Proposal: CHI-PHI
- Thread starter MicronMega
- Start date
SnS
Global Moderator
Philly wouldn’t do that for TK alone, let alone adding a first to it.
Empoleon8771
Registered User
You could take Philly adding #32 overall and I still think they'd say no to it.
Raddysh has zero value and Murphy likely doesn't have great value either. Him being retained down to 50% is probably the only thing giving him even some value with his performance in the past few years.
Raddysh has zero value and Murphy likely doesn't have great value either. Him being retained down to 50% is probably the only thing giving him even some value with his performance in the past few years.
He’s a UFA next year and I still kind of feel like this is the low end at the TDL.
ponder719
M-M-M-Matvei and the Jett
I know it flips the value the other way and Chicago would obviously reject it, but replacing #18 with #2 is closer than the deal in its current form.
Hockeypete49
How you like me now!
- Mar 22, 2009
- 6,985
- 501
Why does TK seem to have so little value? I'm not buying the "next contract" excuse. If a team is trading for him they are doing so with (1) the knowledge that his next contract will be significant and (2) they have the caps space to do so. It is not ike his next contract is going to be so much different than a gazillon other contracts today's GMs have given out.
Chicago doesn’t do this.
TK is 1 year from UFA.
The difference between 18 and 32 huge in this draft.
Murphy, a mid level 2nd pairing RHD at about 2 mill is a steal.
Raddysh has minimal value as a 4th/5th liner but Chicago has already overpaid.
TK is 1 year from UFA.
The difference between 18 and 32 huge in this draft.
Murphy, a mid level 2nd pairing RHD at about 2 mill is a steal.
Raddysh has minimal value as a 4th/5th liner but Chicago has already overpaid.
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
Why would Hawks add a 27 yr old winger who is a year away from FA and wants to be paid far more than he is worth?
Team that extends Konecny at longterm big $ will regret it
Deal does nothing for Hawks outside of downgrading draft pick
Team that extends Konecny at longterm big $ will regret it
Deal does nothing for Hawks outside of downgrading draft pick
Charlie Conway
Oxford Comma
- Nov 2, 2013
- 5,094
- 2,719
Looking at Philly's roster, they have a lot of players. I don't see how adding more to that would help them in any way.
They have 13 forwards, not including the rumored Michkov or RFA Brink. Plus, Lycksell could probably take on a top-9 role.
If I'm them, I want to move quantity for quality (or add a player to move up to swap picks with Ottawa, if that rumor is true).
They have 13 forwards, not including the rumored Michkov or RFA Brink. Plus, Lycksell could probably take on a top-9 role.
If I'm them, I want to move quantity for quality (or add a player to move up to swap picks with Ottawa, if that rumor is true).
10YearsAfter
Registered User
Raddysh absolutely stinks, Murphy is soft and overpaid. Briere would and should be insulted by this offer
I would say Murphy is a mid level 2nd pairing RHD. Played ok last year paired with an 18 year old rookie who plays no defense.
And Korchinski’s game suffered after Murphy was injured.
I’m not a huge Raddysh fan but scored 20 goals with regular middle 6 duty. Kills penalties. … best suited as a 4th liner but he’s an NHL level player.
Also the OP deal was Murphy @ 50%. He’s a mid level 2nd pair guy and would be a steal at 2.2m
10YearsAfter
Registered User
you'd be offering 2 players that have zero value to a rebuilding team. hence the offer is TK & 31 for 18. Bullocks
Blackhawkswincup
RIP Fugu
Hawks as rebuilding team have no need for 27 yr. old TK and his coming FA and demand for massive Longterm commitment
Also, LOL at anyone who buys the Flyers management/ownership selling a "Rebuild"
At end of day Hawks/Flyers are not good trade partners unless Flyers are looking to move down from #12 but given the plethora of picks Flyers are already blessed with this draft its unlikely they would have interest in moving down
Maybe Hawks could have interest in Farabee or Frost and could look to leverage Leafs 2025 1st as potential trade chip
I still don't understand why Torts has issues with Frost but its Torts
Djp
Registered User
On her PHL is overvaluing him.
Nobody us trading a 24 1st without knowing he can be signrd.
. A deal would be a rental which is a team that feel confident in making playoffs thus the pick is likely in mid 20s+ secondary prospect+ contract going back.
If Chicago felt they would be a playoff team next year given 18 is higher than what the pick could be next yr they would give up a lesser prospect
He screams buyer beware
Ad
Latest posts
-
Patrick Laine injured in pre-season game after knee on knee- Latest: Coaches Coroner
-
-
-
-
