Are there any good articles that summarize what happened with Glendale/Gila River Arena? I know that it was an unhappy marriage for a long time, but I just can't figure out how they ended up with a pro sports arena with no tenant and a pro sports team without a home. The Yotes didn't operate that arena, right? They were just tenants that paid for their 41 dates and that was it?
Meh.... see a new thread and then discover it's just going to be yet another collection of reruns I've watched before.
(And no boys and girls.... I'm not going away.... I've been busy with this thing called real life and there's really been nothing new to talk about.)
Want to make it 149?You know how many threads I’ve seen wondering if this is the end?
At least 148.
Quebecor has been really quiet through all this. You could say almost "True North" quiet. They could host the team this fall without an issue. I think expansion is being lined up for SLC and Atlanta, leaving another western city. 9 teams per division......the final goal being 10.
If Bettman was talking to politicians in Phoenix, why would he go on Canadian TV to do it? He'd likely get better traction talking to a reporter in Phoenix.My previous comment about Bettman talking to the politicians through the media is mostly directed to PHX. Out of everything that is an option locally at this point the method that seems to be the messiest but in the long term best is for the team to be sold to the sun's owner on the premise that a new building is built or another intense round of renovations takes place to bring it up to snuff for hockey but further enhance is for all events. Ishba can sit there and say he isn't interested or is lukewarm but if the league can get him more massive improvements to his facility or help him in other ways financially through negotiations with the local government then perhaps his interest in the team increases and there can finally be some stability.
Maybe because Bettman on Canadian TV gets wide, national coverage while Bettman talking to someone in Phoenix ... not so much.If Bettman was talking to politicians in Phoenix, why would he go on Canadian TV to do it? He'd likely get better traction talking to a reporter in Phoenix.
Why would politicians in Phoenix watch Canadian TV? If the your goal is talk to a very specific group of people, you don't need to worry about it reaching a wide audience.Maybe because Bettman on Canadian TV gets wide, national coverage while Bettman talking to someone in Phoenix ... not so much.
Here's the story Tucker....
Glendale built the arena for the Coyotes.
However, ownership experiences financial difficulties because of the 06-09 recession, and, sparing you the details, the team was place into bankruptcy.
The BK judge ruled that the bankruptcy voided the lease.
In order to prevent rogue ownership from purchasing the team out of BK, the league itself purchased the team out of BK.
AND......that's when the issues with Glendale really started.
Supposedly the NHL was also managing the arena, but they didn't work very hard at it.
The league also asked twice for 25M/yr for management and to cover team losses while new owners were sought. This was a bit of extortion in a way, because there were subtle threats about relocating the team back to Winnipeg (The Thrashers were still in Atlanta). Glendale paid the 25M twice.
Finally, the team was sold to a group called Ice Arizona. However, they required 15M/yr to manage the arena, and so the city was actually losing about 10M/yr on the arena after all the numbers were finished being run.
There were some communication issues between Glendale and IA, and there was also a mistake in that IA hired a city lawyer onto their staff. That's a no-no under Arizona law, and it gave the city the legal right to void the lease.
Thereafter, a 2year arrangement was placed, which were much better terms for the city.
And.....it became clear that there wasn't enough money available while playing in Glendale to make both the team and the city happy, so a divorce became inevitable.
And, after several changes of ownership, Meruelo bought the team, and terms for a continuing lease at GRA could not be found (not enough money available for both parties).
That's how it happened.
you're right, no one south of the border would pay any attention to those comments, they are only regionally relevant and the internet/ national media dont exist. my mistake...If Bettman was talking to politicians in Phoenix, why would he go on Canadian TV to do it? He'd likely get better traction talking to a reporter in Phoenix.
Here's the story Tucker....
Glendale built the arena for the Coyotes.
However, ownership experiences financial difficulties because of the 06-09 recession, and, sparing you the details, the team was place into bankruptcy.
The BK judge ruled that the bankruptcy voided the lease.
In order to prevent rogue ownership from purchasing the team out of BK, the league itself purchased the team out of BK.
AND......that's when the issues with Glendale really started.
Supposedly the NHL was also managing the arena, but they didn't work very hard at it.
The league also asked twice for 25M/yr for management and to cover team losses while new owners were sought. This was a bit of extortion in a way, because there were subtle threats about relocating the team back to Winnipeg (The Thrashers were still in Atlanta). Glendale paid the 25M twice.
Finally, the team was sold to a group called Ice Arizona. However, they required 15M/yr to manage the arena, and so the city was actually losing about 10M/yr on the arena after all the numbers were finished being run.
There were some communication issues between Glendale and IA, and there was also a mistake in that IA hired a city lawyer onto their staff. That's a no-no under Arizona law, and it gave the city the legal right to void the lease.
Thereafter, a 2year arrangement was placed, which were much better terms for the city.
And.....it became clear that there wasn't enough money available while playing in Glendale to make both the team and the city happy, so a divorce became inevitable.
And, after several changes of ownership, Meruelo bought the team, and terms for a continuing lease at GRA could not be found (not enough money available for both parties).
That's how it happened.
Prime Friday/Sat/Sunday nights for home games would be a loss of cash for the arena compared to having multiple different events and selling more tickets along with less cost.So it sounds like management of the arena by the team is a ship that has long sailed and the team is unable to put enough butts in the seats to make a simple 41 date lease work (which I think would be difficult for many teams).
Seems like the arena is doing pretty well without them now (Desert Diamond Arena sees new profitability high). Would’ve loved to have been a fly on the wall during the last round of negotiations just to see what each side wanted to make it profitable. I’m guessing it would’ve taken an attendance figure they haven’t seen possibly ever.
I feel as if the NHL and Mureulo have under estimated the opposition to tax incentives/breaks/free land in the area.
Can't say I've seen any other muncipialties in Arizona try to create a community facilities district expressly for a private property area. Could be wrong though.Other developments that get similar incentives don't see the same kinds of opposition. Nothing about TED was really out of the ordinary.