangers' center pulls the draw back slightly but the other team's winger jumps in and takes the puck, that's counted as a faceoff win for the other team.
What do you want him to say? Call out specific players and say they suck at faceoffs? It's not like you can coach an NHL centerman to take better faceoffs, it's a skill that players either have or they don't. Nobody is going to dramatically improve their faceoff win % by taking more faceoffs at practice by the time they get to the NHL.
"Why are you guys so bad at faceoffs this year?"
DQ: "We are not bad at faceoffs, you are blind from watching stats, we are doing good on faceoffs."
Sorokin was also awful in that game. The score was not indicative of the game itself. Game 1 NYR was awful and never really in the game, game 2 NYI was in it for spurts but bad goals just crippled them.And lost their starting goalie in warmup
Is this an actual quote? If so this is the demeanor of a coach who is about to get fired."Why are you guys so bad at faceoffs this year?"
DQ: "We are not bad at faceoffs, you are blind from watching stats, we are doing good on faceoffs."