Proposal: Carson Soucy to the Leafs for Muzzin +

I am Canadian

AM34|WN88|MM16
May 22, 2008
6,676
2,824
Toronto
What would be the ask for the Leafs to dump Muzzin on Seattle in return for Soucy? Soucy can play both sides if I recall correctly.

Muzzin signed through 2023-24 at 5.625 and Soucy signed through 2022-2023 at 2.75 [UFA in summer 2023]

Would open up additional cap for the Leafs and obviously would need a significant sweetener from the Leafs.

What would it take?
 

cwede

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 1, 2010
9,984
7,930
"..obviously would need a significant sweetener from the Leafs"

why? Muzzin a proven regular top 4 D, for a depth D, Soucy, whose never exceeded 62 GP in a season?

you can always hope a team might pay a premium for some Cap relief,
but it rarely plays out as the opportunistic fans hope ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: KaosKommando

jmelm

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
13,418
3,828
Toronto, Canada
Well a first round pick as the starting point, and then add a good prospect to that since the Leafs don't have a 2nd rounder in the next 2 years.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: kevrondl

jmelm

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
13,418
3,828
Toronto, Canada
@kevrondl

Your laugh suggests you don't know who Carson Soucy is or his value. SEA could have got a late 1st for him at the deadline if they were willing to trade him.

Toronto had to give up a 1st to get CAR to take Marleau for one season. Muzzin has 2 years left on his deal after this year and has signficant injury/durability concerns.

So add those 2 things up and what do you think, realistically, the Leafs would have to add for a Muzzin for Soucy trade?
 

I am Canadian

AM34|WN88|MM16
May 22, 2008
6,676
2,824
Toronto
"..obviously would need a significant sweetener from the Leafs"

why? Muzzin a proven regular top 4 D, for a depth D, Soucy, whose never exceeded 62 GP in a season?

you can always hope a team might pay a premium for some Cap relief,
but it rarely plays out as the opportunistic fans hope ...
Muzzin has major injury concerns and he hasn't been playing like a top 4 this season at all.
 

I am Canadian

AM34|WN88|MM16
May 22, 2008
6,676
2,824
Toronto
@kevrondl

Your laugh suggests you don't know who Carson Soucy is or his value. SEA could have got a late 1st for him at the deadline if they were willing to trade him.

Toronto had to give up a 1st to get CAR to take Marleau for one season. Muzzin has 2 years left on his deal after this year and has signficant injury/durability concerns.

So add those 2 things up and what do you think, realistically, the Leafs would have to add for a Muzzin for Soucy trade?

Do you have a source for that 1st round pick offer they received? Not really doubting as it seems pretty fair but would rather see the proof.
 

OG Eberle

Registered User
Aug 25, 2011
1,571
1,980
@kevrondl

Your laugh suggests you don't know who Carson Soucy is or his value. SEA could have got a late 1st for him at the deadline if they were willing to trade him.

Toronto had to give up a 1st to get CAR to take Marleau for one season. Muzzin has 2 years left on his deal after this year and has signficant injury/durability concerns.

So add those 2 things up and what do you think, realistically, the Leafs would have to add for a Muzzin for Soucy trade?

If you add up everything in your post there, it realistically says that you don't watch the Leafs, don't pay attention to Muzzin at all, and that you actually don't know his value.

He isn't some cap dump with no value on a boat anchor of a contract lol. And I know that as an Oilers fan.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,823
21,673
MN
This wouldn't be a bad move for Toronto if they could do it by sending a 2nd. Soucy isn't prime Muzzin, but Muzzin isn't prime Muzzin any more.
Only problem is that Soucy is only signed for one more year, so Dubas would just be kicking the can down the road a little ways.
Soucy is a good player.
 

jmelm

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
13,418
3,828
Toronto, Canada
If you add up everything in your post there, it realistically says that you don't watch the Leafs, don't pay attention to Muzzin at all, and that you actually don't know his value.

He isn't some cap dump with no value on a boat anchor of a contract lol. And I know that as an Oilers fan.

Well given that I live in TOR and have season tickets, I'm plenty familiar with Muzzin's game.

He's a fine player when healhty, but long term health and durability is a huge questionmark and he's signed for 2 more years.

SEA would only be interested in Muzzin if they were confident they could flip him to another team -- but good luck with that, even with retention, given his health concerns, the flat cap, and the fact he's signed beyond next season, which reduces his value in the cap world at his age.
 

jmelm

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
13,418
3,828
Toronto, Canada
This wouldn't be a bad move for Toronto if they could do it by sending a 2nd. Soucy isn't prime Muzzin, but Muzzin isn't prime Muzzin any more.
Only problem is that Soucy is only signed for one more year, so Dubas would just be kicking the can down the road a little ways.
Soucy is a good player.

Yes, but I think it goes without saying that the Leafs wouldn't do such a deal unless they were able to secure a contract extension with Soucy, and you could likely sign him to a long term deal that' about $1M -1.5M less per season than Muzzin, which is signficant cap savings for a team so tight against the cap.
 

Flukeshot

Briere Activate!
Sponsor
Feb 19, 2004
5,184
1,739
Brampton, Ont
I think Soucy makes a lot of sense for TOR but Muzzin doesn't need to go back the other way to Seattle.

I think Muzzin has some value so the Leafs would be better off making two separate trades. Trade Muzzin for something, no value added. Then trade for Soucy alone be it pick/prospects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jiggy35

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,823
21,673
MN
Yes, but I think it goes without saying that the Leafs wouldn't do such a deal unless they were able to secure a contract extension with Soucy, and you could likely sign him to a long term deal that' about $1M -1.5M less per season than Muzzin, which is signficant cap savings for a team so tight against the cap.
Yeah, he might sign a 5 x 4M contract. Hakstol not playing him in SEA had to have been a shocker, and will make him value the security. He is missed in MN.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmelm

jmelm

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 27, 2002
13,418
3,828
Toronto, Canada
Yeah, he might sign a 5 x 4M contract. Hakstol not playing him in SEA had to have been a shocker, and will make him value the security. He is missed in MN.

I think SEA’s plan is to keep him unless they get an offer they can’t refuse.

Francis chose to not deal him at the deadline when there was plenty of interest and said he wanted to keep him. I am not sure, however, that Hakstol is the coach beyond this season.
 

57special

Posting the right way since 2012.
Sep 5, 2012
49,823
21,673
MN
I think SEA’s plan is to keep him unless they get an offer they can’t refuse.

Francis chose to not deal him at the deadline when there was plenty of interest and said he wanted to keep him. I am not sure, however, that Hakstol is the coach beyond this season.
Hakstol has proven nothing as an NHL coach.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jmelm

MisterT

Registered User
Nov 29, 2006
1,466
1,346
Well given that I live in TOR and have season tickets, I'm plenty familiar with Muzzin's game.

He's a fine player when healhty, but long term health and durability is a huge questionmark and he's signed for 2 more years.

SEA would only be interested in Muzzin if they were confident they could flip him to another team -- but good luck with that, even with retention, given his health concerns, the flat cap, and the fact he's signed beyond next season, which reduces his value in the cap world at his age.
Well if you live in Toronto you should know that the Marleau dump that necessitated a 1st being sent to Carolina was so that the Leafs could keep space to fend off an offer sheet on Marner. Not the case here with Muzzin and if his injury concerns are to the point whereby his career is jeopardized, then he'll go to Robidas Island.

So if Seattle pegs Soucy's value as a late 1st, would Robertson work as he'll be unlikely to get a top 6 roll in Toronto.
 

LEAFANFORLIFE23

Registered User
Jun 17, 2010
47,390
16,030
@kevrondl

Your laugh suggests you don't know who Carson Soucy is or his value. SEA could have got a late 1st for him at the deadline if they were willing to trade him.

Toronto had to give up a 1st to get CAR to take Marleau for one season. Muzzin has 2 years left on his deal after this year and has signficant injury/durability concerns.

So add those 2 things up and what do you think, realistically, the Leafs would have to add for a Muzzin for Soucy trade?

Marleau and Muzzin are not even remotely the same situation for many reasons, not the least of which is Toronto has no core players that need new contracts, and no Jack Campbell is not a core player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevrondl and Pinto

Irie

Registered User
Nov 14, 2010
4,684
4,635
Pacific Northwest
Well if you live in Toronto you should know that the Marleau dump that necessitated a 1st being sent to Carolina was so that the Leafs could keep space to fend off an offer sheet on Marner. Not the case here with Muzzin and if his injury concerns are to the point whereby his career is jeopardized, then he'll go to Robidas Island.

So if Seattle pegs Soucy's value as a late 1st, would Robertson work as he'll be unlikely to get a top 6 roll in Toronto.
Robertson would definitely be of interest to Seattle.

Francis would like to resign Soucy, he's been a really solid, top 4 two-way defender for the Kraken, but if Soucy is not interested in being part of a franchise "build" and doesn't extend this offseason, I think Francis has to at least kick the tires on a deal like this.

As for the original deal, Muzzin is of no Interest to the Kraken.

There was almost no young talent available in the expansion draft, so Francis had to take aging middle tier vets. His goal now is to slowly flip them for picks and prospects to build a farm and a younger team.

Worst case scenario, the kraken keep Soucy for their top 4 this season and move him for a late first at the dealine.
 

kihei

McEnroe: The older I get, the better I used to be.
Jun 14, 2006
43,837
11,108
Toronto
Robertson would definitely be of interest to Seattle.

Francis would like to resign Soucy, he's been a really solid, top 4 two-way defender for the Kraken, but if Soucy is not interested in being part of a franchise "build" and doesn't extend this offseason, I think Francis has to at least kick the tires on a deal like this.

As for the original deal, Muzzin is of no Interest to the Kraken.

There was almost no young talent available in the expansion draft, so Francis had to take aging middle tier vets. His goal now is to slowly flip them for picks and prospects to build a farm and a younger team.

Worst case scenario, the kraken keep Soucy for their top 4 this season and move him for a late first at the dealine.
Agree with this post entirely. Hope we keep Soucy who has become more valuable as the season progressed. But if circumstances necessitate a move Robertson would.be an attractive addition as we have way too few young, skilled prospects.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad