BobbyJet
The accountability era?
So Hawks G depth in organization went from
Crawford
Darling
Raanta
Leighton
Carruth
Nilsson
Nalimov
To
Crawford
Darling
Leighton
Nalimov
Sad. Ain't it.
So Hawks G depth in organization went from
Crawford
Darling
Raanta
Leighton
Carruth
Nilsson
Nalimov
To
Crawford
Darling
Leighton
Nalimov
Took a stroll through the edmonton boards, and i'm kind of bummed they're feeling great about this trade, most of them glad we took Coughlin away.
Stan could trade away a prospect player for a jock strap, and he would get defended by some here.
Stan could trade away a prospect player for a jock strap, and he would get defended by some here.
Watch this be an intolerably bad trade to a few folks somehow, though.
The worst part of this off season is, the best thing he has done is trade SAAD, not moving sharp at the draft was a disaster and have no idea how he could not see that. Moving 2 NHL goalies for AHL player's makes no sense when you may have to move Crawford. Giving AA a 5 years 4.55 EXT without playing a game and never putting up 40 points in 5 years.
Please post link of the trade offers received for Sharp at the draft. Thanks
I think that sums it up IMO. Stan was getting nothing for Sharp or Bicks before and decided to pull back and hope for just a teensie bit more. If not, they both will be given away for cap savings. That would have been my original price for them.
I laugh at all the posts from Spring about how the Hawks were going to reload the draft picks given away when they started moving guys.
And he could trade a prospect for Sidney Crosby and some in here would moan. Two way street
Not true, people have turned into observers rather than thinkers. The same people that praise him for every move will praise him for keeping a player and make an argument for it bit 24 hours later if that player is traded will do a complete 180 and convince themselves that the opposite is true just because Stan did it, but let's say if I proposed that same exact trade an hour before it happens, I would be ridiculed to no end.
The Hawks just won the Stanley Cup. Who gives a **** about draft picks? Those moves were worth it.
Not true, people have turned into observers rather than thinkers. The same people that praise him for every move will praise him for keeping a player and make an argument for it bit 24 hours later if that player is traded will do a complete 180 and convince themselves that the opposite is true just because Stan did it, but let's say if I proposed that same exact trade an hour before it happens, I would be ridiculed to no end.
How about, when stuff happens, people have to find a way to accept it because WE can't change it.
So we have to look on the bright side.
It isn't that hard.
Nice so we lost 2 NHL goalies for absolutely nothing, and with the cap situation in the hell that it is in, Stan kills any possibility of trading Crawford incase it's really needed. Good job bud! You always know how to give yourself no options at all.
Trading Crawford was only ever a possibility in your own head.
I thought this was a board that we come here and discuss the moves and analyze if good or bad, rather than just sit Ina circle and say ok will accept that and keep a smile on, and if anyone in the circle dare say that is not a good move, they are labeled as negative and their comments are "cringe worthy" it's the same tactics used in day to day life and in politics when they wanna shut someone up because they are not going with the flow and being "politically correct"
Sad. Ain't it.
So sad bro. Having a two time Stanley Cup winning goalie, and arguable Conn Smythe winner. Then having your butt buddie as his backup. So sad.
Your biasness knows no bounds, and it's getting pathetic.