C Shane Wright (2022, 4th, SEA) Part 4

Ace

Registered User
Oct 29, 2015
24,962
31,424
If theyre afraid he’s not mentally tough enough to remain engaged in a junior league he didn’t dominate as expected last year…I don’t even know what to tell them.

this isn't the way.

if questions about his engagement and effort dropping him to 4 didn’t humble him enough to recognize the problem I don’t think scratching him over and over or playing him 6 minutes is going to do it either.

what will do it is throwing him back and telling him there’s a reason we don’t play you and there’s a reason you watched three other players get their names called. Now go work on fixing that reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Evgeny Oliker

Marc the Habs Fan

Moderator
Nov 30, 2002
99,936
11,744
Longueuil
With every scratch, my theory that they are spacing out his games so he does not exceed 9 games played before Team Canada WJC Camp in early December is gaining steam. 5 more weeks of this.

The other thing is Kingston is 6-3-1. If they get Wright back now, they probably win at a higher clip and keep him. The more the Kraken wait, it becomes likely the Fronts probably don't maintain that type of pace and will have to entertain trading his rights before the trade deadline and Wright can join a high end contender like the 67's, Petes, Spitfires, etc appear to be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ottsabrefan

Garbageyuk

Registered User
Dec 19, 2016
6,577
6,418
With every scratch, my theory that they are spacing out his games so he does not exceed 9 games played before Team Canada WJC Camp in early December is gaining steam. 5 more weeks of this.

The other thing is Kingston is 6-3-1. If they get Wright back now, they probably win at a higher clip and keep him. The more the Kraken wait, it becomes likely the Fronts probably don't maintain that type of pace and will have to entertain trading his rights before the trade deadline and Wright can join a high end contender like the 67's, Petes, Spitfires, etc appear to be.
This, or they are just idiots. Which is more likely?
 

TheNumber4

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
44,435
55,385
Tin foil hat things, but Francis looked reluctant making this pick. Like he didn’t believe in Shane but since he dropped he reluctantly had to take him.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Smirnov2Chistov

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,995
So sending him back to the jrs to do WHAT exctly? None of us have no idea how to run a team or to actually develop players.. How will playing against teens for hte sake of playing against teens just for ice team get him any closer. Its not going to make him any more better next season cause he stil going to have the same adjusting period to NHLers. He is not going to get that adjustment by playing in the jrs for the next 2 year (yes two years cause he won't be any better than he is now to get regular top 9 mins next seaon) since he can't play in the AHL until age 20.

Tin foil hat things, but Francis looked reluctant making this pick. Like he didn’t believe in Shane but since he dropped he reluctantly had to take him.

Oh good god that is the lames take what so ever. Seattle was suprised he fell to them nothing more. There is no reluctantly...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Xirik

PeteWorrell

[...]
Aug 31, 2006
5,079
2,214
So sending him back to the jrs to do WHAT exctly? None of us have no idea how to run a team or to actually develop players.. How will playing against teens for hte sake of playing against teens just for ice team get him any closer. Its not going to make him any more better next season cause he stil going to have the same adjusting period to NHLers. He is not going to get that adjustment by playing in the jrs for the next 2 year (yes two years cause he won't be any better than he is now to get regular top 9 mins next seaon) since he can't play in the AHL until age 20.



Oh good god that is the lames take what so ever. Seattle was suprised he fell to them nothing more. There is no reluctantly...
Considering that he has never dominated like he should at the junior level; i would say he still has plenty to learn there.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,995
Considering that he has never dominated like he should at the junior level; i would say he still has plenty to learn there.

Dominating against teens does exactly what against NHLers... Look at Laf for the NYRs all he did in the quebec jr major league is dominate against teens and what exactly did that bring him as a NHL player against NHLers absolutely nothing. Laf struggled his rookie year in the NHL. Laf still wouldn't gained nothing by playing a 4th year in the jrs majors only to dominated against teens again.

That's the problem people are over selling the jr majors when it comes to developing players. It varies player to play what more jr majors can provide to a young player thats been drafted or signed as a undrafted player.


Can we stop over selling the jr majors the Jrs majors are not meant to be a development league for players that are stuck in the middle between jrs majors and the NHL and that is by design of the CHL organization.

The developmet wright actually needs which he can't get in the OHL is being delayed 2 years cause he's CHL and he lost a season of playing cause of the virus mess. He can't be in the AHL which would actually provide the development he needs until age 20 2 years later. Only option the team has is to get that development is in the NHL and there lies the problem.
 
Last edited:

PeteWorrell

[...]
Aug 31, 2006
5,079
2,214
Dominating against teens does exactly what against NHLers...
It helps him gain confidence and continue to perfect his craft like many great players have done before getting to the NHL. Wright lost an entire year of development thanks to the pandemic so he only has played two years instead of three. He would not be not going there as an overeager after having decimated the OHL but as just following the standard of playing three years at the junior level.
 

Fainting Couch

Registered User
Jun 21, 2019
985
1,537
Tin foil hat things, but Francis looked reluctant making this pick. Like he didn’t believe in Shane but since he dropped he reluctantly had to take him.

The only reason they took him at 4 was because they didn't think he would fall that far so didn't spend much time looking into him. Had they done their due diligence on him they would have not touched him.
 

VoidCreature

Before you see the light, you must die.
Mar 6, 2015
6,932
4,309
New Jersey
The only reason they took him at 4 was because they didn't think he would fall that far so didn't spend much time looking into him. Had they done their due diligence on him they would have not touched him.

Kind of like Fillip Zadina when he fell to Detroit. Could be.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,995
Here's the issue has it has nothing to do with wright. It has to do with how the team views the 4c role. Right now the average 4c role ices time at least i have seen so far is 6 1/2to 7 1/2 mins regadless if its geekie or wright.
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,995
The only reason they took him at 4 was because they didn't think he would fall that far so didn't spend much time looking into him. Had they done their due diligence on him they would have not touched him.

That is outright a bunch of bull and you know it. Stop with the stupid excuses. Most teams probably had wright has top player on their board but the also knew that he more likely was at the time before Montreal made their pick was already going to be taken. Only team that didn't not have wright on their big board that we know off was devils cause they didn't need another Center. Arizona also had the same assumption that Montreal was going to take write and decided to remain with their pick of Cooley instead of changing it just cause wright was available.

This has NOTHING against wright but how the the league views the the player ranking in the top 10 between each other and guess what there was no big huge gap between those 10 players. 1OA could been just about anyone of those top 10 rank of 2022 draft prospect.

It is impossible to really know why a player drops when its so darn close between players talent wise. If wright had the talent level let say Mcdavid or Matthews and there was a huge talent gab between 1OA and 2-10OA for example and Wright still dropped anyways, teams would exactly know why he dropped and would made adjustments or even made a trade up to get him.
 

ItWasJustified

Registered User
Jan 1, 2015
4,688
5,913
That's the problem people are over selling the jr majors when it comes to developing players. It varies player to play what more jr majors can provide to a young player thats been drafted or signed as a undrafted player.
What he needs to develop properly is playing hockey. Being on the ice for 6 minutes is not development.
Wright might be the best off going to Europe, not that it's going to happen.
Are players with CHL contracts even available to go to loan to Europe?
 

gstommylee

Registered User
Jan 31, 2012
14,799
2,995
Wright dropped to Seattle and Seattle took him and not anyone else cause he was hgiher on their big board even possible been their top pick on their big board. We would had taken Nemec if wright was taken by Montreal in that cause devils would had taken Slaf. Arizona would still taken Cooley.

If again Seattle had 1OA 2OA or 3OA and wright would still been available, we would still had taken wright cause getting long term franchise Centers are very very difficult to get. If it came between us taking Slaf, wright, cooley or nemec if all 4 was available at Seattle pick, We still would had take Wright cause thats how the team is building the roster and that is through the middle and is far better to have Wright and put him as 2c than taking Cooley and playing him as top line wing cause we already had someone that talented or better as our 1C and that is beniers.
 

bmore236

Registered User
Mar 3, 2004
66
48
The only reason they took him at 4 was because they didn't think he would fall that far so didn't spend much time looking into him. Had they done their due diligence on him they would have not touched him.
I wouldn’t agree with that since the assistant coach for the Kraken, Paul McFarland was the head coach and GM for Kingston. If anyone would know him it would be him. If Seattle has a belief that they need to make the playoffs, because Vegas went to the Finals, well then Hakstol is coaching for his job.
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,276
6,119
Even if the CHL team approved a loan to europe no way he goes near the KHL.
My point is that the KHL would probably not insist on CHL loan formalities... For the same reason going to the KHL right now is not a prime destination for anyone.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad