CBJWerenski8
Rest in Peace Johnny
- Jun 13, 2009
- 43,628
- 26,655
Signing a guy early to an extension coming off of a major surgery/injury, who turns 31 before the contract kicks in, and who has played 51 career NHL games is a choice.
There’s always oneSigning a guy early to an extension coming off of a major surgery/injury, who turns 31 before the contract kicks in, and who has played 51 career NHL games is a choice.
And it's frequently the same one.There’s always one
justin danforth's aav: $1.1mSigning a guy early to an extension coming off of a major surgery/injury, who turns 31 before the contract kicks in, and who has played 51 career NHL games is a choice.
Are you paying his extension? It's a million dollars with a major cap increase all but guaranteed next season. There's literally 0 risk...Signing a guy early to an extension coming off of a major surgery/injury, who turns 31 before the contract kicks in, and who has played 51 career NHL games is a choice.
Are you paying his extension? It's a million dollars with a major cap increase all but guaranteed next season. There's literally 0 risk...
There’s always one
Who? If those players are good enough and Danforth is bad enough he spends a season in the AHL or gets claimed. I fail to see the problem...Less about the money and more about he and Olivier taking up roster spots next season when there are going to be better options, imo.
How dare we question the great and mighty Jarmo who has seen this team to the 23rd best points % in his deacade-long tenure, getting out of the first round once.
Less about the money and more about he and Olivier taking up roster spots next season when there are going to be better options, imo.
How dare we question the great and mighty Jarmo who has seen this team to the 23rd best points % in his deacade-long tenure, getting out of the first round once.
100%I'd take Danforth over literally any of the other utility guys we've got. Robinson, Foudy, Olivier, Bemstrom, even Kuraly.
But no debate about the jokeI am going back Danforth on whether this is a good deal or not
I suspect you may have lost track of who we're talking about. The only other 'utility guy' on the roster it would be even more absurd to complain about extending at all would be Texier. If he'd been given term, that might be cause for complaint, but this is a steal.Less about the money and more about he and Olivier taking up roster spots next season when there are going to be better options, imo.
I think Olivier not. Every team needs players like him. And if we had Oliviers, Gudbranson and Voronkov together, I don't think Wilson/Reaves etc would be interested in provoking/causing fights either.I'd take Danforth over literally any of the other utility guys we've got. Robinson, Foudy, Olivier, Bemstrom, even Kuraly. And this tells me so would the FO.
I don't trust Jarmo and JD anymore either, but I like this particular signing. You do still need fourth liners on good teams, which we will hopefully be next year.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm a big Olivier fan. Thirteenth forward who can cycle into the lineup to provide toughness? Absolutely. But I still take Danforth for the roster first, especially when Gudbranson is already there (and especially next season, Voronkov from game one).I think Olivier not. Every team needs players like him. And if we had Oliviers, Gudbranson and Voronkov together, I don't think Wilson/Reaves etc would be interested in provoking/causing fights either.
I'd take Danforth over literally any of the other utility guys we've got. Robinson, Foudy, Olivier, Bemstrom, even Kuraly. And this tells me so would the FO.