- Feb 18, 2018
- 4,979
- 7,090
Does he have MSL‘s tree trunk legs? Guessing no since he’s 35lbs lighter….I watched his AHL highlights. He's a very small player who needs open ice and time and space to be effective. When he has those things he can create plays or put up a nice shot.
But he has to get those things.
He's 25 now and has very little NHL experience. At his age Martin St Louis wasn't tearing up the league, either. It took a few more years for him to blossom into the great player he became...in his 30s.
MSL defied all the odds. It's not something you bet on.
Is it possible Phillips finds some way to play a 2-way game and find those passing and scoring opportunities without being thrown around or knocked off the puck? Anything is possible. But it's not something we or Carbery should be counting on just by throwing the guy out there more.
He should probably study before and after film of MSL from his 20s vs 30s.
careful, those are fighting words for a few posters!I am Phillips-ed out, I get that he is a shitty AHL plug already.
I feel like MSL had 20lbs on Phillips, easily. MSL was quite stout as I remember it. If he wants to get to that level he has to hit the gym and bulk up tbhI watched his AHL highlights. He's a very small player who needs open ice and time and space to be effective. When he has those things he can create plays or put up a nice shot.
But he has to get those things.
He's 25 now and has very little NHL experience. At his age Martin St Louis wasn't tearing up the league, either. It took a few more years for him to blossom into the great player he became...in his 30s.
MSL defied all the odds. It's not something you bet on.
Is it possible Phillips finds some way to play a 2-way game and find those passing and scoring opportunities without being thrown around or knocked off the puck? Anything is possible. But it's not something we or Carbery should be counting on just by throwing the guy out there more.
He should probably study before and after film of MSL from his 20s vs 30s.
This. Oshie will always be a Caps GOAT but let’s move on to players who can still move up and down the ice.Not just saying this because I think he’s washed but I was hoping that was it for Oshie. If there’s one player who should retire for health concerns it’s him. He’s had at least five documented concussions in the NHL by his own admission and I’m sure a few more that he picked along the way in college and before. His dad was diagnosed with a degenerative brain disease at age 47 and died at 56. Osh has a wife, four kids, and no worries about money for generations to come in his family. He will be 37 in two weeks. Just retire, dude.
I agree. Entirely separate from how it affects the Caps. Just on a human level, I'm concerned about his long term health. He's got nothing left to prove, and the rest of his life to enjoy.Not just saying this because I think he’s washed but I was hoping that was it for Oshie. If there’s one player who should retire for health concerns it’s him. He’s had at least five documented concussions in the NHL by his own admission and I’m sure a few more that he picked along the way in college and before. His dad was diagnosed with a degenerative brain disease at age 47 and died at 56. Osh has a wife, four kids, and no worries about money for generations to come in his family. He will be 37 in two weeks. Just retire, dude.
I actually agree on Oshie. To me it is different that Backstrom. I understand why Backy wanted to give it a go and come back from his injury. It didn’t work but i have no issue with his desire and attempt. Concussions are real, long term impact injuries. His style of play, when he is effective, is taking the body and banging. He doesn’t play a fluid, fast game. He plays a banging style which just continues to put him at risk.I agree. Entirely separate from how it affects the Caps. Just on a human level, I'm concerned about his long term health. He's got nothing left to prove, and the rest of his life to enjoy.
Sounds like exactly what I said about how his defense is coming through transition and not zone time, and that his zone starts are strongly skewed towards making sure he doesn't start in the defensive zone when possible because he gets erased from cycle play. Makes him difficult to find space for even when he provides value, which is what was said. Edit: for clarity, I was only looking at d-zone shifts to make this point about deployment being in line with Milano and Kuznetsov, the idea being that even with defense as his best asset he's not being used in defensive deployments for a reason.Phillips starts more of his shifts on the fly than anyone on the team, and gets very few offensive zone starts compared to anyone outside of the 4th line.
Oh no, quick, better find a new graph to post like it's the answer whenever someone talks about the previous graph... I'm talking about the chart from yesterday that started this, the one you guys were trying to make a big deal out of like it told the whole story? This one:What are you talking about?
Oshie needs to be done.Not just saying this because I think he’s washed but I was hoping that was it for Oshie. If there’s one player who should retire for health concerns it’s him. He’s had at least five documented concussions in the NHL by his own admission and I’m sure a few more that he picked along the way in college and before. His dad was diagnosed with a degenerative brain disease at age 47 and died at 56. Osh has a wife, four kids, and no worries about money for generations to come in his family. He will be 37 in two weeks. Just retire, dude.
twabby posted 2 charts that showed the whole team. I posted one chart comparing the two players that included the data from both charts. It's dishonest to accuse me of misrepresenting the data while you're the one cherry picking the data that was posted. It's kind of baffling that you would resort to this in order to score cheap points on some obscure internet argumentOh no, quick, better find a new graph to post like it's the answer whenever someone talks about the previous graph... I'm talking about the chart from yesterday that started this, the one you guys were trying to make a big deal out of like it told the whole story? This one:
View attachment 780377
where a lot of "eh" players seem to contribute about as much to GAR and most on this list manage to out perform him offensively by a lot. So we've got a guy deployed largely in transition who can't create offense being praised as the solution for a team that is defending fine but can't create offense... make it make sense?
How am I cherry picking a chart presented to me by reading the information presented and drawing a conclusion that you have not once bothered to explain your opposition to with actual words?twabby posted 2 charts that showed the whole team. I posted one chart comparing the two players that included the data from both charts. It's dishonest to accuse me of misrepresenting the data while you're the one cherry picking the data that was posted. It's kind of baffling that you would resort to this in order to score cheap points on some obscure internet argument
Emphasizing the chart that is more favorable to the argument you're trying to make while disregarding the one that shows it to be a laughably ridiculous argument is cherry picking.How am I cherry picking a chart I didn’t pick by reading the information presented to me and drawing a conclusion that you have not once bothered to explain your opposition to with actual words?
lol all I said is “by this chart Malenstyn is displaying roughly equal value” and you brought in a new one with different metrics instead of explaining anything. Even in the chart you posted, with Corsi in it even though I thought people were past that, they STILL show that Phillips doesn’t produce shooting volume (read: offense) on the ice.Emphasizing the chart that is more favorable to the argument you're trying to make while disregarding the one that shows it to be a laughably ridiculous argument is cherry picking.
I'm ignoring the fact that you also misrepresented the chart that you did use.
The chart that you were referring to showed Phillips displaying more value than Malenstyn. That's why he was further up on the chart, right? It's showing better offensive results and much better defensive results.lol all I said is “by this chart Malenstyn is displaying equal value” and you brought in a new one with different metrics instead of explaining anything. Even in the chart you posted, with Corsi in it even though I thought people were past that, they STILL show that Phillips doesn’t produce shooting volume (read: offense) on the ice.
Elaborate on one, any of these things with some actual insight instead of just saying “nope, you did it wrong” and this will be a real conversation.
I don’t even care about his on ice performance. If he was pacing for 30+ goals I’d be saying the same thing. I lost my grandmother to Alzheimer’s and it’s a brutal disease. Had a friend who was a competitive triathlete who keeled over and died at 46 of a heart attack while on a bike ride and his dad died of a heart attack at age 47. Oshie has it in his family and there’s a history of early onset brain damage given how young his father was. He’s 10 years away from how old his dad was when he was diagnosed. It doesn’t matter how good of an athlete you are, you’re not beating your genetic makeup. Science always wins.This. Oshie will always be a Caps GOAT but let’s move on to players who can still move up and down the ice.
I'm glad lapi's going down. That kid needs more ice time he gets up here. He's looked pretty good when given a chance, but he'll develop more in hershey.Lapi down. What a shame. He has been amazing. Hopefully he is back up soon.
I don’t need fancy stats to show me otherwise that Phillips is nothing more than a 13th/extra and out-of-place fourth liner at best.
Carbs made some interesting comments in his post practice presser today. He was talking about analytics (which i love because no other coaches do it). But he remarked that it’s hard to look at analytics for 4th line because they don’t really represent the good work they do. Part of this is taking a large amount of defensive zone faceoffs and also playing against top lines.
His point (I think) which i agree with is analytics are important but they must be paired with the eye test and situational impact.
so your chart was just GAR and not different measurements?The chart that you were referring to showed Phillips displaying more value than Malenstyn. That's why he was further up on the chart, right? It's showing better offensive results and much better defensive results.
The chart you want to disregard shows the same thing, only much more dramatically. It's obvious why you chose the one you did.
The chart I posted didn't have "different metrics". It showed the exact same metrics from both charts, though yes it did also show corsi (you got me!). If you don't know what you're looking at, you can just say so.
Fair. But my point remains. Analytics are valuable. Interesting way to see some trends. But they must be paired with the eye test.Situational impact and deployments are accounted for in GAR. For instance Dowd, NAK, and Malenstyn have ~38% xGF which is among the worst numbers in the NHL (all in the bottom 5% in the league).
However GAR rates them much more highly (all above the 30th percentile) precisely because it weighs the context in which these on-ice numbers were accumulated. Zone starts, QoC, QoT, score and game-state, etc. are all taken into account.