- Feb 9, 2013
- 1,163
- 926
Apparently GMs were warned that next seasons schedule is going to be rough with the Olympics and possibly all star event being involved
To prevent injury and keep the players fresh why can’t active rosters be changed from 23 to 27 active players?
Adding 1 additional goalie, 1 defenseman and 2 forwards that don’t have to pass through waivers just makes a lot of sense.
Please tell me why this isn’t a good idea. I’m open to feedback
I just Think of the players that play through injuries when they wouldn’t have to with a bigger roster. In addition to quality of play should be better with more fresh players.
What benefit to the teams and fans is there when you lose a defence man and have to play with 5 players for half a game? You open your players up to more injury and fatigue often having to play the next night in a back to back.
To prevent injury and keep the players fresh why can’t active rosters be changed from 23 to 27 active players?
Adding 1 additional goalie, 1 defenseman and 2 forwards that don’t have to pass through waivers just makes a lot of sense.
Please tell me why this isn’t a good idea. I’m open to feedback
I just Think of the players that play through injuries when they wouldn’t have to with a bigger roster. In addition to quality of play should be better with more fresh players.
What benefit to the teams and fans is there when you lose a defence man and have to play with 5 players for half a game? You open your players up to more injury and fatigue often having to play the next night in a back to back.
Last edited: