BruinDust
Registered User
- Aug 2, 2005
- 25,129
- 23,761
The very fact they (the Bruins) are even considering a 5-year deal is troubling.
Does anyone have any faith that a 26-year old UFA Pastrnak won't bolt for greener pastures?
I would of hoped at least by now the Bruins and Barry could of at least found common ground on the term.
Barry wants 8, and if they are smart so should the Bruins. There is zero, zero, zero reason to hand out a 8-year deal to Brad Marchand to play until he's 37, but to balk at a 8-year term to keep Pastrnak until he's 29. That's some real &^%%$ backwards thinking on the part of Bruins management if that is the case.
Does anyone have any faith that a 26-year old UFA Pastrnak won't bolt for greener pastures?
I would of hoped at least by now the Bruins and Barry could of at least found common ground on the term.
Barry wants 8, and if they are smart so should the Bruins. There is zero, zero, zero reason to hand out a 8-year deal to Brad Marchand to play until he's 37, but to balk at a 8-year term to keep Pastrnak until he's 29. That's some real &^%%$ backwards thinking on the part of Bruins management if that is the case.