He's not a game changer no, but he's good-ish 2nd/3rd line guy who can put up some points... when he gets going... He's super streaky.From a fancy stat standpoint it's most likely fine, but does he actually help teams win?
From a fancy stat standpoint it's most likely fine, but does he actually help teams win?
From a fancy stat standpoint it's most likely fine, but does he actually help teams win?
From the little I saw from him, he didn't seem too bad if he'd be your 3rd line C. He was good for 40-45 points in Columbus. I could have pictured the Sabres or Bruins going for him for some added depth at C, something they both could use.Thought he was decent in playoffs. Rags fans seem to disagree, but they also might actually like how Trouba plays hockey, so it’s hard to know what to think.
Yeh I only caught a couple of Rags games in detail, but thought he was fine and had his moments. And would be fine as a 3C option in this League.From the little I saw from him, he didn't seem too bad if he'd be your 3rd line C. He was good for 40-45 points in Columbus. I could have pictured the Sabres or Bruins going for him for some added depth at C, something they both could use.
He’s fine as cheap depth, but he doesn’t bring much to the table. He’s an NHL player, but doesn’t do anything particularly well. I was not a fan of his with NYR. Just a very blah player. It depends what you paid, and what your expecting…
For the Canes, it's likely scoring for the bottom-6, some PP minutes, and taking RH faceoffs. Basically the Stefan Noesen role except Roslovic can also take faceoffs.
He’s fine as cheap depth, but he doesn’t bring much to the table. He’s an NHL player, but doesn’t do anything particularly well. I was not a fan of his with NYR. Just a very blah player. It depends what you paid, and what your expecting…
In Columbus we thought Roslovic was one of our best PKers, and he was one of our best PP scorers from the bumper position. He was never particularly good at faceoffs, and tends to be too absent minded defensively to stick at center. But Rod will push him and maybe that will help. He was pushed last year to be more physical and he is strong enough to look good doing that, but he went back to playing soft after a little while.
Great speed and shot, incredibly streaky and frustrating how he manages to disappear for so long. His scoring numbers always end up okay, but that's twenty games of elite looking offense and 50+ of him doing nothing.
I didn’t want to sound like I’m kicking a guy who left, but I wouldn’t want him around as more than a 13th forward.I think Rangers never saw the best Roslovic - but having an impression of "blah" probably means you didn't see the worst of him either, now that guy could really make you pull your hair out Slightly encouraging for Canes, might mean he's capable of being consistently OK in a good team.
In Columbus, it felt like every season he was really bad for 20 games, being one of the worst underachievers, then when the season was starting to feel already lost he'd start to improve and at some point you'd realize his numbers have actually become quite good in the context of his team and usage. Then he'd go on a 10 game hot streak late in the year where he'd look like a star. That would get your hopes up, so that he could properly disappoint you next fall again.
Most CBJ fans seem to sort of like him, but I think you'd be hard pressed to find a single one that is missing his on-ice contributions.
Sounds like Friedman is telling Roslovic what to do