- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,669
- 4,569
Canucks offer:
2024 1st
Lekkerimaki
Brzustewicz
Podkolzin
Kuzmenko
Do the Sabres say yes or no
2024 1st
Lekkerimaki
Brzustewicz
Podkolzin
Kuzmenko
Do the Sabres say yes or no
Proposal: Canucks overpaying for Tuch (Sabres)
- Thread starter BOBBY9
- Start date
Szechwan
Registered User
- Sep 13, 2006
- 5,672
- 7,589
You forgot to add Willander
krutovsdonut
eeyore
- Sep 25, 2016
- 16,872
- 11,263
How about no? You crazy Dutch bastard.
Way overpay but Sabres don’t need that trade / where are all those FWD going to play? They already have too many
- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,669
- 4,569
Put him on the wing w EP40.
Players with his size and style are difficult to find and he's a type of player we sorely need.
Got to over pay sometimes
Wrong club to target. Buffalo should be the team looking to convert prospect depth into a good player with term, not the other way around.
There's overpayment and there's this...
Skiiiiiiinerrr
Just more of me to love, honey
DingDongCharlie
Registered User
- Sep 12, 2010
- 11,343
- 10,263
Buffalo wouldn’t trade him.
The OP offer is terrible for Vancouver too. Just lock this up now
The OP offer is terrible for Vancouver too. Just lock this up now
JetsFan815
Registered User
- Jan 16, 2012
- 19,303
- 27,496
The Sabres say no. I doubt there is any patience in that fanbase or ownership for trading established NHL top line talent for futures.
Sabres don’t need more futures. But besides that point, that package is WAY too much for Tuch.
That’s crazy
That’s crazy
- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,669
- 4,569
Lets break it down:
2024 1st - Canucks CANNOT develop anybody who isnt a top 10 pick 75% of the time
Lekk - Small and weak.
Podz - Ceiling is a bottom 6 player
Bru - Some potential but also some holes
Kuz - Has value but out coach hates him
Last edited by a moderator:
That remains to be seen. Entirely new mgmt team and coaching staff.
- Feb 10, 2019
- 1,669
- 4,569
Snippit
Registered User
- Dec 5, 2012
- 16,568
- 10,046
Vancouver over pays in value but Buffalo also has no interest in this deal. We have tons of forward prospects that we need to be converting into established talent, not the other way around.
- Sep 27, 2017
- 5,612
- 3,462
This is one of those situations where asking the player isn't asking for his value on ice so to speak because there are intangible values etc to each team. It's like asking about marchand, tom wilson, crouse etc.
Sure all should in a vaccum have a price tag but they dont atm.
Sure all should in a vaccum have a price tag but they dont atm.
OP posted this in the Canucks forum, and literally no one replied.
I'm sorry to any other fanbase that read this, we could have stopped him but apparently didn't feel like it.
I'm sorry to any other fanbase that read this, we could have stopped him but apparently didn't feel like it.
- Oct 9, 2012
- 27,349
- 36,947
Vancouver laughs and says no, this isn’t Benning running the show anymore
Zman5778
Moderator
And you think the pu pu platter of IN YOUR WORDS highly flawed forward prospects gets you a top line wing.....from a team that is literally overflowing in forward prospects?
Hard hard pass from the Sabres.
Fatass
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 25,011
- 20,454
Actus
Of course Allvin never makes such an offer. His club doesn’t need Tuch or to tamper with their core dynamics like the Sabres need to.
Imho the Sabres would 100% pounce on this deal. Then they would use those elite prospects and the first to trade for players to make their current club better. It would be an excellent way for the Sabres to make a much needed change to their core, which is obviously off.
Of course Allvin never makes such an offer. His club doesn’t need Tuch or to tamper with their core dynamics like the Sabres need to.
Users who are viewing this thread
Latest posts
-
-
-
Dhaliwal- Kevin Bieksa has rejected multiple offers this off-season to become an Assistant Head Coach (11 Viewers)- Latest: Honour Over Glory
-
-