Tom13Falcons
Registered User
- Aug 16, 2013
- 128
- 0
Your opinions and thoughts about the back up goalie for your CBJ during the 2013 to 14 season.
One of the biggest questions going into the season IMO. I don't see him getting many starts.
Are you in Springy/Mass.? Are you a fan of the Falcons? Did you see him play last year? If so, I'd be as interested in your take/scouting report as any of our speculation.
Don't like the situation at all.
Bob may have won a Vezina, but it was for a season that was only 48 games long. Can he log 60+ games and play at an elite level? We don't know yet, but having McElhinney as insurance doesn't sound like a good idea. He should be backing up goalies like Lundqvist and Rinne, not Bob.
Bobrovsky in 2012-2013:
KHL - 24 GP, 1.94 GAA, .932 SV%
NHL - 38 GP, 2.00 GAA, .932 SV%
He played in 62 games last year and was great. I think he can play in 64-70 games just fine.
60+ games in the NHL seems like it would be a bit more taxing but your point is taken.
Are you in Springy/Mass.? Are you a fan of the Falcons? Did you see him play last year? If so, I'd be as interested in your take/scouting report as any of our speculation.
Another reason for concern:
Bob was a relative unknown in the Western Conference. Most of his games were against Eastern Conference teams when he was in Philly. Now we're going to a division with his former team and other teams who are much more familiar with him. It's possible that after this season and with the knowledge they have, the book may be out on Bob.
The question is if he can make that "book" irrelevant by quickly identifying and then eliminating weaknesses. That's his major difference from Mason in my opinion. Bob isn't perfect, but he knows that and will work night and day to improve himself even when he's on top. The key may be "high glove," but after a few games Bobrovsky will understand that and work himself (and Ian Clark) into the ground trying to fix it.
As for McElhinney, his track record shows he isn't (usually) an NHL caliber goalie. So that worries me. But I can say that he *deserves* a shot and *earned* it last season working his butt off in Springfield and being great. Then again, we know a few other players *cough* Prospal *cough* who earned another NHL contract last year and hasn't gotten it.
I think the change in Bobrovsky wasn't so much him changing conferences(though I do believe that played a factor) as much as it was him buckling down on his positioning. I remember there was a lot of talk of him tweaking his techniques and positioning after working with Ian Clark and obviously it paid off big time.
Unlike the other guy I am in Springfield, am a fan of the Falcons and saw him play many times last year. He started off unbelievable and then tailed off ever so slightly towards the end of the year. If he has to make 25 starts for you guys I think you'll be just fine.
Are you in Springy/Mass.? Are you a fan of the Falcons? Did you see him play last year? If so, I'd be as interested in your take/scouting report as any of our speculation.
Durring the lockout McElhinney had Prout, Erixon, Moore, Savard, and Goloubef for his 5 out of 6 defenseman. He should lay well since has some familiar players. McElhinney is the real deal if he has quality defenseman with him. After all they would have saved some of hormone money reserved for a back up goalie.
Tell me more about this hormone money.
I had an autocorrect off of my iPad
The last and only two times I saw him in the NHL he was playing for the ducks and to say he played poorly would be putting it politely.
I hate the idea of him as a backup, quite honestly. I believe you need a backup who can push the starter. I don't care how good Bob is, you need a guy that is at least capable of playing at a similar level, even in small chunks. I don't see McElhinney doing that. I hope I'm wrong.