- Dec 6, 2011
- 12,871
- 41,759
Doesn't look particularly good. But cheap to acquire and easy to expose after qualifying from the looks of it.
I assume this means we're not qualifying Ned and this is our way of exposing a goalie? Or we're about to get Ned signed and using our protection slot on him?
Gotcha, all these rules make my head spin a bit. Though I don't know why you wouldn't just qualify Helvig, he's at least a capable goalie, this Wells dude sucked even in the ECHLI don't think this is about Ned, because if we qualify him we will protect him, and if we don't he doesn't qualify for the exposed goalie.
I think this means we won't qualify Helvig, and need another eligible goalie to expose.
Gotcha, all these rules make my head spin a bit. Though I don't know why you wouldn't just qualify Helvig, he's at least a capable goalie, this Wells dude sucked even in the ECHL
So I assume then Wells isn't arbitration eligible? That would make more sense then. Does the QO affect the ability to give a two-way contract? I'd hate to "accidentally" waste a roster spot on this guy, but if he's making AHL salary and stuffed in the minors, it's a "who cares"...if he's even making $500k that seems like a waste. Though I guess it's better than stupid arbitration going "Yea Helvig gets $1M" for some asinine reason.Helvig goes to arbitration when we try to pay him league minimum, and Dundon clearly has a bone to pick with arbitration this offseason.
Given Helvig has a 0% chance to make any impact on the roster whatsoever, I think Dundon not wanting to pay more than league minimum for a back-up AHL goalie/ECHL starter is reasonable.
We may just qualify the guy, offer him a 1-year league minimum deal, and if he balks we say "thanks for being our expansion draft guy" and part ways.
So I assume then Wells isn't arbitration eligible? That would make more sense then. Does the QO affect the ability to give a two-way contract? I'd hate to "accidentally" waste a roster spot on this guy, but if he's making AHL salary and stuffed in the minors, it's a "who cares"...if he's even making $500k that seems like a waste. Though I guess it's better than stupid arbitration going "Yea Helvig gets $1M" for some asinine reason.
So I assume then Wells isn't arbitration eligible? That would make more sense then. Does the QO affect the ability to give a two-way contract? I'd hate to "accidentally" waste a roster spot on this guy, but if he's making AHL salary and stuffed in the minors, it's a "who cares"...if he's even making $500k that seems like a waste. Though I guess it's better than stupid arbitration going "Yea Helvig gets $1M" for some asinine reason.
Shallow wells?
About sums up what I think of the new guy
About sums up what I think of the new guy
We're exposing him so we can save ourselves...So we got him just so that we can expose ourselves
A fellowship of wells. A.... Wellowship, if you mayIs that a council of Wells?
We're exposing him so we can save ourselves...
Yep, exactly thisI don't think this is about Ned, because if we qualify him we will protect him, and if we don't he doesn't qualify for the exposed goalie.
I think this means we won't qualify Helvig, and need another eligible goalie to expose.
A fellowship of wells. A.... Wellowship, if you may