Why does he still have a job?
Well, a year ago his team tops in their division. But the instant gratification crowd seems to have forgot that.
And I don't know, a year ago the playoff bound (and 5th over all) Vegas Knights didn't exist, the #2 ranked team in the league missed the playoffs. New Jersey had the #1 pick in the draft in the summer, but jumped to 15th over all this year.
So maybe he still has a job because adults don't panic and make decisions based on emotion and ignorance. My opinion though, he found a sucker to take a pylon with a $9mil a year deal and a NTC about to kick in off their hands, and got a far superior player, teammate and person in return
Bergevin got bent over in the PK trade. Nashville didn’t miss a beat after they traded their leader and captain for Subban.
They made it to the finals with PK as their best d-man
something Weber will never do.
He probably will never make it out the second round while PK has done that 3 times already lol, terrible trade for Montreal.
as a habs fan, I'd like to think this is true. it's not.The NHL would fold if the habs left.
What does speaking french have to do with having a job?speaks french
He's still GM because he has four years left on his contract.
ok, I will bite and let you go on your Fire Sweeney rant but how can you include the GM of the Bruins who has a great deal of young talent both in the NHL and AHL? Please don't say Barzal, that has been beaten to death and many GM's including Sweeney missed that one. Clearly you don't like him but putting him in the same category as Milbury and Bargainbin is a bit much in my opinion...He is going to beat Mike Milbury and Don Sweeney in the category of awful moves by a former mediocre defenseman.
The trade of Sergachev to me is less about how good Mikhail can be but more about how disappointingWell pointless to discuss the Subban trade, it was political and not a hockey trade and it will just crap up this discussion.
Sergachev for Drouin, jury's still out but the idea was to add some offensive talent. We'll see how good Sergachev ends up being (as well as Drouin...) but the Habs still have young D talent that has had a chance to get NHL play this year and looks promising (Mete, Juulsen, Reilly) so it's still an area of some prospect depth.
Drafting has been OK the past 3-4 years but these guys are still prospects. There's 7 guys now from Montreal's 2013-2016 drafts who have played NHL games with the club this year. No one has emerged with all-star potential which would be pretty helpful but a lot of teams could use a young all-star player surprise from a late 1st or 2nd round pick. Every team needs to do well in the draft to prosper, Habs have a lot of picks this year and need to find talent but in the short term Bergevin can't really be judged on this draft because we won't know for 3-4 years how the 2018 draft is panning out, at which point he'd be gone anyway if the team is just treading water in the NHL basement.
What you're saying makes sense. Bergevin per se did okay moves up until trading Subban.You never know either, maybe if he'd had a decent 1C to start his tenure it would be different?
I think the guy was doing well up until this past off season where he made panic moves that I don't think the organization truly thought through.
Trading Subban instead of firing the mediocre coach wasn't the worst decision in the world if the team is going to be greater than any star. But he fired the coach anyway...
Trading away Sergachev for Drouin in a vacuum was not a terrible move. What was bad was dealing him in the Habs case, having no 1C...
Radulov 2 summers ago was a great move in a vacuum. But all it did was give a shot of adrenaline to a team for a season and they were back to where they were without him right after.
Bergevin or not the Habs need to commit to retooling and nailing each and every first rounder next couple years.
What you're saying makes sense. Bergevin per se did okay moves up until trading Subban.
On a side note, things that I never understood were:
- Never letting Galchenyuk play center for a full season. He always produced. We can debate all we want about his lack of defensive talent, but he should have been playing center from the moment he was drafted.
- Not adapting the team to the new age... Subban is / was the type of player this team needed to change its image. I'm sorry, but the Canadiens will never be as glorious as they were in the past. The serious, almighty air the team had back then was backed up with what they brought... Acting the same way nowadays when the team is mediocre at best makes no sense. Subban was laid back, always happy, always playing hard. That's what the team and fans need... a refreshing type of player. Win or lose, everyone is satisfied with what he brought.
- The drafting... always drafting gritty players when there were some more obvious picks at the time. I'm sure we all had at least 1 player that we would have rathered have drafted at the draft because we believed he'd play in the NHL. In my case, it was the Connor crisp pick instead of Pavel Buchnevich. Extreme luck on my part? Sure, but the reason why Crisp was drafted was because of his character and grit. It's terrible.