Crosby vs Iginla: Better Goal Scorer

What do you think?


  • Total voters
    80

slapKing

Registered User
Feb 12, 2020
738
845
Canada
Since Crosby got 600 goals not too long ago, a comparison between him and Iginla could be interesting.

Crosby:
- 600 goals in 1295 games
- 2 Rocket Richards
- 1x 50 goal season, 3x 40 goal seasons, 12x 30 goal seasons
- goal finishes of 1st, 1st, 7th, 7th

Iginla:
- 625 goals in 1554 games
- 2 Rocket Richards
- 2x 50 goal season, 4x 40 goal seasons, 12x 30 goal seasons
- goal finishes of 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd
 

Barsky

Registered User
Jun 22, 2010
340
193
Iginla has better pure shooting skills but Crosby is the better overall goal scorer. I think the numbers make that pretty clear.
Perhaps, but gotta factor in the fact Iggy never really had a good centre to play with at any point in his entire career. My apologies to Craig Conroy
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bounces R Way

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,660
16,625
Vancouver
I think they’re pretty similar in terms of goal scoring ability. Crosby had the better goal scoring career because he has much better longevity as a top player. Best 7-8 years are arguably a slight edge to Iginla. Both led the league twice, and Iginla has two other 3rd place finishes and Crosby has two 7th place finishes. Those are their only top 10 finishes, though Crosby would have finished high in 10-11.
 

Incognito

Registered User
Oct 18, 2008
6,536
3,218
Toronto, Ontario
Crosby is a 700+ goal scorer without injuries. He gets underrated in this department because he doesn’t have an elite shot and he’s thought of as a pass-first player, but he’s quietly been one of the better goal scorers in the league over the past 20 years.
 

nowhereman

Registered User
Jan 24, 2010
9,477
8,116
Los Angeles
I think this is advantage Crosby. He has 25 less goals in 259 less games. And those injuries robbed us of what could have been one of the better goalscoring seasons of the modern era in in 10-11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: authentic

Video Nasty

Registered User
Mar 12, 2017
5,762
10,016
I think this is advantage Crosby. He has 25 less goals in 259 less games. And those injuries robbed us of what could have been one of the better goalscoring seasons of the modern era in in 10-11.

Yeah, but Iginla played almost all of his career during both Dead Puck Eras, so according to Crosby fanboy math, Iginla actually has 200 more goals than he does in reality.

Just kidding, I agree. This is Crosby.
 

SirKillalot

Registered User
Feb 27, 2008
6,132
486
Norway
None?

They only finished top 5 in the Western conference regular season once during his prime. They had the miracle run in 2004 (which is more a Kiprusoff thing), but outside that they were never contenders.
Exactly, so I'd say as a pure goalscorer its Iginla. Just never were in a particularly good team in his prime.
 

Hockey Outsider

Registered User
Jan 16, 2005
9,515
15,882
Both players have "thin" goal-scoring resumes. Each has two Rocket Richard trophies, but only two other years in the top ten. Most players who have led the league multiple times have many more years near the top.

Looking a bit deeper - Iginla placed in the top twenty in goals 13 times(*). 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd, 11th, 14th, 16th, 16th, 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th, 19th.

Crosby placed in the top twenty in goals 11 times. 1st, 1st, 7th, 7th, 11th, 12th, 13th, 14th, 16th, 19th, 20th.

The argument for Iginla is he was more consistently near the top (ie more years in the top three, top five, and top twenty), and he had a weaker supporting cast. The argument for Crosby is he's a fair bit more productive per game. The scoring environment is essentially a wash here. I would rank Crosby ahead in the playoffs (Iginla scored a bit more per game but Crosby maintained that average on significantly more and deeper playoff runs).

(*) All numbers are pulled from my database. I think I've accounted for ties correctly, but let me know if anything looks off.
 
Last edited:

gritdash60

Registered User
Aug 9, 2022
1,519
1,554
Behind the net
Voted Iggy, Crosby probably could've been if Ryan Whitney betted against him after the 50 one, he just thinks team first and "left goals on the table" so to speak because he cares about winning not about goals.
 

daver

Registered User
Apr 4, 2003
26,576
6,286
Visit site
During their careers:

Crosby - #2 in goals (OV), #3 in GPG among Top 20 (OV, Stamkos)

Iggy - #1 in goals, #T8 in GPG among Top 20
 

Ignatius

Utah Direwolf
Apr 28, 2010
2,587
1,656
Sin Bin
Check Crosby's stats from the 2017 Cup run, especially in the Washington series. Sid's shooting percentage was through the roof and was absolute money in terms of being counted on for scoring goals that run.

Iggy was great especially before the 2005 lockout but Sid wins this no doubt.
 

Regal

Registered User
Mar 12, 2010
26,660
16,625
Vancouver
During their careers:

Crosby - #2 in goals (OV), #3 in GPG among Top 20 (OV, Stamkos)

Iggy - #1 in goals, #T8 in GPG among Top 20

Career numbers for goals doesn’t really feel like a good measure. Slow starts and slow finishes that aren’t reflective of the player.

Iginla’s top 10 seasons (01-02 to 11-12) he was 1st in goals and 3rd in GPG among the top 20 (behind Ovechkin and Kovalchuk)

Crosby’s top 10 seasons (09-10 to 18-19) he was 4th in goals and 3rd in GPG among the top 20 (behind Ovechkin and Stamkos).

They’re very similar level goalscorers, who also have similar goals finishes, with an edge to Iginla. The difference is mainly that Crosby’s been an elite player for longer. Does that make him a better goal scorer? I don’t think so. But I guess he should be ahead in terms of “greatness” due to it
 

Hippasus

1,9,45,165,495,1287,
Feb 17, 2008
5,967
505
Bridgeview
It seems to me that Iginla played more of his prime through lean dead-puck seasons than Crosby. As such, I would think goal-scoring finishes thin-out more near the top. Then, when one takes into account Iginla's lesser supporting cast, particularly offensively, I believe the answer has to be Iginla.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad