CBJ Board Summer '13 Prospect Rankings: #16

Samkow

Now do Classical Gas
Jul 4, 2002
16,354
488
Detroit
Results so Far
Rank | Player | Position #1 |Ryan Murray|D
#2 |Cam Atkinson|RW
#3 |Alexander Wennberg|C
#4 |Boone Jenner|C
#5 |Tim Erixon|D
#6 |Kerby Rychel|LW
#7 |Dalton Prout|D
#8 |Marko Dano|C
#9 |Oscar Dansk|G
#10 |Cody Goloubef|D
#11 |Anton Forsberg|G
#12 |Dillon Heatherington|D
#13 |David Savard|D
#14 |Oliver Bjorkstrand|RW
#15 |Mike Reilly|D

Simply vote for the prospect you think is the best prospect of the above and vote who you would like to see added to the next poll from the choices below. This poll will be open 24 hours.

This uses HF Criteria, hence why some players have spent time in the NHL.

Added: Nick Moutrey
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,695
26,735
No Curcuruto. That's not right, he should be in the top 20, maybe even top 15 after this year.

Went JAM. and if Viqsi does do adds add Curcuruto
 

stevo61

Registered User
Jul 5, 2011
11,802
13,351
Canada
Voted JAM. We have some intriguing prospects still left on the board which is really a good sign. A guy that noone ever talks about but i'm a pretty big fan of in Collins. A bottom 6 guy that has a lot of character in Sedlak. A speedster and offensive guy in Soberg. Curcuruto who has been pointed out. Guys that haven't quite played to what was hoped but still could have a future with Tynan and Weber. Could also make cases for Anderson and even Melart as we get to know more about him. No we don't really have any Elite prospects after Murray but we are deep with legitimate NHL prospects

Edit: Almost forgot Ouellette. Kinda fitting i suppose, pretty stiff competition at his position and he'll probably be the forgotten one
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
No more adds? Lame. So much for DSL's "honorable mentions". Poor JAM, 22 years old and already pigeon holed around here.
 

blahblah

Registered User
Nov 24, 2005
21,327
972
Wha? I could not care less about honorable mentions. I barely care about 15-20.

Didn't you say something about this a few polls ago? No I'm not going to bother looking, but someone said something about not stopping on the adds and something about "honorable mentions". I thought that was you, pretty sure it was a blue.

I didn't care about 1-5, never mind 15-20 and beyond, but if we're going to vote we might as well vote. I'm a bit of a completest.
 

GoJackets1

Someday.
Sponsor
Aug 21, 2008
7,092
3,829
Montana
Blah I think it was Viq who brought up honorable mentions.

I presume there will be quite a bit of shuffling around from this year to next, not counting next years picks.
 

major major

Registered User
Feb 18, 2013
14,598
1,669
I actually think this list is pretty damn good. As in 1) Good prospects, and 2) We're not morons for ranking them this way. It's not bad when you're biggest complaint is no Curcuruto.

We probably have, what, somewhere between the 6th to 15th best prospect pool in the league?
 

Nanabijou

Booooooooooone
Dec 22, 2009
2,993
659
Columbus, Ohio
Savard and Tynan? Higher? I for one am quite shocked at the very suggestion.

;)

I'm with you on Savard being higher. I think he'll bounce back this year.

I'll be honest and say I don't get your obsession with Tynan. I followed college hockey more closely this year than usual due to the lockout, and he was pretty invisible every time I watched Notre Dame play (only watched 4 full games, but still...).

If you are 5'8" and in your third year of college, you better be lighting the lamp if you hope to play beyond the following year. The fact that his production has dropped 2 years in a row suggests a trend rather than an off year. He's going to have to nail out of the park this year if he wants to get back on the radar.

Anyways, hope you're right. It would be nice to get something out of the Filatov fiasco.
 

Viqsi

"that chick from Ohio"
Oct 5, 2007
55,764
35,387
40N 83W (approx)
I'm with you on Savard being higher. I think he'll bounce back this year.

I'll be honest and say I don't get your obsession with Tynan. I followed college hockey more closely this year than usual due to the lockout, and he was pretty invisible every time I watched Notre Dame play (only watched 4 full games, but still...).

If you are 5'8" and in your third year of college, you better be lighting the lamp if you hope to play beyond the following year. The fact that his production has dropped 2 years in a row suggests a trend rather than an off year. He's going to have to nail out of the park this year if he wants to get back on the radar.

Anyways, hope you're right. It would be nice to get something out of the Filatov fiasco.
It may be just fortuitous sampling. Every time I've watched him he looks like he's psychic.

I am concerned about the apparent scoring trend, and if it continues he'll drop off my list with horrifying speed. But I'm not about to give up yet.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad