Yet people bitch about the lack of development or Nicholas hiring. Credit to the current players though on not sitting on their laurels and never being satisfied
People want to believe they're smarter than others. You see it in every aspect of life from politics to sports to relationships. It's hard to trust that others are doing their job properly once you've seen how incompetent people are in real life, so they naturally assume everyone else is dumb. But they fail to realize that people can have different competencies and them being good as a welder or something like that doesn't mean they understand medicine or other such things. So you've got all these people who want to believe them being the best burger flipper means they could run hockey team ops.
The truth is we don't work for the Habs or see day-to-day operations so we don't actually know who's competent and who's the version of Brad the lazy and useless motherf***er from our day-to-day lives. So we guess who is good or bad at their job based on historically true things; and the truth in hockey is that it is 90% of the time the coach's or GM's fault because they're the public face of the organization.
So there becomes the sentiment that everything bad is the coach's fault and everything good is from the players or some undersung hero. We all parroted how Timmins deserved a bigger role in the organization because he drafted McDonagh, Subban and Patches and didn't want to trade McDonagh when the org did. We saw one instance of him being right, and thought he was the only good part of a rotten organization.
Except he was just like us, he took credit for the good shit at his work and blamed the failings on his employers. Oh I didn't want Leblanc, he wanted Kreider. I wanted John Carlson when we traded the first for Tanguay. Yeah I would have taken Debrincat and Girard. Oh I wanted Giroux but I was overruled. It's easy to say that shit in hindsight but the reality was he wanted to trade up to take Lernout over the 15 or so good NHLers that came out of the 2013 third round. And he made a lot of those sorts of mistakes. Just he only mentioned the good things he would have done when the dust is settled. When the American player was the best, he wanted American players and that was his reputation. But when the American player was worse, he wanted the Quebec player. Except the reality is he drafted the weaker player in multiple instances and had excuses for why. McDonagh panned out. Patches over Perron was debatable but I don't think Perron was ever close to Patches at driving a line. Yet he also did Fischer over Giroux and Leblanc over Kreider.
So we shouldn't being throwing grains of salt at people, but alas, we are hockey fans. And predominantly men. And that is what we are good at, bitching and complaining and backseat driving. But we won't admit it, we will just say those are womanly traits, even though they probably get more shit done than us.
But anyways, when we are winning, Marty good, when we are losing, Marty bad. No room for nuance. I will optimistically say I have not seen youth in our organization develop this well since I started following the Habs, outside of outliers like Subban, Patches, Price Gally, Markov, Saku. Not in my lifetime of watching (not old enough for 70s sorry) have we had a concentrated movement that all matured and developed at the same time the way we're seeing now.
And I'm sure Brad the lazy motherf***er is competent at something too, just not at working or being not a lazy motherf***er.