Crosby and Kyle Connor fight after reverse hit

Jacob

as seen on TV
Feb 27, 2002
50,290
27,023
Should the reverse hit be a penalty in this situation? Crosby never had possession, I think Connor should get an interference penalty on this one.
Nah. I think if you go high with shoulder or elbow maybe call something but Connor just stuck his butt out. Crosby should’ve thanked him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Filthy Dangles

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,707
144,271
Bojangles Parking Lot
Should the reverse hit be a penalty in this situation? Crosby never had possession, I think Connor should get an interference penalty on this one.

IMO yes, this is so far from the puck that it doesn’t constitute any sort of attempt at self-defense or creating space to make a play. Connor just throws his hip into Crosby’s skating lane, that’s interference.
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,431
25,013
Evanston, IL
Should the reverse hit be a penalty in this situation? Crosby never had possession, I think Connor should get an interference penalty on this one.
Borderline case. If this is deemed a "battle for the puck" or if Connor is deemed to not have moved laterally to make contact with Crosby, it's not an interference penalty. Connor doesn't really change his path there, he just slows down. He also doesn't take an unnatural path toward the puck to set a pick.
 

FunkySeeFunkyDo

Registered User
Aug 3, 2014
4,776
4,322
Because of the blatant interference for no reason affecting a player who has no expectation of being targeted for physical contact in that context and is thus more vulnerable?
“no reason”—The reason was to get and maintain possession of the puck
“no expectation…”—Perhaps he should have.
“interference”—Would love a rules expert to explain if and or when a reverse hit is a penalty.
 

Romang67

BitterSwede
Jan 2, 2011
31,431
25,013
Evanston, IL
“no reason”—The reason was to get and maintain possession of the puck
“no expectation…”—Perhaps he should have.
“interference”—Would love a rules expert to explain if and or when a reverse hit is a penalty.
As I indicated above, a reverse hit is basically contingent on the hitter moving in the same direction as the hittee, and then using this clause:

A player is allowed the ice he is standing on
(body position) and is not required to move in order
to let an opponent proceed.
A reverse hit is really just a particularly sturdy body position.

A hitter can't not be skating in between another player and the puck and then stop. That's not the ice he's standing on.

He also can't move laterally from the path he's on to block another player (or lay a reverse hit for that matter), because he would abandoned the ice he's on:

A player delivering a “pick” is one who moves into an
opponent’s path without initially having body position,

He can, however, slow down to force a player to skate around him:

A player is always entitled to use his body position to
lengthen an opponent’s path to the puck, provided
his stick is not utilized (to make himself “bigger” and
therefore considerably lengthening the distance his
opponent must travel to get where he is going); his
free hand is not used and he does not take
advantage of his body position to deliver an
otherwise illegal check.

Again, I think this is a borderline case. I don't think it's an egregious non-call.
 

Turin

Erik Karlsson is good
Feb 27, 2018
24,067
28,533
Crosby trying to spark the team but it’s just embarrassing because it’s Kyle Connor, the softest winger in the show.

This whole team is just embarrassingly pathetic for no reason now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nikolajs Sillers

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad