And my last contribution before I go back into my self-imposed exodus - this trade was done despite knowing what it would mean to the locker room. Perhaps this is a sign from ownership/management that not everything can be about positivity and brotherly love.
This was a result of their own creation, and the biggest component to the "overly-positivity" and brotherly love of the room, they extended him for more years. You may know the guy, he's the head coach. But sure, let's trade away the guy that actually changed his habits and put the work in to become a more professional. I'm sure that will send that sort of message.
Not commenting on Mitts (he was great), but he's very close to a lot of players who either didn't show up in shape or otherwise weren't ready to play in October, I think many of us would agree on that. What this says is we want you to be happy in Buffalo, but if you want to keep your band together you better produce results. I dont mind it.
Nothing about this screams as a results based, send a message, trade. If they were looking to send this sort of message, maybe trading away a guy that you raised the expectations on, with massive raises and long term commitments without a NTC attached, that has crapped the bed on their end of the deal so far.
Thing like this can lead to a lot of off-ice positive growth.
Or trading away the guy that was popular in the room that did everything you asked of him, that worked his tail off, to become the leading scorer of your team, could send a terrible message after watching management giving out large unearned contracts like candy to young players. It could send a poor message in the room, and create a rift between players and management, especially when you continue to not improve the quality of leadership for the organization.