Proposal: Caps/Sharks

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

Dicdonya

Registered User
Jul 21, 2011
4,463
2,605
Prefer picks and for the Sharks to rebuild, but assuming we don’t do that I’d take this deal.

Hill/Samsonov gives us two youngish goalies that have the potential to find their game and be good. If not oh well, we get a better draft pick instead which would be useful for this team.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,339
3,389
Los Angeles
Prefer picks and for the Sharks to rebuild, but assuming we don’t do that I’d take this deal.

Hill/Samsonov gives us two youngish goalies that have the potential to find their game and be good. If not oh well, we get a better draft pick instead which would be useful for this team.
If you prefer picks, Samsonov + 3rd?
 

Misery74

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,461
2,403
Caps are not trading Samsonov for Reimer. This is just silly.

And if they did, San Jose would need to add.
 

Roshi

Registered User
Feb 7, 2013
2,063
2,063
Finland
Come on, you keep going at weird proposals. Right now ill rather play Vanecek over both, Sammy or Reimer. So why do this?

And Samsonov should still have more value than Reimer, so adding from our side just doesnt feel right. Personally I wouldnt do this 1 for 1.

No.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Misery74

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad