PlayMakers
Registered User
Will he succeed or fail as the #1c?
What do you project his point totals to be, and why?
What do you project his point totals to be, and why?
If the stat in another Bruins thread is true he has one 5\5 goal in the last 40+ games.I see a guy who’s still giving an effort. He made a diving poke check to get the puck out of the Dzone yesterday. I don’t see that kind of effort from the other vets.
He’s never been a guy who can carry a 2nd line. He can play there if he plays with talent. This year, with Marchand’s slow start, and no RW, he doesn’t have the talent to be an effective 2nd line or an effective checking line yet, he has to go out there every night and play against top lines.
It’s not true. He scored a 5on5 goal in April and March. And I think he scored 18 points after the All Star break.If the stat in another Bruins thread is true he has one 5\5 goal in the last 40+ games.
That's dreadful for a top 9 F your depending on. I noticed a decline in his play when he came back from last years All Star break and he ultimately stabilized his play but he looks worse this year. 50\50 chance this guy is regressing to a 30 point player.
I see a guy who’s still giving an effort. He made a diving poke check to get the puck out of the Dzone yesterday. I don’t see that kind of effort from the other vets.
He’s never been a guy who can carry a 2nd line. He can play there if he plays with talent. This year, with Marchand’s slow start, and no RW, he doesn’t have the talent to be an effective 2nd line or an effective checking line yet, he has to go out there every night and play against top lines.
ThisThey should flip Coyle and Lindholm. Coyle is noticeable in the offensive zone, shielding the puck, going to the net, trying to make plays.
Lindholm has been good to very good defensively but the offense just isn't there for him right now.
They should flip Coyle and Lindholm. Coyle is noticeable in the offensive zone, shielding the puck, going to the net, trying to make plays.
Lindholm has been good to very good defensively but the offense just isn't there for him right now.
So 8 mil later , it is now decided what you already had was better, so you could have taken that 8 mil and shored up other weaknesses, such as a 1st line wing and a second line wingThey should flip Coyle and Lindholm. Coyle is noticeable in the offensive zone, shielding the puck, going to the net, trying to make plays.
Lindholm has been good to very good defensively but the offense just isn't there for him right now.
I don't think there was a 1st line wing available for $8m, let alone both a 1st line wing and a 2nd line wing. Guentzel signed for $9m.So 8 mil later , it is now decided what you already had was better, so you could have taken that 8 mil and shored up other weaknesses, such as a 1st line wing and a second line wing
It takes two to get an assist.Coyle has one assist through 25 games.
H's not making plays at all.
But it's not like he's setting anyone up either. At even strength production he just passed Poitras and is still trailing Hampus Lindholm and Johnny Beecher.It takes two to get an assist.
He set up Frederic between the hash marks against MTL. He set up Marchand at the top of the crease against PIT. He made a spinning pass thru the crease to Frederic against the Islanders... I think he's making plays and playing well.But it's not like he's setting anyone up either. At even strength production he just passed Poitras and is still trailing Hampus Lindholm and Johnny Beecher.
800+ games into his career and his ceiling has always been a great 3rd line center. He hasn't been playing close to his best this year. Maybe when he gets his game back on track they can try to move him up, but for now he should focus on righting his own ship.
I should probably know this but I'm terrible at line combination memory - have we seen Pasta / Zacha / Lindholm together for any extended time? Pasta and Zacha have something, it just feels like Lindholm should fit in there with them. Or Pasta / Lindholm / Marchand? I'd hate to break up Pasta & Zacha though, Pasta brings out the best in Zacha and we're not deep enough to create another bottom 6 forward production-wise.
This looks like 'it' to me, too. I was thinking having Lindholm at the wing, I believe he's played there before. I was going to say he could take faceoffs too, but I looked up the stats and Zacha is actually higher at 54% vs 52.9, but Elias has taken like twice as many. I was just spit-balling though trying to get Pasta with Elias, I think they could really connect given the chance, but Zacha needs to be there just for the chemistry.I like Zacha a lot more as a center. Probably the best playmaking center on the team and is currently playing good two way hockey.
IMO the key add would be a top 6 LW'er to add to the Zacha line. Geekie seems to be playing better the last few games but I think that's a spot they can improve on and then they can put Geekie down the lineup ( or part of a trade for said lw'er )
Vatrano -- Zacha -- Pasta
Marchand -- Lindholm -- Braz
Frederic -- Coyle -- Kastelic
Kopeke -- Beecher -- Geekie
They started the season together and played about 8 games. It was not good.I should probably know this but I'm terrible at line combination memory - have we seen Pasta / Zacha / Lindholm together for any extended time? Pasta and Zacha have something, it just feels like Lindholm should fit in there with them. Or Pasta / Lindholm / Marchand? I'd hate to break up Pasta & Zacha though, Pasta brings out the best in Zacha and we're not deep enough to create another bottom 6 forward production-wise.
This is great, much appreciated!They started the season together and played about 8 games. It was not good.
Zacha-Lindholm-Pastrnak 41.3 xG%
Monty went to your second suggestion frequently late in games. It was better...
Marchand-Lindholm-Pastrnak 60.7%
The current version of the top line creates scoring chances better than any of the other options they've tried...
Geekie-Zacha-Pasta 64.3%
The current version of the second line...
Marchand-Lindholm-Brazeau 57.6%
And I'd like to know if this line's numbers are just a small sample size...
Marchand-Coyle-Brazeau 92.4%
Move Lindholm down and go withThey started the season together and played about 8 games. It was not good.
Zacha-Lindholm-Pastrnak 41.3 xG%
Monty went to your second suggestion frequently late in games. It was better...
Marchand-Lindholm-Pastrnak 60.7%
The current version of the top line creates scoring chances better than any of the other options they've tried...
Geekie-Zacha-Pasta 64.3%
The current version of the second line...
Marchand-Lindholm-Brazeau 57.6%
And I'd like to know if this line's numbers are just the small sample size...
Marchand-Coyle-Brazeau 92.4%
I'm not seeing the same set up game you are, I mean he's tied with Merkulov and Oesterle in assists. And he was their #2 center for the first 10-15 games.He set up Frederic between the hash marks against MTL. He set up Marchand at the top of the crease against PIT. He made a spinning pass thru the crease to Frederic against the Islanders... I think he's making plays and playing well.
He looks like a beerleager out there.Alright folks, what's the deal. He's stopped taking face-offs. He's behind the play and not producing. They need him (or any center) to step up drastically.
What do you think his problem is? Injured, age catching up, just a tough couple months?
Alright folks, what's the deal. He's stopped taking face-offs. He's behind the play and not producing. They need him (or any center) to step up drastically and they're still feeding him ice time.
What do you think his problem is? Injured, age catching up, just a tough couple months?