Niskanen makes almost 6m per. Not feasible.
I wonder about Gallant coaching a team with veterans and expectations. His squads in Florida and Vegas were overachievers with kids and cast-offs.
As long as whatever notion we replace it with accounts for everyone thinking their roster was hopelessly bad after the expansion draft, sure.Can we put to bed the notion that VGK was solely "kids and cast-offs?" Existing teams were limited far more than in prior expansion drafts as to whom they could protect. Not to completely discount the work necessary to make the right selections and then get them to gel as a unit, but they weren't the 74/75 Caps.
That was habit based on the way people think of expansion teams. It was not based on the facts of the VGK roster. They had high-end talent, including a multiple Cup-winning tender. That team was better than any previous expansion roster by a country mile.As long as whatever notion we replace it with accounts for everyone thinking their roster was hopelessly bad after the expansion draft, sure.
Can we put to bed the notion that VGK was solely "kids and cast-offs?" Existing teams were limited far more than in prior expansion drafts as to whom they could protect. Not to completely discount the work necessary to make the right selections and then get them to gel as a unit, but they weren't the 74/75 Caps.
Can we put to bed the notion that VGK was solely "kids and cast-offs?" Existing teams were limited far more than in prior expansion drafts as to whom they could protect. Not to completely discount the work necessary to make the right selections and then get them to gel as a unit, but they weren't the 74/75 Caps.
Watch when Seattle stumbles out of the gate. Vegas did great.
People are retroactively acting like the expansion draft rules are ridiculously in favour of the expansion teams. Every fan and analyst thought Vegas would suck.
so you’re predicting what? Seattle will be back to the traditional expansion doormat level?
Their current top 2 scorers, 2 of their top 3 centers, and Vezina finalist goalie weren’t on the team then and they’ve lost no one of consequence, it was a mediocre rosterVegas got gifted a roster of 30 top 6 players let’s not pretend that coaching them was some great feet
Their current top 2 scorers, 2 of their top 3 centers, and Vezina finalist goalie weren’t on the team then and they’ve lost no one of consequence, it was a mediocre roster
Watch when Seattle stumbles out of the gate. Vegas did great.
People are retroactively acting like the expansion draft rules are ridiculously in favour of the expansion teams. Every fan and analyst thought Vegas would suck.
I’d assume Kuznetsov is untouchable but I just thought I’d chime in and check since I don’t know how high the Caps are on McMichael and Backstrom just signed a big extension. Lmk thanks
It wasn’t Tatar or Reaves, William Karlson’s 23% shooting percentage played a big part in wins; Caps lose to lesser rosters in the playoffs all the time.It was a mediocre roster in September 2017. It was a Stanley Cup roster in June 2018.
Something changed.... what was it?
nobody is retro actively saying anything. People were blown away with the expansion rules and the roster they would get before that draft. No expansion team ever got a haul like that. Did they overachieve? Yes. Did people think they would go to the SCF? No. Was it a good coaching job to get those guys playing together? Yes. But don’t act like it was a normal first year roster, because that it wasn’t. We lost our best D prospect who would have probably been in the middle pair in 2018. He wasn’t a cast off, we didn’t want to lose him. They started with a top end starting goaltender because Pitt couldn’t keep the two they had. That was a mid tier playoff roster from day one.
Pittsburgh is self-destructing.
I would do the opposite: trade Vrana for a mid-range first (assuming Dawson Mercer or Amirov are available), and use FA to fill Vrana's spot with a playoff-ready vet.