Not what I said, no.
Clearly, you're unaware or just plain ignorant of the underlying issues surrounding the person in question and the noise of MTL's possible reluctance to take him? That's OK, tons of threads and posts around and articles that can enlighten you on the situation, go read up!
Obviously, there is no issue if they suck it up and take him at 5. Sounds like we would be pretty happy majority wise too.
But IF he happens to be there at 5, and you don't take him, AND Bedard, Fantilli, Smith and Carlsson just went 1 2 3 and 4, our options at 5 now dip into a lower tier.
Well golly gee,
It sure sounds like being in the 1, 2 , 3 and wow look at that even the 4th spot are ALL better spots than the #5 spot. Where the REAL biggest decision must be made.
Do you at least understand any of that? A little bit?
Again, Obviously, we can just TAKE Michkov, and everything would be fine, for the most part.
It's not that we're dying for someone else to take Michkov as if whoever falls to us will be the better player, the feeling is it would be "nice" if someone kind of "helped us" not get to this super difficult decision that will emerge at the draft ON the spot if it goes down the way most of us think it will.
Is what I saying.