Value of: Chris Kreider

Savant

Registered User
Oct 3, 2013
38,411
11,509
So why specially Kreider are the rangers wanting gone?

I swear to god ranger fans are mostly wanting Zibenijad catapulted into the sun.
The Rangers need cap space, and have worse players that make more money that are harder to move. If the Rangers move Kreider it’s not going to be a “hockey trade” it’s going to be for some combination of picks/prospects/ELC.

Rangers are going to move better players on more tradable contracts than worse players on anchors
 

seabass45

Registered User
Jan 12, 2007
8,298
1,590
So why specially Kreider are the rangers wanting gone?

I swear to god ranger fans are mostly wanting Zibenijad catapulted into the sun.
Kreider is one of two Rangers vets with limited trade protection that could realistically be traded. Salary is reasonable, good possibility for a hockey trade. Zibanejad has a full NMC so any talk about trading him is hopium. Ditto for Panarin, even though someone here seems convinced that Rangers rivals will help them with their problem.
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,051
1,838
The Twilight Zone
Kreider is one of two Rangers vets with limited trade protection that could realistically be traded. Salary is reasonable, good possibility for a hockey trade. Zibanejad has a full NMC so any talk about trading him is hopium. Ditto for Panarin, even though someone here seems convinced that Rangers rivals will help them with their problem.

Yeah, Rangers fans hoping to trade Zib for someone like Zegras are just dreaming. A rebuilding team is not going to want Zibanejad. He's only of use to a current playoff team, but most of those either don't have a good young piece to give, or lack the cap space to take him on.

Kreider OTOH could bring a nice return. I imagine he'd be in much demand amongst playoff teams. If I'm a contender, I'd much rather be paying him what he's getting, than what you'd likely get for that money on the open market, and the term is reasonable.

If these guys are on the block, then the goal is not to get better

I get the conundrum, it's not unlike what most teams face towards the end of their window ... when/how to start the reboot or rebuild. Gotta be careful not to end up on a slow slide into oblivion, and bottom out with a barren pipeline. So trading Kreider, while it probably ends any illusions of chasing the Cup now, could shorten their "downtime" in the long run and also help make the bottom not so deep. It's probably the right approach.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,855
13,877
Elmira NY
The Rangers need cap space, and have worse players that make more money that are harder to move. If the Rangers move Kreider it’s not going to be a “hockey trade” it’s going to be for some combination of picks/prospects/ELC.

Rangers are going to move better players on more tradable contracts than worse players on anchors

My guess is they'd want a younger roster player and a very good prospect/draft pick. That they'll be also looking to fill a hole right now in their lineup. I don't see them creating hole without filling a hole or at least not unless they have someone in Hartford they believe is ready for the NHL now. That could be Berard but Berard could also still be premature. Getting a young D who's made it or is on the cusp of making it seems like it would be a thing for them either way though.

On the question of cap space.....for this year unless they intend to bring in a name player for prospects they don't need cap space. That's not to say that they don't have contracts that are biting them in the ass and a huge Shesterkin deal staring them in the face. However just moving on from Trouba (going into his final year next year) and Lindgren and Smith (UFA's this summer) would be more than enough to pay for Igor. I don't see next year's cap as a particular problem either. They will have to pay Kakko and Miller as well but the cap is going to rise again too and the rumors are that it will rise significantly.
 

StewieP19

Registered User
Dec 13, 2022
380
163
After this season Colorado and Rangers got salary cap problem
Colorado Can't resigned Rantanen with more money than Mackinnon and don't forget they got Makar to resign in 2 years.
YOu can't win a Stanley cup with Mackinnon @ 12.6 Rantanen @ 14 and Makar @16
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,792
4,266
Da Big Apple
Yeah, Rangers fans hoping to trade Zib for someone like Zegras are just dreaming. A rebuilding team is not going to want Zibanejad. He's only of use to a current playoff team, but most of those either don't have a good young piece to give, or lack the cap space to take him on.

Kreider OTOH could bring a nice return. I imagine he'd be in much demand amongst playoff teams. If I'm a contender, I'd much rather be paying him what he's getting, than what you'd likely get for that money on the open market, and the term is reasonable.



I get the conundrum, it's not unlike what most teams face towards the end of their window ... when/how to start the reboot or rebuild. Gotta be careful not to end up on a slow slide into oblivion, and bottom out with a barren pipeline. So trading Kreider, while it probably ends any illusions of chasing the Cup now, could shorten their "downtime" in the long run and also help make the bottom not so deep. It's probably the right approach.
zib for zeg is unrealistic agreed
zib is a commodity w/cost, level of production/upside
as a commodity he may have value to lit. coupla teams
that needs to be explored

Kreider should not be moved absent crazy good offer
he is exceptional athlete, trains hard, likely at least 1-2 yrs after his current deal is done next yr, then maybe another yr or 2 as he faces 40 then

as long as he remains productive, and works w/us on discounted home team deal of around 5-ish

there is zero reason to trade

Rs should have listened to bern and extended their window by selling certain vets sooner
that said, once vets are rolled over we still have an open window and the faster we get youth replacement in, the faster it extends
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,051
1,838
The Twilight Zone
Kreider should not be moved absent crazy good offer

Thing is, I could actually see someone making a crazy good offer for him. Playoff teams have no problem spending that kind of money in the offseason on worse players in free agency, so he's a no brainer, and his term is manageable with no long term damage if it doesn't work out. If you're a team close to the Cup, that's the kind of guy who can put you over.

Rs should have listened to bern and extended their window by selling certain vets sooner

Well that's always the problem. It's not like there's a flashing warning light saying "window is now closed." Hard to convince yourself to take a step back for a year or two in order to extend a window for 3-5 years down the road.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bernmeister

BLNY

Registered User
Aug 3, 2004
7,257
5,750
Dartmouth, NS
Probably fair to consider him a contemporary Owen Nolan.

Kreider is 33. Nolan was traded to the Leafs at 31. The Sharks got a first round pick in the year of the trade (Mark Stuart), a former first in Brad Boyes, and Alyn McCauley (4th round pick that was an everyday player but struggling to establish himself.

Three assets - A-/b+ prospect, future first, and a roster player with upside seems about right. Maybe adjust for cap world and the age difference.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,792
4,266
Da Big Apple
Thing is, I could actually see someone making a crazy good offer for him. Playoff teams have no problem spending that kind of money in the offseason on worse players in free agency, so he's a no brainer, and his term is manageable with no long term damage if it doesn't work out. If you're a team close to the Cup, that's the kind of guy who can put you over.



Well that's always the problem. It's not like there's a flashing warning light saying "window is now closed." Hard to convince yourself to take a step back for a year or two in order to extend a window for 3-5 years down the road.
just to be clear, my track record indicates I make these calls in close to real time, not way after the fact
but that is me
others are not as much ahead of the curve, arguably
 

FiveTacos

Registered User
Oct 2, 2017
1,051
1,838
The Twilight Zone
just to be clear, my track record indicates I make these calls in close to real time, not way after the fact
but that is me
others are not as much ahead of the curve, arguably

That's great, but let's be realistic here, GMs are often subject to pressure to push forward, not take a step back even if the window is closing. They don't tend to make moves that give up on the Cup now but yield benefits 3+ years down the road, because there's a good chance they won't be the GM by then.

You as a fan ... it's a lot easier to make that call because, well, you ain't going anywhere, right?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad