Will be fascinating if they revisit this around the draft.
Will be fascinating if they revisit this around the draft.
Thanks for transcribing. Zucker as the hold up makes no sense given he is a pending UFA.
Will be fascinating if they revisit this around the draft.
From the rumours of them trying to find a third team, the Canucks probably wanted to deal away those first round picks immediately for a young centre. The fact that it didn't happen means they were probably sniffing around playoff teams who would understandably want to retain their depth.
I think it was probably a complicated deal from the Canucks end. Pittsburgh gives up two 1sts and a cap dump. Canucks try and flip that cap dump for an asset. Also try and trade at least one of those draft picks in a Kirby Dach-like deal. Problem is those deals happen at the draft and not the deadline.
The Penguins had room for Miller for this year and didn't need to dump cap as they went and got Granlund. Something doesn't really add up here with the information we've been presented.
My guess would be the cap dump would have been someone with a contract beyond this season. Petry or Carter if they were willing to waive their NMC and the Canucks would move them to a preferred destination. Would explain why moving either player was more complicated than usual.
Yeah, Petry was my guess at the time as he was rumoured to be available. I have no reason to doubt Seravalli though in regards to Zucker but there just has to be more there.
Well he doesn't mention Zucker. That came from a tweet summarizing it but, as far as I can tell, Seravalli never made a Zucker to the Canucks connection.
I saw that above, but I do think I heard him say Zucker when they played a clip of him on H&B this morning.
It has to be that, because otherwise not taking on Zucker as the dealbreaker is extremely odd.That would make sense. If I can make some time tomorrow, I'll see if I can find the quote.
It could just come down to Zucker having an NTC and was only willing to waive it to the Canucks if they moved him on to a different team. All seems strange, though.
Will be fascinating if they revisit this around the draft.
That would make sense. If I can make some time tomorrow, I'll see if I can find the quote.
It could just come down to Zucker having an NTC and was only willing to waive it to the Canucks if they moved him on to a different team. All seems strange, though.
A proactive management team that has an actual plan would’ve sold high on Miller at the draft when picks are at their lowest value and traded those picks at the draft when they’re at their highest value. Now at the draft Vancouver could be competing with other teams that are also looking to shed their higher cost players.I think it was probably a complicated deal from the Canucks end. Pittsburgh gives up two 1sts and a cap dump. Canucks try and flip that cap dump for an asset. Also try and trade at least one of those draft picks in a Kirby Dach-like deal. Problem is those deals happen at the draft and not the deadline.
From the rumours of them trying to find a third team, the Canucks probably wanted to deal away those first round picks immediately for a young centre. The fact that it didn't happen means they were probably sniffing around playoff teams who would understandably want to retain their depth.
wasn't there speculation that the nhl effectively snuffed out the trade when they put out the memo that they were gonna be closely examinng trades involving LTIR players
A proactive management team that has an actual plan would’ve sold high on Miller at the draft when picks are at their lowest value and traded those picks at the draft when they’re at their highest value. Now at the draft Vancouver could be competing with other teams that are also looking to shed their higher cost players.
One big plus for any potential Miller trade this offseason is that the free agent market is straight trash so any teams wanting to make a splash may be looking hard at acquiring a player like Miller.