LeBrun: Dallas and Minnesota interested in Brock Nelson

ctmagic

Registered User
Jan 15, 2013
397
319
Would be nice to have a guy like Nelson on the roster to help carry the load until Ek is back to 100%. Nelson, Ek, Rossi down the middle sounds like a deep playoff run to me. Nelson can play wing too and would give the wild a lot of flexibility. I know our GM hasn’t traded valuable assets for a ‘rental’ but I wonder if this seasons hot start and the potential to resign Nelson past this year is enough motivation for Bill to go all in.
 

JiricekSaveUs

Danila Yurov Fan Club Executive Assistant
May 2, 2018
19,307
12,251
Idk how the Wild realistically get Nelson. They would have to deal their first in 2027 since 2026 is still possible for the Jackets via the Jiricek trade.

I wouldn’t do Ohgren. Maybe Heidt/Stramel +
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,492
11,466
Idk how the Wild realistically get Nelson. They would have to deal their first in 2027 since 2026 is still possible for the Jackets via the Jiricek trade.

I wouldn’t do Ohgren. Maybe Heidt/Stramel +
Minny sent their 25 first right? Are any of the 26 picks upgradeable to a 1st?
 

icelander25

Registered User
Oct 22, 2024
43
26
Idk how the Wild realistically get Nelson. They would have to deal their first in 2027 since 2026 is still possible for the Jackets via the Jiricek trade.

I wouldn’t do Ohgren. Maybe Heidt/Stramel +
Personally not a fan of Heidt or Stramel, and if that 2026 1st isn't available either, then Ohgren has to be included or else a deal just isn't happening straight up. Other teams wouldn't give that quality of prospect up but they'd at least have a first + a regular prospect which will easily outbid Heidt + 2nd or whatever
 

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,612
6,189
Personally not a fan of Heidt or Stramel, and if that 2026 1st isn't available either, then Ohgren has to be included or else a deal just isn't happening straight up. Other teams wouldn't give that quality of prospect up but they'd at least have a first + a regular prospect which will easily outbid Heidt + 2nd or whatever
Realistically the 2026 1st wouldn’t even be beneficial unless you want something that will be a 4-5 year project down the line. Outside of it being a 2025 1st (and not one of the last 3-5 of the round), the prospect would have to be something of substantial quality that can help the team in the next year or two (at the latest).
 

thestonedkoala

Going Dark
Aug 27, 2004
28,709
1,733
Personally not a fan of Heidt or Stramel, and if that 2026 1st isn't available either, then Ohgren has to be included or else a deal just isn't happening straight up. Other teams wouldn't give that quality of prospect up but they'd at least have a first + a regular prospect which will easily outbid Heidt + 2nd or whatever
Why isn't Heidt a 'regular' prospect and what is a regular prospect?
 

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,918
19,164
Realistically the 2026 1st wouldn’t even be beneficial unless you want something that will be a 4-5 year project down the line. Outside of it being a 2025 1st (and not one of the last 3-5 of the round), the prospect would have to be something of substantial quality that can help the team in the next year or two (at the latest).
So if he goes to a team with a late 2025 1st, that late 2025 1st + run of the mill prospect is fine, but because Minnesota doesn't have a late 2025 1st, we need to offer a prospect of substantial quality - better than anything anyone else is offering - to get a deal done?

That's not how this works. Nelson isn't suddenly worth Ohgren just because we don't have the 1st. If that disqualifies us so be it, but in no world does it mean Ohgren is suddenly a fair return.
 

Digitalbooya

By order of the Peaky Blinders
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2010
28,392
8,147
Wisconsin
Personally not a fan of Heidt or Stramel, and if that 2026 1st isn't available either, then Ohgren has to be included or else a deal just isn't happening straight up. Other teams wouldn't give that quality of prospect up but they'd at least have a first + a regular prospect which will easily outbid Heidt + 2nd or whatever
Personally not a fan of sending anything of value for a guy that has a strong chance of signing in Minnesota in the offseason anyways. Trading Ohgren or a 1st for him would be a dumb shortsighted move.
 

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,612
6,189
So if he goes to a team with a late 2025 1st, that late 2025 1st + run of the mill prospect is fine, but because Minnesota doesn't have a late 2025 1st, we need to offer a prospect of substantial quality - better than anything anyone else is offering - to get a deal done?

That's not how this works. Nelson isn't suddenly worth Ohgren just because we don't have the 1st. If that disqualifies us so be it, but in no world does it mean Ohgren is suddenly a fair return.
It’s more like there’s no reason to just take some mediocre prospect who might top out as a bottom 6 forward and a 1st in 3 seasons from now (or a mid round pick from 2025) just to get an asset for Brock Nelson.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Real JT

AKL

Danila Yurov Fan Club President
Sponsor
Dec 10, 2012
40,918
19,164
It’s more like there’s no reason to just take some mediocre prospect who might top out as a bottom 6 forward and a 1st in 3 seasons from now (or a mid round pick from 2025) just to get an asset for Brock Nelson.

Well there's a reason to take the best offer you can get, which may or may not be Minnesota's offer.

Simple fact is he's going to get traded, and the return is likely going to be a 1st+prospect, and neither of those pieces are likely going to be as highly valued as Ohgren.

There's no reason to include Ohgren in this deal at all.
 

miscs75

Registered User
Jul 2, 2014
6,612
6,189
Well there's a reason to take the best offer you can get, which may or may not be Minnesota's offer.

Simple fact is he's going to get traded, and the return is likely going to be a 1st+prospect, and neither of those pieces are likely going to be as highly valued as Ohgren.

There's no reason to include Ohgren in this deal at all.
Who’s to say they won’t be? Teams usually overpay for high priced rentals in order to load up for the playoffs. Also knowing how Lou is, if the Isles are remotely close to the playoffs he won’t sell off assets in hopes of stocking up on picks/prospects for the future.
 

The Real JT

The crowd called out for more
Jul 2, 2018
8,363
7,975
Connecticut
Simple fact is he's going to get traded, and the return is likely going to be a 1st+prospect, and neither of those pieces are likely going to be as highly valued as Ohgren.

There's no reason to include Ohgren in this deal at all.
Simple fact is none of us know what is going to happen. That includes you and me.

The Isles are at best a bubble team and with the return of Barzal and Pelech to the lineup they could still make a run at a playoff spot. Throw in Sorokin standing on his head as he often does and maybe Nelson doesn’t get moved.

Assuming Lou remains at the helm, he could easily resign him for 3-4 more years. Not saying I agree with it but Lou does Lou.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad