CapWages vs PuckPedia

[Favin]

Now that CapFriendly is no more, which site do you use for NHL contract information?

CapWages
PuckPedia

Click to read more...

 

[banks]

I'm fine with PuckPedia so far. It's user friendly enough. And you can list cap details alongside on-ice stats like points.

But I haven't used CapWages much. It does look like it has some cool features, like listing projections and comparables for UFAs,

 

[HockeyVirus]

Capwages >>>> except they are not really plugged in like the other sites so it takes longer to get accurate information.

 

[Randy Butternubs]

I like the CapWages layout better. But PuckPedia has the better armchair gm tool.

 

[FriendlyGhost92]

I prefer CapWages and I can't even remember why because it's been so long since I used PuckPedia. There's some tool they have that PP doesn't have, and I can't remember what it was.

Both pale in comparison to CapFriendly, though.

 

[Emerica]

I like capwages' layout as its basically a copy of capfriendly but it seems to take longer to be updated than puckpedia and puckpedia's GM tool is much better

 

[habamillions]

I like capwages its almost exactly like capfriendly

 

[puckpedia]

I'm a bit biased but PuckPedia is my go-to...


In all honesty, we've made a bunch of changes to our site over the last few months (including an improved homepage that we launched yesterday) and we hope people are liking it.

 

[Mrfenn92]

Like both

 

[FriendlyGhost92]

The thing I hate about both is neither tracks trades directly from a player's page.

You could do that with CapFriendly.

 

[PAZ]

Mainly utilize Capwages as the UI is a lot better, but I trust PuckPedia's data more.

As others have mentioned, neither are close to Capfriendly.

 

[puckpedia]

The thing I hate about both is neither tracks trades directly from a player's page.

You could do that with CapFriendly.

At the bottom of our player page is their transaction log where you can see trade history

 

[puckpedia]

The thing I hate about both is neither tracks trades directly from a player's page.

You could do that with CapFriendly.

Hey there, last night we added another section to the team page to show recent trades/signings/news. Moved it up a lot higher from where it was previously.

-Taylor

 

[Eternal Leaf]

Capwages is closest to CapFriendly.

So I enjoy using it more.

 

[Favin]

I'm a bit biased but PuckPedia is my go-to...


In all honesty, we've made a bunch of changes to our site over the last few months (including an improved homepage that we launched yesterday) and we hope people are liking it.

Oh, hey there. Thanks for jumping it. Will be interesting to see how these sites evolve. Great resources, especially this time of year. While we got you here.... love to see easy ways to find various things like list of players with deferred salary, list of players Aug 15th expiring rights, and a mock draft tool.

(and if Ted Leonsis calls, don't pick up)

 

[Three On Zero]

Puckpedia, didn’t even know the other one existed.

 

[ponder719]

I prefer CapWages to check contracts; I generally don't need the up to the minute numbers for what I'm looking at, and PuckPedia's layout isn't as useful (doesn't go as far out into the future, way too much white space, way too much stuff before you get to the actual contract amounts, having all the draft picks visible up front is better than having to hover over the numbers one at a time to see which actual pick or picks they have), but I still spend as much time trolling PuckGM to look at proposed trades as I do on CapWages anyway.

Also, PuckPedia provides the underlying data for Puckdoku, for which I am eternally grateful.

 

[Porter Stoutheart]

CapWages is a nicer layout/clone of CapFriendly. Except not sure they really stay on top of things or put as much work into things as PuckPedia? I'm glad we at least still have these. Neither one is even close to CapFriendly, alas. But I'll take the cloning effort of CapWages, incomplete as it is.

 

[puckpedia]

Oh, hey there. Thanks for jumping it. Will be interesting to see how these sites evolve. Great resources, especially this time of year. While we got you here.... love to see easy ways to find various things like list of players with deferred salary, list of players Aug 15th expiring rights, and a mock draft tool.

(and if Ted Leonsis calls, don't pick up)

Those are all great suggestions, thank you!

 

[weaponomega]

I find the layout and the UI in puckpedia very difficult to read. Its messy and cluttered. I like CapWages much better.

 

[Fantomas]

There are people who like PuckPedia?

Are you ok? Can I help you? Do you need medical assistance?

Hey there, last night we added another section to the team page to show recent trades/signings/news.

Have you considered redesigning your website so it doesn't look like someone vomited on a page?

 

[Golden_Jet]

There are people who like PuckPedia?

Are you ok? Can I help you? Do you need medical assistance?

Yep Puckpedia is the way to go,
I prefer the more accurate and up to date version of caps and contracts.

 

[Random schmoe]

The PuckPedia site layout takes some getting used to, there is a ton of information displayed on (for example) a team's main page. But I found once I got used to the layout, the better quality of data won out.

One comment I'll make for our distinguished guest in this thread - When comparing the two, and noting that many people prefer the CapWages layout, one observation is that PP does not make good use of the entire display. Enormous portions of the left and right are just blank. Whereas CW uses that space to help spread out the information, makes it a little easier (to me at least) to process it all.

But all in all, both sites try to provide a free resource to us fans, and for that I'm very grateful.