In the old format, lets take BVB and PSG as an example.
BVB was seeded in pot 2 and PSG in pot 1.
A difficult group would be something like (2023 group):
PSG
BVB
Italian team who finished 4th or something (lets say AC Milan)
Some stray from the top-4 leagues who got into the CL for the first time in years (lets say Newcastle)
Now, it's a difficult group, but the bottom line is you only have to beat the teams in your group on points to go through. You have a difficult draw, but all the teams in your group have the exact same fixtures. You will either go through - or not - based entirely on your merit.
What the current draw does is:
BVB - RM, Barca, Brugge, Celtic, Shakhar, Dinamo, Bologna, Sturm.
PSG - Bayern, City, Atleti, Arsenal, Salzburg, PSV, Girona, Stuttgart.
So one team has the most difficult draw in the league, and the other has one of the easiest.
But the point total is still what counts, regardless of who you play against.
It is NOT a competition in the same environment.
Why does it bother me, as a neutral, aside from a bloated number of games that a large majority of people don't watch or have no interest in?
Cause in the next round, the KO round, which is supposed to be more competitive, based PURELY on the fixture list, we'll have some very mid/shoddy teams in the there. Like my Dinamo Zagreb, who isn't only mid, but utterly wrecked by injuries - yet if they somehow beat Celtic, they're through.
Only to be massacred by a team like City in an utterly boring and lopsided tie.
In no world, not in any, way, shape or form, is Dinamo ZG better than PSG.
But they may end up ahead of them based purely on the fixtures.
Again, in my mind, any league competition is only fair if everyone plays everyone.
Anyway, not trying to chance anyone's mind, you trying to explain my POV,